Between running multiple marathons, earning my running coach certification, and testing running shoes professionally for a decade, I鈥檝e cultivated a reputation as a Runner with a capital R. And, as a proper-noun Runner, I find myself having a similar conversation over and over again.

Friend: 鈥淚 think I want to try to get into running鈥攚hat kind of shoes should I get?鈥�  
Me: 鈥淲ell, it depends鈥︹�� (Goes into highly specific questions and recommendations, hemming and hawing over heel-toe drop and overpronation while my friend鈥檚 eyes slowly glaze over.)

The irritating truth is that there鈥檚 no shoe that鈥檚 absolutely perfect for every single runner. We all have different anatomy and different gaits, and the concrete surfaces I run on in Chicago are vastly different from the comparatively low-impact trails of Colorado. All of these factors (and more) will ultimately impact what running shoe is best for you.

While I鈥檝e been training for the Berlin Marathon this fall, however, I鈥檝e come as close as I鈥檝e ever come to discovering the Holy Grail of running shoes. The is a running shoe that works for most people, on most runs, most of the time, and one that I鈥檝e personally used for over a dozen runs in my ten-week training cycle.

The post I Just Ran My Sixth Marathon, and This Shoe Has Become My Go-to for Any Kind of Run appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

Picking the best road running shoe isn鈥檛 as simple as it used to be. As shoe technology has advanced, so have the options. With lighter, bouncier midsoles, comfort-focused uppers, bold new geometries, and embedded plates that boost efficiency and stability, there鈥檚 now a shoe for every type of run, making it harder than ever to know which one is right for you.

To help you choose the right running shoe for you, we continually test every new release with a diverse team of more than 20 runners, spanning a wide range of abilities and experience levels. Whether you鈥檙e a beginner learning to love running or a veteran chasing a new marathon PR, our road running shoe guide is here to help you find the perfect fit.

Updated October 2025: We鈥檝e selected new models in eight out of 16 categories and updated prices and availability for all the best road running shoes in the guide.

The post The Best Road Running Shoes for Training and Racing (Fall 2025) appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

The running world鈥檚 brief, passionate affair with the minimalist movement may have burnt out more than a decade ago, but minimalist running shoes are alive and well鈥攁nd experts agree there are good reasons you should own a pair.

At a Glance

• Why Wear Minimalist Shoes?
• What Is a Minimalist Shoe?
• Maximizing Your Minimalist Experience
• Meet Our Lead Tester

Minimalist shoe reviews, sorted from thinnest sole to thickest:

• Vivobarefoot Primus Lite Knit ($175)
• Merrell Vapor Glove 6 and Glove 6 BOA ($100-120)
• Vivobarefoot Primus Trail III All Weather FG ($175)
• Vibram Five Fingers V-Run ($160)
• Xero Shoes HFS II ($120)
• Merrell Trail Glove 7 ($120)
• Topo ST-5 ($120)
• Xero Shoes Scrambler Low EV ($150)
• Altra Superior 7 ($120)
• Altra Escalante 4 ($130)

Why Wear Minimalist Running Shoes?

Many sports med professionals continue to tout the benefits of minimalist footwear today, long after the fad faded. 鈥淓ven in a world dominated by maximalist footwear, I often recommend minimalist shoes鈥攅specially for casual wear, walking, and as part of a running shoe rotation,鈥� says sports podiatrist Rob Conenello. Conenello points out how the shoes encourage foot muscle engagement and better proprioception鈥攖he foot鈥檚 ability to sense and interact with the ground鈥攁nd, he says, 鈥淎 stronger foot leads to a more efficient and injury-resistant athlete.鈥�

Fellow sports podiatrist Paul Langer agrees, 鈥淭he health benefits are supported by more and more every year. I recommend minimalist shoes for almost all my patients because they have potential benefits that include improving foot strength and mobility, decreasing the risk of falling, and reducing foot pain.鈥�

Jay Dicharry, physical therapist and biomechanics researcher, says every runner should have a minimalist model as . 鈥淧utting less between you and the ground means the shoe鈥檚 cushion and geometry can鈥檛 do the work for you,鈥� Dicharry explains. 鈥淪pending time walking, and yes, some running, in minimal shoes will load your foot and lower leg a lot more. This increased load cues your body to build stronger bones, muscles, tendons, and durability in your feet. And a direct connection between your feet and the ground does wonders for your nervous system, your sense of stability, and can help filter out some imbalances in your stride.鈥�

What Is a Minimalist Running Shoe?

If you鈥檙e ready to follow this advice, you first need to know what makes a shoe minimalist. Minimalist running shoes are born from the assumption that the best, most natural running is done barefoot. Your feet should be free to be feet: complex constructions of arches, cables, and levers that react and adapt instantly to cushion, stabilize and propel. Given that most people today didn鈥檛 grow up going bare in all conditions, and thus didn鈥檛 develop the calloused soles necessary to tread safely and comfortably on all but the softest terrains, most minimalists concede that some sort of shoes are a necessary evil. But, to maintain natural proprioception and muscle activation, and encourage efficient posture and gait patterns, they believe shoes should stay as close to bare as possible.

What makes a shoe minimalist is a matter of debate, but in 2015, agreed on a formal definition: 鈥淔ootwear providing minimal interference with the natural movement of the foot due to its high flexibility, low heel to toe drop, weight and stack height, and the absence of motion control and stability devices.鈥� That definition provided parameters to determine how minimal any particular pair is, but left open to interpretation the exact line where a shoe becomes too high, too stiff, or too controlling to be considered minimalist. If you choose to go more minimal, it is up to you to decide which characteristics are most important and how low you want to go.

Maximizing Your Minimalist Experience

Put on a pair of minimalist shoes and you instantly feel light, nimble, and alive. Head out the door and you dance along, feeling a new, intimate, interactive connection with the earth beneath your feet鈥攗ntil you tire and start clomping along with no cushioning underfoot and return home to find your calves and achilles screaming. Most runners need to transition to minimal footwear very gradually, building up miles in them as slowly as they first added running miles when a beginner, or using them only occasionally as training devices.

鈥淏y removing the artificial cushioning and support, the feet are forced to do more work,鈥� Langer explains. 鈥淭his increased workload, if done gradually, will increase the foot鈥檚 capacity to support the body by strengthening muscles and ligaments and other connective tissue and allowing the joints to move in a broader range of motion. If not done gradually, people often get injured with metatarsal stress fractures, plantar fasciitis calf strains or Achilles tendinitis.鈥�

Whether or not you adopt minimal footwear all the time, using them sparingly is worthwhile to improve your posture and stride, as well as foot strength鈥攑articularly if combined with exercises to . And nearly everybody can use minimal shoes for walking and daily wear, which experts agree can be as valuable for improving your biomechanics as running in them.

Meet Our Lead Tester

Jonathan Beverly, Senior Running Editor, Gear

I fell in love with running my freshman year in high school in 1977, and quickly became fascinated with finding the perfect pair of running shoes. That quest got a boost when I became editor of Running Times in 2000 and started receiving every new model as they were released. I embraced the minimalist movement in the early 2010鈥檚, running thousands of miles鈥攊ncluding road and trail races鈥攊n barely-there shoes which reconnected me with my body and the earth, rejuvenating my running. But after suffering a metatarsal stress fracture and seeing others get injured in minimalist footwear, I dug into the contradictory studies on shoes and running form and talked to dozens of experts鈥攆rom scientists to medical professionals to coaches鈥攖rying to determine common ground. That research turned into a book, , which explores how to counteract the forces of a modern sedentary lifestyle and restore natural posture and movement so you can run more effectively (in any footwear).

Today, I wear every type of running shoe as a tester, but retain a preference for more minimal models, which I wear exclusively when not running. During this testing, however, I found that my adaptation to running in ultra-thin shoes had waned and my experience in them seemed typical for runners who have some experience with light, low models but are mostly accustomed to today鈥檚 high, soft shoes.

For this review, I ran in each model several times over three months, on different terrains and at a variety of paces, from jogs to sprint intervals. I also rotated them as my exclusive walking and casual shoes throughout the test period, including hikes up to 10 miles. Here are my picks for the best minimalist shoes for running today, ranging from nearly-bare to lightly-cushioned models.

Vivobarefoot Primus Lite Knit

Weight: 8.7 oz (men’s)/ 6.5 oz (women’s)
Sole Thickness: 6 mm (includes removable 2 mm insole)

From the first step in the Vivobarefoot Primus Lite Knit I felt a sense of freedom and connection, like being barefoot but with a tough, protective skin removing fear of sharp things underfoot. The sole is the thinnest of the shoes I tested if you remove the insole (tied with the Merrell Vapor Glove 6 with the insole), and flexes without resistance in all directions. The thin, knit upper, made with recycled plastics, is equally flexible, and, although the shoe鈥檚 width is voluminous, holds the rearfoot securely thanks to a stretchy, booty-like upper with overlay straps hugging the instep, plus a softly molded heel cup that snugs with light padding.

I wore these mostly casually, the ground feel always surprising me for the first few steps and quickly cueing my feet to engage and posture to straighten up. Runs in them were short, quick bursts, relishing the feeling of power transferring through my feet but being careful not to tire and start clunking. After, my feet always felt like I had done a “foot day” strength workout, that pleasant soreness that says they are alive.

One note: the size was so big the fabric bunched up between the eyelets. While I didn鈥檛 slide around in the shoe, a half size smaller than my usual running shoe would have fit better without interfering with toe space.

Merrell Vapor Glove 6 and Glove 6 BOA

Weight: 5.6 oz (men’s) / 4.6 oz (women’s) 鈥� BOA 6.7 oz (men’s) / 5.5 oz (women’s)
Sole Thickness: 6 mm

As the lightest, airiest, and tied-for-thinnest-soled shoe in the test, I could almost forget I had the Merrell Vapor Glove 6 on, except when I didn鈥檛 have to tread gingerly over iffy surfaces and gripped the trail better than when barefoot. I loved the breathable, slipper-like upper that has surprisingly plush padding in the ankle collar and the gusseted tongue, and the thin Vibram outsole, with 2.5-millimeter-deep, squiggly-line lugs. And I loved how the two worked together to move invisibly with my foot while providing robust protection, without trying to control or dulling my proprioception.

