国产吃瓜黑料

GET MORE WITH OUTSIDE+

Enjoy 35% off GOES, your essential outdoor guide

UPGRADE TODAY

Image
(Illustration: Mark Todd)
Image
Eight fan favorites. Three head-to-head rounds. Only one winner. (Illustration: Mark Todd)

Published: 
Sandal Battle

Sandal Battle, Round Two: Vote for the Final Four

Chaco and Teva storm into the second round, while an upset shocks the Crocs camp

New perk: Easily find new routes and hidden gems, upcoming running events, and more near you. Your weekly Local Running Newsletter has everything you need to lace up! .

This article is part of 国产吃瓜黑料鈥檚 Sandal Battle. View the full field of contestants here.

Welcome back to the Sandal Battle, 国产吃瓜黑料鈥檚 March Madness鈥搒tyle tournament that will crown the ultimate outdoor sandal. We鈥檝e finished one round of this three-round contest. With half the field eliminated, we head into the Final Four. Our sandal-obsessed editors have weighed in on the Elite Eight action, below, plus we鈥檝e previewed the penultimate showdown. Voting is open!

The Bracket

The Elite Eight: Results

(1) Chaco Versus (8) Adidas

Winner: Chaco

(Illustrations: Mark Todd)

When I asked a few editors to break down the first-round action, articles editor Frederick Dreier hit me back with a spot-on analysis. I鈥檒l just leave this here:

鈥淭hrow in the towel, folks, because this sandal battle ended just a few seconds into round one, with Chaco quickly handing a knockout to Adidas,鈥 he writes. 鈥淲hat鈥檚 the proper sports metaphor for this utterly lopsided contest? Hmm. Think: the U.S. women鈥檚 World Cup soccer team versus your local middle school squad, or Usain Bolt versus an actual tortoise. I chalk Chaco鈥檚 85.5 percent approval rate up to its comfortable soles and bombproof construction. As for Adidas鈥檚 lackluster performance, I can vouch for how easy it is to slip into a pair of the brand鈥檚 famed slides, but I鈥檇 never go anywhere near a trail while wearing them.鈥

(2) Teva Versus (7) Rainbow

Winner: Teva

(Illustrations: Mark Todd)

Second-seeded Teva cruised into the next round with a decisive victory over Rainbow. Teva鈥檚 wide-ranging fan base came through with a healthy 68.7 percent of the vote, while supporters of the casual flip-flop put up a decent fight with 31.3 percent (maybe they were聽too lax). In the end, features editor Matt Skenazy thinks there was some foul play. 鈥淐learly this was a rigged sandal election, and I will be holding a rally in front of the REI to #stopthesandalsteal,鈥 he writes.

(3) Keen Versus (6) Bedrock

Winner: Keen

(Illustrations: Mark Todd)

When I wrote that I was most excited for this first-round matchup in particular, I did not expect it to be this close.

In just a few hours, Bedrock jumped ahead with a narrow lead and maintained it for a few days. Then Keen surged and held on to the lead with a tight grasp鈥攋ust as grippy as the traction of its lugged sole. A few 翱耻迟蝉颈诲别听staffer Bedrock stans were heartbroken when I shared the results. 鈥淭his is terrible news,鈥 one colleague wrote me. 鈥淣o way,鈥 another exclaimed in disbelief. 鈥淎re these the final results?鈥 I could feel their pain through my screen. But this was expected. In a field of new competitors trying to find their footing, Keen鈥檚 veteran experience paid off. It is the third seed, after all.

(4) Crocs Versus (5) Birkenstock

Winner: Birkenstock

(Illustrations: Mark Todd)

 

Upset alert! The Birkenstock supporters delivered a dizzying blow to Camp Crocs, sending the rubbery clog home packing. 鈥淗ouse Stock has rightfully triumphed over