The Vapor Glove 6 is too minimal for me to do much running in these days (except for short hill sprints during walks), but when I wore them casually I could feel my feet activating and strengthening, and my balance improving. The laced version was stylish enough to wear extensively at work and around town, and I reached often for the BOA version鈥攚hich makes cinching and adjusting tension as easy as turning a dial鈥攚hile gardening and on long, dirt-road walks with my dogs.

Vivobarefoot Primus Trail III All Weather FG

Weight: 11.1 oz (men’s) / 7.8 oz (women’s)
Sole Thickness: 7.5 mm (includes removable 2 mm insole)

Every time I pulled on these all-weather, trail-ready Vivobarefoots and snugged the fit with the simple and effective pull-cord lace, my feet felt alive and ready to dance. The 7.5-millimeter-thick sole鈥攊ncluding 2.5鈥搈illimeter-deep, 鈥渇irm-ground鈥� lugs鈥攁dded just enough underfoot to make me feel confident running in them鈥攂ut in a specific, limited context. Having noted that my cadence has been slowing while wearing cushioned shoes, I decided these shoes, with barefoot-like ground feel but solid underfoot protection and grip, were the perfect tool in which to restore my springs. My weekly routine has become this: I sprint up a dirt road with quick, powerful strides, until I start to tire and my turn-over slows, then I鈥檒l walk until I鈥檓 ready to do another high-cadence 200 to 300 meters, repeating until I鈥檝e gone 1.5 to 2 miles. My foot and lower leg muscles are inevitably sore the next day, but I can already feel a renewed quickness and bounciness to my stride.

The firm sole, which wraps up around the edges in wavy sidewalls, flexes with ease, enabling full range of motion and terrain-adaptable landings and push-offs. Up top, the rugged, water-resistant fabric (95% RPET, 5% Spandex) flexes in the right places and secures the midfoot with a sturdy TPU saddle overlay, while the wide forefoot doesn鈥檛 interfere with splay, even wearing . The weight of the sole and protective upper make this shoe as or more suitable for hiking as for running鈥擨 comfortably did several 1鈥�2 hour hikes in them and they felt durable enough to hold up to whatever terrain I took them on.

Note: the fit runs large, I had to get a pair a half size smaller than my usual running shoe size.

Vibram Five Fingers V-Run

Weight: 4.8 oz (men’s) / 3.9 oz (women’s)
Sole Thickness: 8.5 mm (includes non-removable insole)

Running in Five Fingers is a familiar sensation for those who lived through and embraced the minimalist movement: a feeling of running barefoot as a child, free, alive and in touch with the earth. The design delivers unsurpassed toe splay, enforced by the separate toe pockets, and a close-to-the-ground, near-barefoot ride. I put in many miles in Five Fingers in the early 2010s on terrain ranging from asphalt streets to gravel backroads to jungle mud, and always felt like my body was waking up and paying attention. I also got injured going too long, too hard, too soon. This time I used them for shorter runs a couple of times per week, and loved the reconnection with the earth, always ending up doing some fast, nimble pickups or hill sprints.

The V Run is lighter than the original, while more supportive. The weight reduction comes mostly from the thin, perforated upper, that is more breathable but less soft than the original knit, and the removal of much of the outsole rubber. The pads that remain are attached to a four-millimeter-thick sculpted EVA midsole that adds some support as well as padding. I found the V-Run felt protective and fast, stiffening my foot lever a bit, but it also felt slightly more removed from the ground, somewhat stiffer, and less comfortable than the original.

Xero Shoes HFS II

Weight: 8.3 oz (men’s), 6.7 oz (women’s)
Sole Thickness: 12.5 mm (includes removable 3.5 mm insole)

The Xero HFS II鈥檚 sole is thin, unscultped (no hint of arch support), zero-drop, and entirely flexible, but has just enough underfoot padding (12.5 millimeters between foot and ground) to make it far more accessible to the majority of runners than a non-cushioned barefoot shoe. The first time I took them out I intended to mix walking with short run bursts, but found myself padding comfortably along and ended up running continuously for three miles on sidewalks, with a couple of grassy hill sprints thrown in. The next day I could feel the foot and calf muscles that got extra work, but they weren鈥檛 sore enough to warrant scaling down my planned run. I wore the HFS II as my only casual shoe for a week, which included walking two miles on city streets daily, and felt more comfortable and energetic than when wearing highly cushioned shoes.

Credit the thin layer of firmly responsive EVA for easing the transition. It contours and protects the bony protrusions underfoot but doesn鈥檛 sink and dull my proprioception of the ground, cueing my muscles to react and engage and my stride to get lighter and more balanced. For those wanting more underfoot feel, the 3.5 millimeter insole can be removed, leaving a smoothly finished interior with just fabric covering the midsole. The shape is wide and roomy from heel to toe, but holds the rear- and mid-foot securely with a well-padded collar and strategic straps that loop into the laces and wrap the instep. The chevron outsole lugs are flat-topped and thickly spaced enough to roll smoothly over roads but deep enough to grip on dirt: I ended up running mostly on gravel, which the shoe felt best suited for. My only beef was that the barrel laces felt clumsy when tightening the shoe and came untied easily.

Merrell Trail Glove 7

Weight: 8.5 oz (men’s) / 6.0 oz (women’s)
Thickness: 14 mm (includes non-removable insole)

The Trail Glove 7 crosses over the line from what I would consider barefoot shoes to minimalist running shoes. While still zero-drop, flexible, and not overly cushioned (11.5 millimeters of Merrell鈥檚 proprietary, firm-and-responsive FloatPro foam), they didn鈥檛 make my feet work as much as more minimal models, making it easy to put in more trail miles in them right off the bat鈥攂ut producing less of a training effect. I appreciated the grip from the 2.5-millimeter-deep, 30-percent recycled, Vibram-rubber lugs, and the support where the outsole wraps up in high sidewalls on both sides of the arch and over the heel and toe. The fit lives up to its glove-like name with a flexible mesh upper that wraps securely over the gusseted tongue, and a slightly narrower shape than other minimalist models.

Although agile on the run, I didn鈥檛 run in these very often after an initial week of testing over a variety of distances and paces, given that they offer neither the strong foot-strengthening stimulus of barefoot models nor the underfoot cushion of slightly thicker shoes. Their easy-going comfort, however, made them a frequent choice for casual wear and long walks that bordered on hikes, where their middle-of-the-road cushioning and solid stability proved just right.

Topo ST-5

Weight: 6.6 oz (men’s) / 5.3 oz (women’s)
Sole Thickness: 14 mm (includes removable insole)

The Topo ST-5 is the shoe I take on a trip to wear all day, every day, and know I will be comfortable and light-footed whether I鈥檓 walking for miles on concrete sidewalks, standing for hours at an expo, doing strength and plyometric work, or running short distances. The soft, flexible upper hugs my foot from heel to ball like a second skin, while the toe box is roomy and airy, with plenty of space for splay, even wearing . Underfoot, 14 millimeters (two millimeters less than the ST-4) of firmly bouncy Zipfoam allows me to feel and interact with the ground without getting bruised by it, and flexes easily in all directions, letting my arch and toes move freely.

Clean styling and subdued colors (I have both a black and a grey pair) let me wear the ST-5 anywhere from a run to a restaurant without feeling out of place. I reached for this shoe more often than any other shoe in the test because it disappears (from sight and feel) and lets me move nimbly and naturally without thinking about my feet or ending the day beat up.

Xero Shoes Scrambler Low EV

Weight: 9.2 oz (men’s) / 7.4 oz (women’s)
Sole Thickness: 15 mm (includes removable 3.5 mm insole)

The first thing that stands out about the Scrambler Low EV is how rugged it is: from the full-coverage, wide-lugged, Michelin tire rubber sole to the robust, abrasion resistant upper, this shoe it is built to last鈥擷ero is so confident it guarantees the sole for 5,000 miles. Fifteen millimeters of rubber and responsive foam lie between foot and ground, offering ample protection for your foot during those miles. Compared to other Xeros, the Scrambler Low EV sacrifices some softness and flexibility for that protection and durability. It maintains Xero鈥檚 effective midfoot straps that loop into the laces and snug the instep, but in terms of fit and flexibility, it feels more like a light hiking shoe than a speedy trail slipper (like the still-available Mesa Trail II that I love for its soft, foot-wrapping fit).

Given its ruggedness, hiking is where I ended up appreciating the Scrambler most, where it gave me confidence that it could stand up to whatever I stepped on or brushed against, and allowed stable and secure footplants on any terrain. For running, I found it felt more agile with the 3.5 millimeter insole removed, which improved the flexibility and ground proprioception while maintaining the shoe鈥檚 protection and sure-footed grip.

Altra Superior 7

Weight: 9.3 oz (men’s) / 7.7 oz (women’s)
Sole Thickness: 21 mm (includes removable insole)

Full disclosure, I鈥檝e been an unapologetic fan-boy of the Superior since it came out鈥攖he flexible, balanced ride makes me feel like a wild animal gliding over the earth, and the thin sole provides enough padding that I can run in them daily as long as I stay tall and land lightly. I took the Superior 7 out in western Nebraska鈥檚 sandhills and Utah鈥檚 rocky Wasatch Mountains, and found it as nimble as ever, equally capable on both terrains.

Underfoot, the 21 millimeter sole without a rock plate softens landings but still lets me feel the ground enough to dance agilely over uneven and unpredictable terrain, adapting to each varied footplant. It doesn鈥檛, however, morph and swallow rocks like a thicker shoe, thus requires foot and ankle strength to adapt and support on rough trails鈥擨 could feel the strain after longer outings, and noted my strength and reactive skills improving over time. On softer terrain, the low, widely spaced lugs dig in and grip but don鈥檛 get bogged down.

The redesigned upper is easy to cinch down for a secure fit, while, as expected from Altra, allowing plenty of room for splay. The mesh forefoot is flexible and breathable, while TPU overlays around the toe and saddle enhanced the durability and hold, although seeming a bit plasticky (until dirt build-up took the shine off).

Altra Escalante 4

Weight: 9.5 oz (men’s)/ 7.5 oz (women’s)
Sole Thickness: 24 mm (includes removable insole)

The Escalante is foot-shaped and zero-drop, but doesn鈥檛 count as a true minimalist running shoe to purists as it has 24 millimeters of cushy, bouncy foam reducing the flexibility, ground feel, and foot activation and strengthening. Compared to most of today鈥檚 shoes, however, I found the thin sole provided plenty of proprioception, enhanced by Altra鈥檚 proprietary AltraEGO foam that firms up quickly on compression with a lively bounce-back. The lightly structured, engineered knit upper coddled my feet without cramping them or controlling their movement.

I found myself running tall and striding quickly in these, and was able to go as long as I wanted without feeling post-run foot and calf soreness. For many runners, the Escalante makes an effective to run in a few times a week to vary the stress, strengthen the feet, and cue different movement patterns鈥攚ithout getting so beat up they have to reduce mileage.

For other minimalist options, also look into:

And for an even more minimalist feel, consider sandals from:

The post The Best Minimalist Running Shoes appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

The biggest factors in marathon success are your training, pacing, hydration, and fueling鈥攂ut the right racing shoes can make all the difference. A well-chosen marathon shoe reduces impact, boosts energy return, and offers the cushioning and stability you need to cover 26.2 miles comfortably. As new marathon racing shoes come out, the 国产吃瓜黑料 team and I continually test them to determine the top picks. Here are the best marathon shoes you can buy today.

Updated August 2025: After testing new shoes released in summer 2025, we updated this guide, naming new winners in three categories: the PUMA Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 as the runner-up for best overall, the Asics Metaspeed Sky Tokyo as the most stable, and the Asics Megablast as the best for beginners.听

The post The 12 Best Marathon Racing Shoes for Every Type of Runner appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

You know the shoes Ruth Chepngetich and Eilud Kipchoge wear, partially responsible for some of the fastest marathon times ever recorded? Those are called super shoes. They鈥檙e thick-soled, with ultralight, hyper-responsive foam midsoles embedded with carbon-fiber plates. Think of super trainers as the more easygoing but still light and responsive cousins of super shoes. We sliced one open at our gear lab in Colorado to find out what makes them go zoom.

Midsole Foam

At the heart of every super shoe and super trainer is a thick slab of high-tech foam that鈥檚 lighter, softer, and bouncier than any other midsole material to date. It鈥檚 created by a process called supercritical foaming that combines heat, pressure, and liquid gas to infuse bubbles into elastic polymers like PEBA, TPEE, and ATPU. The resulting midsoles deliver plush cushioning and trampoline-like 颅rebound, but are squishy and unstable, requiring a balanced, 颅powerful stride to optimize performance.

Super shoes have full stacks of these soft, bouncy foams. However, many super trainers, like the shown here, use a combination of foams鈥攕ofter on top of firmer鈥攖o provide an energetic feel while delivering the kind of stride-supporting ride more suitable for a training shoe. The step-in feels soft underfoot, but when put through a heel-compression
test used to at the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab, the Deviate Nitro 3 super trainer was less squishy than all the racers we tested.

Traditional trainers use foams that are firmer and more supportive or are soft but not as bouncy鈥攗sually EVA or an EVA blend鈥攄elivering a more grounded, rolling ride.

Plate

All super shoes have a rigid, curved carbon-fiber plate embedded in the midsole. While many assume that this acts like a spring, research has shown that its role is to moderate the foam鈥檚 squish and channel its rebound, reducing energy loss and facilitating powerful push-offs.

Super trainers also typically have an embedded plate, but one with more flex. While rigid plates provide the most pop, they also dictate how the shoe rolls forward and can negatively alter the stride. A super trainer鈥檚 plate鈥攍ike the one in the Deviate Nitro 3, made of a carbon-composite weave with a forked forefoot shape鈥斅璦ccommodates a wider range of paces and strides and is less prone to bouncing feet in unproductive directions when form deteriorates from fatigue.

Plates differ in flex, shape, and location within the foam. This 颅affects how the foot rolls and interacts with the ground, and each feels different when combined with a runner鈥檚 unique stride.

Rocker

With the thick foam in many of today鈥檚 running shoes, the sole no longer flexes much at the ball of the foot. Instead, the foam鈥檚 height allows designers to cut away mass under the toe, creating a rocker shape. Rather than enabling the foot to flex as it moves through the stride, that shape allows the runner to roll off the toe while the foot remains in a neutral position. The rocker鈥檚 starting point, slope, and relationship to the plate all affect the shoe鈥檚 ride. In our measurements, the Deviate Nitro 3鈥檚 rocker started 8 percent later (closer to the toe) than the rocker on Puma鈥檚 Fast-R Nitro 2 racing super shoe, providing a stabler forefoot stance before rolling forward.

Outsole

A three-millimeter-thick rubber outsole covers more than 90 percent of the forefoot and all contact areas of the heel on the 颅Deviate Nitro 3. This provides better grip and durability than the sole of a racer, which needs to be as light as possible and so has rubber only in small, optimized zones.

Upper

Super-shoe racers have minimal uppers with scant padding and strong, secure grip to hold the foot in place at speed. A super trainer鈥檚 upper is more plush and durable but still lightweight, thanks to strategically placed fabrics that stretch, breathe, or 颅support as needed.

Featured Super Trainer

Puma Deviate Nitro 3听

Weight: 10.1 oz (men鈥檚)
Stack Height: 39 mm (heel); 29 mm (forefoot)
Drop: 10 mm

听

The post What Exactly Is a Super Trainer? appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

At a Glance

• The New World of Stability
• What to Look For in a Stability Shoe
• Beyond the Shoe
• What Shoes We Included
• How We Tested
• Best All-Around: Asics Kayano 31 ($165)
• Runner-up Best All-Around: Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 ($164)
• Best Plush Stability: Puma ForeverRUN Nitro 2 ($150)
• Runner-up Best Plush: Diadora Nucleo 2 ($160)
• Best Firm, Responsive Support: Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 ($140)
• Runner-up Best Firm Support: Topo UltraFly 5 ($140)
• Most Invisible Support: Altra Experience Form ($145)
• Best Full-Foot Support: New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 ($140)
• Best for Racing: Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 ($140)
• Best for Up-Tempo Days: Saucony Tempus 2 ($160)
• Best for Going Long: Mount to Coast P1 ($160)
• Best for Recovery Days: Hoka Gaviota 5 ($175)

The New World of Stability Shoes

Defining what makes a running shoe a stability shoe is getting increasingly difficult. That鈥檚 a good thing. Not long ago, you could easily identify a stability shoe by its firmer, darker-colored foam underneath the arch side of the foot called a medial post and designed to keep the foot from over pronation, the excessive inward rotation of the rearfoot. On the run, you could tell it was a stability shoe by its stiff, heavy, and controlling ride. Not anymore.

Today鈥檚 stability shoes are well-cushioned, smooth riding, and free from clunky controlling devices鈥攕o much so that they are, for the most part, equally comfortable for neutral runners as for those needing extra support. In place of the stiff medial post, designers are using a variety of less intrusive, more integrated strategies to help runners whose feet stray inward or outward.

It鈥檚 about time, given that the science showing that excessive pronation is rarely problematic and that traditional motion-control methods do little to control excessive motion has been around since the 1990s. But change has come slowly to an industry and a population steeped in the pronation paradigm. While the market for stability shoes鈥攁nd the number of stable shoe models鈥攈as decreased substantially in the past decade, only recently have we started to see major shifts in how a stability shoe looks and rides.

鈥淪tability is a function of so many features, such as sole geometry, stack height, midsole hardness, outsole, upper materials and how they are structured鈥攏ot just medial posting,鈥� says Kurt Stockbridge, product development vice president at Skechers. 鈥淓ach of these levers can be pushed and pulled to make a great stability shoe without it having to look like what we typically picture.鈥�

New stability shoe designs embrace the reality that every aspect of the shoe affects the ride, and the new strategies recognize and work to reduce the instability caused by the shoe itself as it distances the foot from the ground. Even many neutral shoes, not designed for or marketed as stability models, are being built with more stable platforms to compensate for the wobbliness of taller, more cushioned midsoles.

What to Look for in a Stability Shoe

The first, and most important feature to look for in a stability shoe is the width and shape.鈥� When I’m sending patients to the store, I’ll just tell them to look for a straighter lasted shoe,鈥� says Paul Langer, sports podiatrist with Twin Cities Orthopedics and past president of the American Association of Podiatric Sports Medicine. Straight lasted means the arch is filled in so there is a straight line following the edge of the sole from heel to ball, with full support under the arch. 鈥淎 really straight-lasted shoe, you can’t tell if it’s left or right,鈥� says Langer. 鈥淢ost shoes there’s a little bit of a curve鈥攖he less of a curve the more stable the shoe.鈥�

Langer considers this wide platform more important than the denser medial post, which long defined the stability category. 鈥淚f I’m talking about stability, I’m probably talking more about the shape of the shoe than the posting issue,鈥� he says.

The same is true for other stability features like guide rails, frames, plates, or heel counters. 鈥淚 split hairs less about those features,鈥� Langer says, referencing research that shows devices don鈥檛 control or correct overpronation. That said, he doesn鈥檛 dismiss stability strategies, which, he says, can mitigate some of the instability caused by squishing into soft foams. 鈥淪tability shoes don’t correct anything,鈥� Langer emphasizes. 鈥淭hey just might be less unstable than a neutral shoe.鈥�

Related to that squishy foam, Langer also says, 鈥淚 try to help my patients understand that a cushioned shoe is inherently less stable than your bare foot.鈥� Landing with two to three times your body weight on a thick layer of soft foam is, by nature, going to cause that foam to compress unevenly and exaggerate any imbalances. So, even though many shoes are being made with straighter, more filled-in lasts, the height and density of the foam need to be considered.

Finding the combination of cushioning, shape, and stability features that works for you involves running in multiple models and determining what feels best for your foot and stride. This 鈥�,鈥� which includes assessing what shoe provides the most natural-feeling alignment, is the best starting point we have, Langer says.

Emily Stefanski, sports podiatrist at Coastline Foot and Ankle in Connecticut and Rhode Island, and a D1 collegiate distance runner turned marathoner, concurs. 鈥淚 tell patients that it’s what feels best on the foot,鈥� she says. 鈥淚 have my guidelines, what I think is going to work. But that’s not always the case: there are so many factors.鈥�

Beyond the Shoe: Variety and Strength

Keep in mind that even when you find a shoe that complements your stride it . A handful of show that runners have a lower risk of injury when cycling through different pairs of shoes. 鈥淢ore important than finding the perfect shoe is appreciating that your feet need to stay strong and adaptable through having variety in your footwear and allowing your feet to have different stresses and loads,鈥� Langer says. So find a stability shoe that feels right for you as your daily trainer, but also have a minimalist shoe (even if just for walking or yard work), and sometimes run in a low, flexible trainer as well as a cushy, rockered one.

Stefanski also notes, 鈥淚 always try to push to a lot of strengthening.鈥� Coaches, physical therapists, biomechanists, and podiatrists agree that over-pronation and other stability issues usually , and can often be corrected by improving your mechanics throughout the chain from foot to hip. Stafanski says, 鈥淚 believe that we can improve over time and that most people don’t need to be in stability forever鈥攖hey can get out of the stability shoe. It’s how willing are people to do the exercises.鈥�

What Shoes We Included

Given the fluid definition of what makes a shoe stable, the selection criteria for a list of 鈥渟tability shoes鈥� is by nature somewhat arbitrary. We chose to include only models with some sort of structural device or design to influence the foot鈥檚 rotation.

We did not include plated shoes in this guide, although some runners find that the curved plates in super shoes and super trainers provide sufficient stability for their strides. Stefanski says, 鈥淚 have noticed with my hyper-flexible people, putting them into a carbon plated shoe, they’re perfect. They don’t need anything else.鈥� Others, however, find plated shoes exacerbate their instability (and ).

So, consider this a collection of shoes designed specifically for those who need, or want, help with keeping their feet from over-rotating, but recognize that it is not an exhaustive or exclusive list. Other models with wide bases of support and midsole geometries that reduce lateral torque and help guide the foot forward from landing to toe-off may be as stable as one of these models for you.

How We Tested Stability Shoes

After running in dozens of new shoe models this year, I sorted out those with stability features and completed multiple runs in each of them at a variety of distances and paces. Most models were also run in by more than 20 wear-testers who help select and inform the reviews in our best running shoe round-ups.

About me: I鈥檝e been a runner since the late 鈥�70s and a running magazine editor and shoe reviewer since 2000. I鈥檓 the author of , and . Once a 2:46 marathoner regularly doing 50+ mile weeks, injuries and age have reduced my volume by half and slowed my easy training pace. Those injuries have also given me rather complicated stability requirements. My left foot is high-arched and neutral, while my right foot has been weakened by strains and appreciates support. Too much medial support, however, makes my right knee hurt, as it has to pronate inward to off-load stress from a chronic condition. All of the above makes me well suited to test these new, less-prescriptive stability strategies which promise to adapt to the level of support you might need.

Best Stability Shoes 2025

Best All-Around

Asics GEL-Kayano 31

Weight: 10.8 oz (men鈥檚), 9.5 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 40鈥�30 mm (men鈥檚); 39鈥�29 mm (women鈥檚)
Drop: 10 mm

Stability Strategy: Soft, high-rebound medial post. Wide, flared base. Sculpted midsole.

Last year鈥檚 30th anniversary Kayano displayed the most radical transformation in stability strategy in the industry. For three decades the Kayano kept runners鈥� feet in line using a substantial medial post and a plastic midfoot support bridge. The Kayano 30鈥檚 new stability strategy, retained in the Kayano 31, replaced these firm, controlling devices with clever geometry and new, unobtrusive foot-guidance strategies.

The platform is wide from heel to toe, and flares even wider under the forefoot. The lateral side of the heel is sculpted out to let it compress more, smoothing and slowing the transition from heel contact to mid-stance. A corresponding bulge on the medial side reduces compression, plus the midsole wraps up along the side of the heel to cradle and subtly support.

Most unique, however, is a pod of softer, lower-density but highly responsive foam under the arch where previous versions had a firm medial post. Asics says this pod鈥檚 softness allows it to compress when loaded, increasing the effective midfoot width, and, because it鈥檚 higher rebounding than the main carrier, it encourages you to resupinate to an effective position as you鈥檙e coming out of midstance.

The thinking behind this new insert stems from research that shows it鈥檚 not the degree of pronation that predisposes a runner to injury but the . So instead of trying to block the foot鈥檚 rotation, the shoe simply returns it quickly to a neutral position.

On the run, I didn鈥檛 notice the rebound under the arch, but I did seem to sense its effect as my foot rolled onto the forefoot feeling upright, centered, and ready for a stable push-off. Overall, the shoe鈥檚 width made the greatest impression, both in terms of luxurious space鈥攚ithout feeling sloppy鈥攁nd the security of landing on and rolling over the generous platform. Despite the 40mm stack height, I didn鈥檛 even feel high off the ground, thanks to the lack of any tippiness, the well-balanced combination of cushion and responsiveness, and the surprisingly flexible forefoot. The ride, though not particularly fast, is smooth with no hint of stiff control, yet both of my asymmetrical feet felt cared for and supported鈥攅specially on longer runs when I started to tire.

The 31鈥檚 new, engineered mesh upper complemented the smooth ride and secured my foot comfortably with plush, but not excessive, padding. Asics also reduced the lateral heel flare, which created some unwanted rotational torque on landing in the Kayano 30, leaving a beveled curve that eased my foot down to the ground even with a heavy heel strike.

Altogether, the Kayano 31 is a shoe that can be worn by nearly any runner and delivers comfort and support that not only stays out of the way but also seems to reduce fatigue.

Runner-up Best All-Around

Brooks Glycerin GTS 22

Weight: 10.7 oz (men鈥檚), 9.5 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 38鈥�28 mm
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Guide rails. Tuned midsole foam. Wide, straight shape.

Last year we named the Glycerin GTS 21 鈥淏est All-Around Stability Shoe鈥� in our larger road shoe round-up for its blend of plush comfort and stable support. The 22nd version combines Brook鈥檚 familiar GuideRails鈥攔aised sidewalls along the top of the midsole on both sides of the rearfoot, firmer on the arch side鈥攚ith something entirely new: tuned midsole foam.

What鈥檚 unique about Brooks鈥� nitrogen-infused tuned midsole, which we , is that it is softer on the outside and firmer on the inside鈥攁 little bit firmer in the heel, a lot in the forefoot鈥攚ithin the same slab of foam. New technology allows Brooks to tune the properties of different sections of a foam midsole during its manufacture.

Carson Caprara, senior vice president of footwear at Brooks, says that they inject two different chemistries into the midsole mold before the supercritical gas-infusion process. 鈥淭hen when it hits the high-pressure nitrogen infusion, the two cell structures act differently,鈥� he explains, 鈥淭he inner cell structures stay pretty small and tight and the outer structures blow up a little bit more and create more softness and forgiveness. It鈥檚 done without seams and ridges. And so, therefore, it just feels more consistent throughout.鈥�

Brooks tunes the foam so that the midsole has a higher percentage of large cells in the heel to cushion landings, then the mix transitions to mostly smaller cells in the responsive forefoot. The result is a ride that feels both softer, as the outer foam cushions and compresses on impact, and firmer, as my weight transfers smoothly onto the forefoot and pushes off. I found my feet felt more protected while simultaneously more connected in the new model than in the Glycerin 21, as I powered nimbly off the ground, and miles went by faster than expected.

The combination of guide rails in the rear, the firmer, tuned foam up front, and a slightly more filled-in shape under the arch, delivered mostly non-intrusive stability from touch down to toe-off. I could, however, feel the pressure of the guide rail under my arch more than in previous versions, especially toward the front where the foam under it firmed up. This was comfortingly supportive for my foot that needs bolstering but felt a bit controlling for my neutral foot. That lack of versatility kept us from naming the Glycerin 22 best all-around, but the stronger support makes it a better choice for those who want the guidance.

Best Plush Stability

Puma ForeverRUN Nitro 2

Weight: 10.7 oz (men鈥檚); oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 38鈥�28 mm
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Firmer-foam frame. Wide, straight shape.

Puma鈥檚 nitrogen-infused TPE foam delivers one of the smoothest rides in the business for my stride, deftly decelerating landings and transitioning to a lively toe-off. The ForeverRUN Nitro 2 uses two densities of that foam鈥攁 softer core inside a firmer perimeter frame鈥攖o add stability to the ride without trying to control the foot. Conor Cashin, senior product line manager at Puma, says, 鈥淲e looked at the and we really tried to focus on slowing that speed down but still allowing runners to pronate to a certain extent because it鈥檚 the body鈥檚 natural way of cushioning itself.鈥�

In this updated version, the two foams are co-molded rather than stacked and glued together, making the interaction between them smoother. 鈥淲e were able to bring the soft nitro foam all the way to the ground and all the way through the foot,鈥� Cashin says. 鈥淪o it gives you more cushioning, more responsiveness鈥攁nd then the firm nitro around the foot is where you get that stability control.鈥�

The sole is also significantly wider鈥攑articularly in the midfoot under the arch鈥攆or enhanced stability, and two millimeters thicker, adding to the plushness underfoot. But the engineered, circular-knit upper is where this shoe truly coddles, hugging the heel with a well-padded collar, wrapping smoothly around the foot with a gentle stretch, and locking down the midfoot with light, printed, reinforcing overlays.

On the run, the ride impressed me first for its smooth cushioning (as expected), without anything trying to rearrange my stride. Yet, thanks to the wide stance and firmer rim, it didn鈥檛 feel at all tippy, despite the high stack underfoot. I noticed the frame primarily under my big toe where it felt less squishy when my weight rolled inward, providing a welcome stable base for me to roll forward on and push off from. While the plushness of the shoe makes it well-suited for easy days, the midsole鈥檚 bounce and roll are spry enough to handle tempo runs or pick-ups without holding you back.

Runner-up, Plush Stability

Diadora Nucleo 2

Weight: 9.7 oz (men鈥檚); 7.4 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 35鈥�30 mm
Drop: 5 mm
Stability Strategy: Asymmetrical geometry. Wide, straight shape. Sidewalls. Responsive foam.

The first thing I wrote on my test summary after a run in the Nucleo 2 was 鈥渟mooth rolling ride鈥攃ushioned and supportive.鈥� The cushioned roll can be credited to the thickness of the foam under the ball and toes (thanks to a low, 5-millimeter drop) that sinks in and lowers the foot gently into the quick, late-stage rocker. The support stems from the push-back of that foam, catching the squish and providing a lively base underfoot.

Stability is created simply with geometry: the wide midsole foam has cut-out grooves along the outside to allow more compression and is filled in under the arch to limit the squish and provide more support. Raised sidewalls on both sides gently cradle and center the rearfoot.

On the run, all I felt was a fullness of foam under the arch side that wasn鈥檛 firm or obtrusive but provided a comforting sense of solidity. The plushly padded upper and gusseted tongue coddled my foot while holding it securely. My only negative note was that the heel flared a bit much on the outside of the heel and created some torque on touchdown when going slow with a strong heel strike.

The Nucleo 2鈥檚 stability guidance is subtle enough a neutral runner wouldn鈥檛 notice it, making this daily trainer versatile enough for all but those needing strong, rotational support. I found myself reaching for this shoe both on days when I wanted comfort and days when I was ready to cruise.

Best for Firm, Responsive Support

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24

Weight: 8.0 oz (women鈥檚); 10.0 oz (men鈥檚)
Stack Height: 35.5鈥�23.5 mm
Drop: 12 mm
Stability Strategy: Guide rails. Wide, straight base. Firmly responsive midsole.

Way back in 2019, Brooks dropped the dense, full-height medial post on the Adrenaline, its signature stability model, and replaced it with what they call GuideRails, now found on the stability version of all their shoes. These support structures are strips of raised foam on top of the midsole, stretching from the heel up to the middle of the arch on both sides鈥攆irmer on the medial (arch) side to reduce inward roll, and the same density as the midsole on the outer rim to keep the heel from sliding outward. The rails deliver lighter, more cushioned, and smoother support than a full post. Plus, they are less prescriptive, engaging the foot only when needed, thus working for a wider range of runners.

鈥淸The GuideRail] doesn鈥檛 go all the way down to the ground, so it gives the shoe a little bit of play,鈥� says Jon Teipen, principal footwear product line manager at Brooks. 鈥淚t鈥檚 not going to be a firm block on the medial side of the shoe. The more you evert [roll inward], the more the GuideRail will push back on you.鈥�

The updated nitrogen-infused EVA-blend midsole foam on this year鈥檚 Adrenaline is lighter and noticeably softer, but still tuned to support more than squish, giving the shoe a surprisingly peppy feel. An engineered mesh upper provides a secure and comfortable fit, hugging the midfoot with a double-layer reinforced arch panel while staying airy and flexible up front. The 12-millimeter drop, moderate stack height, flexible forefoot, and palpable support under the arch鈥攚hich is more filled-in with a straighter last this year鈥攇ive the Adrenaline 24 the most traditional stable-shoe feel of this group.

Still, unlike the stiff, clunky Adrenalines of old, I found the ride smooth and nonintrusive, with just a bit of supportive rearfoot cradling. Both the cushioning and support seem to shine most when landing on my heel and rolling through the stride, but the connected ride also responded nicely when I picked up the pace and stayed on my toes. With this versatility and dependable support, I could easily wear the Adrenaline as my daily go-to trainer.

Runner-up Best Firm, Responsive Support

Topo UltraFly 5

Weight: 9.9 oz (men鈥檚), 8.0 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 30鈥�25 mm
Drop: 5 mm
Stability Strategy: Medial post. Wide forefoot with big toe flare. Low drop. Straight shape.

Topo鈥檚 long-run shoe combines traditional features like a medial post with a minimalist-inspired design. The palpable stability in the UltraFly 5鈥檚 ride stems mostly from its wide forefoot (flared under the big toe), low, 5mm drop, and moderate stack of relatively firm, responsive foam. And, yes, a wedge of firmer foam lies under the arch to reduce compression and rotation. But it is only half the midsole height at its thickest under the arch, and tapers off as it reaches forward to the ball of the foot and back to the heel. Combined, the midsole provided a gentle, full-foot feeling of solidity as my foot rotated inward, without blocking any natural movement.

On the run, what stood out most was the generous forefoot width: the upper allows enough splay to wear full CorrectToes comfortably and the base is wide enough underfoot for a confident stance and powerful toe-off without any tippiness. That athletic stance is enhanced by the ride of Topo鈥檚 lightweight, responsive ZipFoam that gives way just enough to ease landings while keeping ground contact quick and responsively connected. The midfoot-foot-hugging upper complimented the openness of the forefoot and let me relax in the luxury without fear of sliding.

It鈥檚 not the sveltest shoe, but it rides lightly even while protecting and supporting. Every time I wore it I felt my stride quicken and my awareness of my stride sharpen, making me more efficient as the run went on. My toes and feet engaged and my posture got taller. No matter how tired I was when I started (and I loved these on recovery days when feeling beat-up), I was always sad to end my runs in the UltraFly 5.

Most Invisible Support

Altra Experience Form

Weight: 9.6 oz (men鈥檚), 7.8 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 32鈥�28 mm (men鈥檚); 30鈥�26 mm (women鈥檚)
Drop: 4 mm
Stability Strategy: Guide rails. Wide forefoot. Low drop. Straight shape.

All Altra shoes achieve stability through a balanced, low-drop platform combined with a wide toe box that lets your foot spread out and supports your stance naturally. This allows the brand to use soft, bouncy foams, rather than stiff platforms and rigid control devices鈥攍ong before other companies began playing with geometry.

The stability model of their new 4mm drop line, the Experience Form, also has guide rails on both sides of the heel. This elevated rim, higher on the arch side, is the same density as the rest of the midsole, creating a cradling effect that gently resists rotation without any controlling pressure. A straight-shaped base, with the arch filled in more than other Experience models, provides a full-foot supportive platform. The engineered mesh upper is clean and simple, but secure and comfortable, gripping the heel and midfoot and staying out of the way of the toes.

I found the Experience Form鈥檚 ride soft but responsive, less squishy and bouncy than many of today鈥檚 shoes thanks to a moderate stack height of CMEVA. The shoe feels light and nimble, encouraging quick ground contact and a fast roll off the toe that has both a gentle rocker and a smooth, natural flex. The stability features were completely unobtrusive and invisible on the run, but footplants felt connected and supported whether striding easily or pushing the pace. Whatever the pace planned for the day, I often found myself doing pick-ups before I was done, and enjoying the combination of light, quick responsiveness, connected comfort, and subtle support.

Best Full-Foot Support

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

Weight: 10.7 oz (men鈥檚), 8.6 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 35.5鈥�27.5 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Stability Strategy: Angled plate with dual-density midsole. Wide, straight base.

All of the embedded plates popular in today鈥檚 running shoes function mostly to stabilize the squish and rebound of thick stacks of soft and responsive foam. While most plates, such as those found in marathon-racing super shoes, focus on directing and enhancing forward roll and push-off, some serve primarily to moderate lateral roll, like Skechers鈥� winglet and H plates, or the midfoot wings on the plastic plate in the Saucony Endorphin Speed.

The plate in New Balance鈥檚 completely remade 860, which replaces a traditional firm medial post, takes rotational guidance a step further. The semi-flexible EVA film, first seen in the Vongo, is sandwiched between two foam layers (soft over firm), and angled so it is higher on the medial, or arch side, and lower on the lateral side. This results in a bottom wedge with more firm foam under the arch side, and a top wedge that puts more soft foam on the outer, landing side. The plate also has hexagonal cutouts that reduce its rigidity on the lateral side but is solid on the medial side. Both the wedges and the cutouts help create a soft, smooth landing and slow the inward foot rotation without creating a clunky transition or compromising cushioning.

The 860 v14鈥檚 plate isn鈥檛 just about defining that angled wedge, however, says Paul Zielinski, senior global product manager at New Balance. Research in their lab revealed that midsole foams stretch under force when the foot is pronating far or at high velocity. The plate, Zielinski says, 鈥淎llows for the foam to be a little more structured, and not stretch or shear as much. Working in combination with the two different midsole hardness foams, this system is helping stabilize the structure of the platform so the foot feels guided all the way from heel to toe.鈥�

Additional midsole foam under the forefoot due to a lower heel-toe drop, a beveled heel, and an increased rocker profile provide a smooth rolling transition from midfoot to toe-off.

On my foot, the plate and dual-density foam provided the strongest full-foot rotational support of any shoe in this group. While the midsole was soft underfoot, and delivered a light, cushioned and smooth ride, my feet pronated very little. The control didn鈥檛 irritate my neutral left foot, but, fairly quickly, I could feel the bones in my right knee-that-must-pronate start to rub as it wasn鈥檛 tracking inward at all, and the tendons around my right ankle hurt after runs from fighting against the firmer wedge of the midsole.

With its strong medial support, the 860 v14 is not quite as versatile for neutral runners as some other options in this guide, but it鈥檚 a solid choice for those who want to slow pronation velocity in a shoe that delivers a smooth, comfortable transition from landing to toe-off.

Best for Racing

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2

Weight: 7.6 oz (men鈥檚), 6.9 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 31.5鈥�23.5 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Stability Strategy: Rearfoot guide rails. Low-profile midsole with quick-rebounding foam.

The second version of the speedy Hyperion GTS is updated with a slightly thicker stack of a new nitrogen-infused EVA-blend midsole compound, which Brooks says is lighter weight and more responsive than its predecessor. That felt true on the run: the foam seemed to push back even while compressing, and rebounded impressively, making the ride lively and inspiring me to pick up the pace.

Like other GTS models in the Brooks line, the Hyperion GTS 2 features stabilizing guide rails along the sides of the heel and midfoot鈥攁 raised extension of the midsole foam on the outside, a firmer foam piece on the arch side鈥攖o help reduce heel shift and rotation for runners whose stride strays excessively inward or outward, especially towards the end of their run as a result of fatigue. I didn鈥檛 notice them at all on the run, except for a lack of any rearfoot tippiness. More significant was a feeling of stable connectedness from the lower-profile midsole, relatively wide base, and lack of squish, enabling quick strides and stable push-offs.

That ground feel isn鈥檛 at all minimal, however. The foam cushions smoothly and delivers a comfortable ride at any pace, making them suitable as a daily trainer for someone who doesn鈥檛 prefer a tall, squishy feel underfoot, now nearly ubiquitous in the industry. But most runners will appreciate Hyperion GTS 2 as a light, springy, non-plated, up-tempo trainer and racer that doesn鈥檛 beat your feet up and gently supports as necessary in the later miles. Bonus is the new, airy mesh upper.

Best for Up-Tempo Days

Saucony Tempus 2

Weight: 8.2 oz (women鈥檚); 9.4 oz (men鈥檚)
Stack Height: 33鈥�25 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Stability Strategy: Over-under frame with strategic placement of complementary foams

The Tempus lies at the sharp end of the stability spectrum, delivering a lively ride that made me feel nimble, bouncy, and fast鈥攜et still providing foot guidance and support. The shoe鈥檚 secret lies in its midsole, which features ultralight, high-cushioning, and maximum-rebounding鈥攂ut usually unstable鈥擯ebax foam at its core, here surrounded by a denser, more supportive EVA frame.

Using a firmer frame to control a softer foam鈥檚 squish is not new or unique. Most models with frames, however, surround the bottom of the full shoe with firmer material. While this provides a stable stance, it makes landings harsher and can accelerate the foot鈥檚 movement as it impacts the edge of the sole and rotates inward. The Tempus, however, employs a unique over-under frame that sits atop the soft Pebax in the heel, bridges the full midsole height under the arch, then dives under the Pebax in the forefoot and runs along the bottom edges up to the toe.

The magic of this frame is that by putting the Pebax on the bottom at the heel, its softness works to reduce the instability caused by the shoe. On impact, it compresses and deforms, rounding the edge of the sole and creating a smooth, gentle transition as the foot rolls inward and forward. Meanwhile, the firmer frame that surrounds the top of the heel wraps the foot and keeps it centered on the platform. The full-height frame under the arch slows the foot鈥檚 rotation and supports as needed. Up front, you feel the Pebax鈥檚 cushioning and rebound directly underfoot, while the firmer foam on the bottom adds a bit of rigidity to the rocker for quick-rolling toe-offs.

The updated engineered mesh upper on version 2 holds the midfoot more securely, enhancing the connection between foot and shoe and the shoe鈥檚 ability to perform at speed.

On the run, not only did the Tempus provide one of the snappiest, most-fun rides of the group, it also seemed best at managing my varied stability needs. The soft Pebax on the bottom of the heel let both feet stay in a natural, supinated position on landing without torquing me inward like several of the shoes with stiffer flared heels did. As my foot rolled inward, the shoe provided my more-mobile right foot effective, but almost undetectable, support while I transitioned over the arch to the stable toe-off, yet didn鈥檛 block the pronation I needed for my knee. Meanwhile, my neutral left foot didn鈥檛 feel any control or clunkiness, just the smooth, comfy, responsive Pebax underfoot.

The Tempus is narrower than other stability shoes in the heel and midfoot鈥攔elying on the firmer frame rather than more foam for arch support鈥攂ut spreads out as wide as any in the forefoot. It鈥檚 also low enough up front to provide the ground feel necessary for a solid, propulsive push-off, and flexible enough to allow a natural roll at any pace or stride angle. The shoe felt responsive and fast at any pace, but the subtle support was always present, and the farther I ran, the more I appreciated the shoe鈥檚 guided roll and side-to-side stability.

The Tempus can be a peppy daily trainer or a solid marathon shoe for someone who wants the bounciness of Pebax with some foot bolstering during the long miles, and it is an excellent long-run training shoe for someone who plans to race in a carbon-plated super shoe.

Best for Going Long

Mount to Coast P1

Weight: 9.9 oz (men鈥檚 size 9, women鈥檚 size 10.5)
Stack Height: 37鈥�27 mm
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Guiding geometry and midsole insert. Arch wrap. Centering insole.

Mount to Coast is a new brand specializing in building shoes for ultra-runners. But my experience in the shoes leads me to believe that you can enjoy and benefit from them without running all day.

The P1, Mount to Coast鈥檚 stability model, has the same nitrogen-infused, PEBA-based midsole found in their , delivering a soft, bouncy, and flexible ride that feels more connected than the 37-millimeter heel might suggest. The responsive foam, tuned firmer than the PEBA found in super shoe racers, provides soft contouring underfoot, then firms up quickly to deliver a tactile ground feel. The resulting smooth ride feels almost minimalist in allowing natural foot motion and ground sensitivity鈥攚hile still dampening harsh landings.

The shape also feels inspired by minimalist design, echoing the foot with a snug heel and secure wrap of the instep, opening up to a flared forefoot鈥攑articularly under the big toe鈥攑roviding roomy space and a stable platform for a fully-splayed foot. That stability is enhanced by an s-shaped insert of flexible plastic that extends from the outside midfoot to under the big toe, providing added support under the natural path of forefoot rotation. Mount to Coast鈥檚 research indicates that reducing excess forefoot rotation is more important than correcting the heel rotation that most stability shoe design focuses on, and that their device not only improves foot alignment but helps activate the arch muscles.

Running in the P1, the shoe delivered a smooth, natural heel-toe transition, and I could feel a subtle extra firmness under the ball, which helped my foot achieve a stable stance and push-off. More noticeable, however, was the dual-zone insole that centered and cradled my heel, and the arch wrap built into the upper and tied into the lacing that made my foot feel like it was expertly wrapped with athletic tape鈥攈ugging, supporting, and moving with the changing shape of my foot through the stride.

The flexible P1 stayed out of the way when I picked up the pace, but it didn鈥檛 feel like it was reducing the effort like some rockered models do. At all-day paces, however, it helped me quickly fall into a comfortable, efficient rhythm that churned out miles so comfortably and easily that I inevitably extended my runs in the shoe as long as time allowed.

Best for Recovery Days

Hoka Gaviota 5

Weight: 9.1 oz (women鈥檚); 10.9 oz (men鈥檚)
Stack Height: 34鈥�28 mm (women鈥檚); 36鈥�30 mm (men鈥檚)
Drop: 6 mm
Stability Strategy: Softer-foam H-Frame. Wide, straight shape. Sidewalls.

Despite their high stack heights, Hoka鈥檚 shoes have always had inherent stability from their wide platform, low drop, and cockpit-like cradle surrounding the heel as it sits down into the top of the midsole. For years their stability models have also used a 鈥淛-frame鈥� to provide more rotational control. This firmer-density foam reinforced the midsole at the full height of the arch side of the shoe and wrapped around to the lateral side on the bottom edge.

The redesigned Gaviota 5 retains the wide geometry and raised sidewalls, but swaps the J-frame for a new H-frame. This layer of less-dense foam lies on top of the midsole and surrounds the perimeter of the shoe with a connective piece across the middle鈥攆orming a figure eight shape. As the foot sinks into this layer, it nests deeper in the foot frame created by the sidewalls of the more stable, but still cushioned, bottom layer. Hoka says the H-frame allows them to use softer foams than before to deliver inherent stability while enhancing cushioning, especially close to the foot.

On the run, the frame was all but invisible, its presence only noted by a feeling of centeredness as I sunk into the forgiving footbed. It is enough, however, combined with the ample width and secure hold of the flexible-but-not-stretchy creel jacquard upper, to keep the well-cushioned shoe from feeling at all tippy. While it doesn鈥檛 make any pretense of reducing inward rotation, the full-foot stability kept both of my feet and knees feeling safely coddled no matter how long I ran.

The post The Best Stability Shoes for Every Type of Run (2025) appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

In the past two years,听 a handful of brands have leaned into鈥攐r doubled down on鈥攖he category of shoe that can both run smoothly on pavement and keep you from falling on your face on a trail. Several brands, like Craft Sportswear and Salomon, have introduced what they鈥檙e calling their 鈥淕ravel鈥� category of shoes, aiming to piggyback on the explosion in popularity of gravel cycling.

I鈥檓 a fan of the increased attention to the category, as I have always run a mix of road and trail within one run and love a good shoe that can handle multiple types of surfaces. But I鈥檓 finding there鈥檚 a difference between true road-to-trail shoes and gravel shoes.

What Road-to-Trail Shoes Excel At

A true road-to-trail shoe is perfect for my favorite neighborhood loop, which looks something like this: Walk down a sidewalk past a few houses to a path that cuts through the middle of a community garden. There, I run across wood chips, weeds, and hard dirt. Hit the sidewalk and run concrete for about a mile, crossing two busy streets and chugging up a steep, quarter-mile-long hill. At mile 1.3, I hit the ribbon of dirt next to a sidewalk that takes me to rocky singletrack through tall grasses up, and then down, a very steep, loose, rocky hill with a killer view of the Boulder Flatirons. Negotiate a very narrow, windy strip of dirt next to a sidewalk. Cross a paved street. Run tight singletrack through grassland over rocks and ruts and that climbs gradually, then steeply to the highpoint of my run. Descend a dirt fire road riddled with rocks and ruts and with steep wooden steps at the bottom. Run pavement roughly a half-mile downhill, hop up onto the sidewalk, cross a busy street. Run on concrete sidewalks home.

For the kind of runs where the surface changes from road to trail and back a few times, I want a shoe that can handle all sorts of terrain. A straight-up road running shoe and its cushioning and flexibility would offer a smooth ride on the paved sections, but lack traction, protection, and security on the trail segments. A trail-specific shoe, on the other hand, would keep me sure-footed and secure on the rugged dirt sections, but would feel clunky on the road.

I basically want a well-cushioned shoe with traction that doesn鈥檛 clunk on roads but that makes me surefooted on dirt, and that keeps my foot secure and comfortable. And I want that shoe to be 鈥渞unnable鈥濃�攆lexible like a road shoe, not stiff like a hiking shoe.

The kind of dirt I run on this loop (and many other road-to-trail routes I run) is not mild crushed gravel; it鈥檚 more rugged than that. For that reason, I need a shoe that has lugs that grip and an upper that secures my foot in place. I don鈥檛 want my foot sloshing around on a technical trail, especially going up- or downhill.

What Gravel Shoes Excel At

Gravel shoes, in contrast, excel on just that: gravel. They have lightweight, comfortable uppers like road shoes, with some midfoot hold, just not as much as many trail shoes. Their outsoles mimic gravel bike tires, with small lugs in the center and larger ones on the perimeter of the shoes鈥攖o roll smoothly while gripping loose gravel. In shoes with this lug pattern, you don鈥檛 have to worry about spinning out on loose dirt or gravel like you would in road running shoes.

Today鈥檚 gravel shoes kick the snot out of pure road running shoes for running on groomed trails like the gravel path around the Boulder reservoir or the dirt backroads of the high plains. They also run much more smoothly on road than most trail running shoes. But road-to-gnarly trail runs require midfoot hold and better traction than many gravel shoes offer.

My point: There鈥檚 a difference between road-to-trail and gravel shoes, there鈥檚 a time and place for each, and I appreciate both. Here are my current favorites from the latest releases in both categories.

My Favorite Road-to-Trail Running Shoes

Nike Pegasus Trail 5

9.5 oz (men鈥檚); 8.5oz (women鈥檚); 9.5mm offset

This shoe has become my favorite road-to-trail pick, mostly because the midfoot hold feels secure enough to give me confidence on rugged trails, not just flat, gravel roads. I credit the Flywire technology鈥攖hin, lightweight but strong thread鈥攃onnecting the laces to the strobel board (underneath the insole) for that secure feel. Nike鈥檚 ReactX midsole foam feels lively on roads without being too thick or bouncy on trails. The outsole rubber鈥擭ike鈥檚 All Terrain Compound (ATC)鈥攊sn鈥檛 as grippy as the Vibram Megagrip on Nike鈥檚 Ultrafly trail shoe, but the low-profile (3.5mm lugs) do a decent job on technical trails and run fairly smooth on roads. I also like how the rubber wraps around the front of the shoe to protect my toes if (when) kicking rocks and roots.

Best for: Those who want a comfortable, good-looking, truly versatile shoe that can handle rugged trails and run relatively smoothly on roads. This is a good travel shoe.

Craft Nordlite Ultra

9.3 ounces (men鈥檚), 8.1 ounces (women鈥檚); 6mm offset

This shoe, my top pick last year, still ranks among my favorites for road-to-trail runs. An ample amount of responsive cushioning (40mm under the heel and 34mm under the forefoot) helps this shoe to feel great on hard surfaces, both road and super-firm Colorado dirt. The heel and forefoot portions of the mid- and outsole are decoupled, allowing each segment to move slightly independently, which I find works great on rocky terrain and pavement alike. It鈥檚 flexible for smooth running on roads and gives me agility on the trails as it morphs around rocks, delivering a unique ride that I really enjoy. The outsole鈥檚 3.5mm lugs鈥攕ome smaller, some larger鈥攄o a great job grabbing both loose surfaces and rock while not being so deep that they feel cumbersome on roads. The one-piece mesh upper is comfortable, but I sometimes crave a bit more support/foothold on technical trail sections.

Best for: Those who like a flexible sole with substantial cushioning, a comfortable upper, and enough grip to tackle mildly technical trails.

On Cloudvista 2

10.5 ounces (men鈥檚), 8.6 ounces (women’s); 6mm offset

This shoe surprised me, perhaps because of its inconspicuous looks鈥攖he monomesh upper is sleek and somewhat hides some key performance features within the shoe. The mesh on its own keeps out debris and worked great in fresh snow, shedding moisture, even though it鈥檚 not necessarily geared toward water-resistance. And underneath that mesh is a webbing system connecting the laces at the midfoot to underneath the insole (somewhat similar to the Nike Flywire system). The effect is a secure foothold that allowed me to tackle technical terrain without feeling like my feet were slipping within the shoe. On roads, the proprietary Helion foam (gas infused for lightness and rebound) and On鈥檚 Cloudtec pods feel responsive underfoot, while the 3mm traction lugs weren鈥檛 clunky. A two-pronged, semi-flexible speedboard inserted in the midsole adds to the underfoot stability and responsiveness鈥攁nd delivers the classic On ride. One knock: A thin tongue and thin laces made for some pressure on the top of the foot.

Best for: On devotees, those who want exceptional foothold, a stable ride, and responsiveness for road-to-rugged trails or gravel.

My Favorite Gravel Running Shoes

Craft Xplor

10.5 ounces (men鈥檚), 8.8 ounces (women鈥檚); 6mm offset

Craft goes all-in to the gravel shoe category with the Xplor. The outsole pattern鈥攕maller lugs down the center and larger around the perimeter鈥攁re meant to mimic a gravel bike tire. It鈥檚 a design the brand developed with cycling brand Vittoria, and it grips loose dirt and gravel as intended, while staying out of the way when the surface is smooth and firm. Craft鈥檚 proprietary Px foam (40mm under the heel and 34mm under the forefoot) provides a lively, fun, joint-saving platform for both road and hard dirt/gravel surfaces. The midsole noticeably flares out from the upper, which, combined with the ample foam, creates a stable ride. When the terrain turned to anything off-camber, steep, or technical, I craved a more nimble feel from a more secure midfoot hold.

听Best for: Those who run road-to-gravel, road-to-smooth, flat dirt, gravel only.

On Cloudsurfer Trail

9.7 ounces (men鈥檚), 8.3 ounces (women鈥檚); 7mm offset

This is a very comfortable, smooth-running shoe. The brand鈥檚 CloudTec Phase tech鈥攐pen pods in the midsole made out of Helion foam, a proprietary gas-infused Pebax blend鈥攁re soft and cushy. The shoe has a slight toe spring, which seems to help it roll smoothly on roads and mild off-road terrain. The outsole features low-profile lugs made out of the brand鈥檚 MissionGrip, which does a good job even on rock. But what keeps this shoe off my 鈥渇avorites鈥� list for my go-to local loop is the somewhat loose-feeling upper. It鈥檚 a comfortable upper, but it doesn鈥檛 hold my narrow foot securely enough to let me hop around rocks and ruts with confidence. Still, this is a smooth-rolling, versatile shoe if you keep it on the gravel.

Best for: Those looking for a super-smooth ride on roads, paths, and light trails.

Salomon DRX Defy Grvl

8.7 ounces (men鈥檚), 8.0 ounces (women鈥檚); 8mm offset

The DRX Defy Grvl is Salomon鈥檚 foray into the cross-over shoe category, and they鈥檙e going all-in with the name and design of this shoe. Like the Craft XPLOR, the outsole is modeled after a gravel bike tire, with small lugs in the center (although, only under the forefoot), and larger, chevron-shaped lugs around the perimeter. The pattern works well on gravel and loose dirt. With its Active Chassis鈥攖he brand鈥檚 siderails made of dense foam to offer guidance鈥攖his shoe feels more like a stable road shoe than others on this list. Negative space in the middle of the outsole/midsole also adds a dampening effect, adding to the road shoe-like feel. The upper has enough structure to keep feet from sloshing around on trails, but the shoe feels more at home on moderate rather than rugged terrain.

Best for: Those seeking mild stability in a road-to-gentle trail/gravel crossover shoe. Those who prioritize a lightweight shoe.

Hoka Challenger 7

8.9 ounces (men鈥檚), 7.7 ounces (women鈥檚); 5mm offset

I鈥檓 putting the Challenger 7 to the 鈥淕ravel鈥� section of this season鈥檚 roundup mostly because it doesn鈥檛 handle technical terrain as well as some of the others. I chalk that up to the thick midsole (31mm/26mm for men, 29mm/24mm for women), which makes the shoe more of a monster truck than a ninja. It rolls over terrain, but lacks midfoot stability and ground feel, which makes me a little trepidatious on the technical stuff despite 4mm lugs made of a fairly basic durabrasion rubber. The company says the outsole pattern鈥攕mall lugs in the center, larger around the perimeter of the shoe鈥攊s inspired by gravel bike tires, and the Challenger ATR 7 is super comfortable, and capable, on smooth gravel terrain.

Best for: Hoka devotees, those seeking max cush, heavier runners, those who run gravel roads and road-to-smooth-trail routes.

The post My Favorite Road-to-Trail and Gravel Running Shoes appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

I鈥檓 getting ready for my first marathon in the fall, and I am trying to dial in my kit. I keep hearing about these 鈥渟uper shoes鈥� people use for racing, but they鈥檙e expensive, and I don鈥檛 know if I should switch to something new for race day. Do I need to buy a super shoe to run my best? 鈥擭ewbie Distance Runner

Dear Newbie,

Super shoes are no doubt attractive. The lightweight racers with ultra-bouncy foam and embedded carbon plates have been shown to enable some athletes to reach higher speeds with less effort.

Could a super shoe help you run slightly faster and easier than you would in a standard trainer or racer? Yes. Probably. Maybe. It鈥檚 complicated.

If you鈥檙e a sub-seven-minute-mile marathoner, you鈥檝e established serious training habits and built a strong, athletic stride. And in that pace range, the research says you鈥檒l likely get a 3 or 4 percent improvement in running economy from the shoes. This is why no elite runner would toe the line in anything but a super shoe.

But as a first-time marathoner, do you need that edge? Will it be impossible for you to accomplish your goals without these shoes鈥� performance-enhancing benefits? No, absolutely not. And there are some good reasons why you might not want to invest in a super shoe.

Research on the benefits for slower runners is mixed. One data analysis of slower marathoners showed time improvements鈥攅ven greater than among faster runners鈥攁fter adopting super shoes. In contrast, a controlled study revealed that the slower the runner, the lower the boost in running economy, with 9:40-mile runners seeing only about 1 percent improvement.

Still, any help is appreciated in the marathon, and some experts believe that the real advantage may have more to do with the shoes鈥� ability to reduce muscle breakdown and fatigue than with improvements in efficiency. If super shoes make finishing strong more likely, they might be worth the $250-plus price tag.

Be aware, however, that nearly a third of the slower runners in the same study showed a decrease in running economy鈥攖he shoes made running harder, not easier. Other studies have found even greater variability in runner response.

This is partially due to the fine-tuned bounce and roll of a super shoe鈥檚 midsole and plate. Every runner鈥檚 stride is unique and interacts with the shoe differently. When we staged a 国产吃瓜黑料 Online鈥�with three runners comparing 16 different super shoes head-to-head鈥攚e found that a shoe that felt magical to one runner often went clunk on another.

Even if a shoe seems good when you are fresh and running strong, it might not be what you want on your foot when you start to tire. Super shoes exacerbate any stride imbalances because of a trampoline-like action that magnifies all forces and movements, for better or worse. Can you maintain the even posture and powerful push-off that a super shoe requires over 26.2 miles? A tall, wobbly platform isn鈥檛 what anyone wants when doing the marathon shuffle. For slower, first-time marathoners, the risk of a super shoe impeding their efforts may not be worth the meager potential reward, especially at these prices.

If you decide to go with a super shoe, be sure to test out multiple models to find one that enhances your natural gait rather than changing it or, worse, fighting against it.

Regardless of what you choose for race day, remember that the first rule of marathoning is to dance with the one who brought you: if in doubt, go with old friends鈥攜our favorite tried-and-true trainers. Nothing different. Nothing new. Any change opens you up to the possibility of blisters, an altered stride that causes you to fatigue faster, even injury. If you want to wear a specialty shoe, start using it far enough in advance that you鈥檝e adapted to it by race day. Gradually add miles over eight to twelve weeks, building up to several solid marathon-pace runs and at least one long run.

Marathon success depends far more on factors like how well you trained, how well you hydrate and fuel, and how the weather gods treat you than on which shoes you wear. In the end, the best shoes are the ones that get out of the way and quietly let your fitness shine.

Have a question of your own? Send it to us at deargear@outsideinc.com.

The post Do You Actually Need Super Shoes to Run Your Best? appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

Stepping into the Nike Vomero 17 is like pulling on your old college sweatshirt and a pair of pajama pants. They鈥檙e insanely comfortable and make you wonder why you鈥檇 ever want to wear anything else. Thankfully, they perform a lot better on the run than your old cotton digs, and testers raved about their ride on long runs and shorter speed efforts alike.

Nike Vomero 17

Pros and Cons:
鈯� Extremely comfortable upper
鈯� Soft, smooth cushioning
鈯� Versatile
鈯� Super slippery laces that come untied

Weight: 10.6 ounces (men鈥檚), 8.5 ounces (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 39.5鈥�30尘尘
Drop: 9.5mm
Sizing: 6-15, regular and extra wide (men鈥檚); 5-12, regular and extra wide (women鈥檚)

When you buy through our links, we may earn an affiliate commission. This supports our mission to get more people active and outside. Learn more.

The light and propulsive Pebax foam that carried Eulid Kipchoge to his 1:59:40 marathon is the same material you鈥檒l find underfoot in the Nike Vomero 17. The ZoomX layer sits on top of a firmer, compression-molded, EVA-based Cushlon foam. This combination feels like a ridiculously soft pillow for the first few steps鈥攅specially with the absence of the ZoomAir unit that was in the forefoot of the Vomero 16. However, we found that once we settled into our strides, the latest Vomero felt increasingly responsive, and we just wanted to keep running.

鈥淭he cushioning felt just right, lending itself to a springy ride,鈥� says Boulder, Colorado tester Kiki Silver. Katie Bleichman of Louisville, Colorado, gushed, 鈥淭hey are springy without being overly bouncy, supportive without being clunky and heavy, and speed-inspiring.鈥�

The versatile platform dampens impact when going long and provides pep when picking up the pace. 鈥淚t鈥檚 livelier than most,鈥� says an impressed tester. 鈥淣ow that I鈥檝e tried this shoe, I wonder if maybe I鈥檝e been running in shoes that are too cushioned. Maybe those sink-in cushioning shoes that don鈥檛 offer as much responsiveness are the real reason why I鈥檝e been getting slower.鈥� She may be onto something.

While many highly cushioned shoes sacrifice flexibility鈥攊t鈥檚 difficult to bend massive amounts of foam鈥攖he Vomero 17 remains flexible thanks to a 9.5-millimeter drop to a thinner forefoot, the malleable ZoomX foam, and the absence of a plate. That flexibility not only makes the shoe feel fast, it also affords a natural-feeling stride. Testers found their toes and arches engaging, particularly during uptempo training鈥攚hich makes the Vomero a healthy balance for alternating with a plated trainer or racer. The sporty overall design of the Vomero also made us feel downright nimble.

The fit of the slightly stretchy, engineered mesh upper worked for a range of foot types, from the super narrow to the wide. A secure heel cup, bolstered by molded sidewalls, gives way to a roomier toe box, allowing wriggle room without sloshing about. A nicely padded heel collar and gusseted tongue, plus a soft, gently supportive insole adds to the plush step-in feel.

鈥淚 loved everything about these shoes,鈥� said one tester. 鈥淭he sleek look, the cushioning, the lightweight nature of the shoe鈥� everything except the laces.鈥� About that last point, we agree. We have to point out that the laces are slick and come untied, even occasionally when double-knotted. Consider swapping them out for less slippery ones.

Though not toothy like a trail shoe, the high-abrasion rubber outsole with small, waffle-patterned lugs, gave us great traction, even on dirt paths. On roads, smooth dirt, and gravelly paths, we felt like we could push off easily when increasing turnover, and were able to corner like Lightning McQueen.

We think the Vomero 17 is a fantastic daily trainer, one that can both ease the miles on long runs and turn over quickly and lively on shorter efforts, making running in it fun鈥攁nd isn鈥檛 that the point?

The post Review: Nike鈥檚 Vomero 17 Running Shoes Make Our Feet Happy appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

The search for your next pair of road running shoes ends here. Whether you鈥檙e building miles or chasing more movement in your daily life, underfoot comfort and spring are essential. And with its optimal balance of impact absorption and energy return, the might be as close as you can get to running on a cloud. The smart science-backed improvements to the beloved NovaBlast set this iteration apart from anything you鈥檝e experienced before. Here鈥檚 how it works.听

Energized Cushion

That springy underfoot feel in every stride isn鈥檛 a happy accident. When rethinking the NovaBlast, ASICS worked diligently to integrate next-level energized cushion into every facet of its design. From a midsole equipped with the lightweight cushioning of FF Blast+ Eco for softer landings to the trampoline-like outsole with geometric shaping for improved bounce and acceleration where you need it most, this shoe ensures you reach your full running potential. You鈥檒l also notice that the NovaBlast 4 has a new asymmetrically engineered outsole and midsole to improve toe spring. This reimagined shape allows you to focus on your heels and the balls of your feet to achieve a continuous energy return.

Beyond its ability to deliver cloudlike cushion, FF Blast+ Eco is derived from sustainably sourced materials. This ultraenergetic foam is made with 20 percent recycled bio-based content, which helps lower the shoe鈥檚 overall 23 percent below the industry average.

Comfort and Durability

Improving sustainability in the running industry doesn鈥檛 stop at the material input. For ASICS, it also includes the development of durable, long-lasting footwear. The result of choosing quality-made running shoes like the NovaBlast 4? Less unnecessary waste鈥攁nd more miles per pair. Strategically employing Ahar Lo, an abrasion-resistant rubber, in key areas of the outsole improves durability in the NovaBlast 4 where other shoes show their first signs of wear and tear.听

Without comfort, the rest doesn鈥檛 matter. That鈥檚 why ASICS equipped this iteration of the NovaBlast with a newly engineered woven upper that has a stretchy yet supportive construction designed to flex with your movements. In addition to the lightweight breathability every runner wants in a shoe upper, the NovaBlast 4 takes every opportunity to enhance comfort, down to the perforated detail and winged construction of the tongue.

Whatever your running goals鈥攆aster, farther, or just more comfortable鈥攖he new NovaBlast 4 will help you achieve them.

Anima sana on corpore sano, meaning 鈥渁 sound mind in a sound body,鈥� is an old Latin phrase from which is derived and the fundamental platform on which the brand still stands. The company was founded more than 70 years ago by Kihachiro Onitsuka and is now a leading designer and manufacturer of performance athletic footwear, apparel, and accessories.

The post First Look: ASICS NovaBlast 4 appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.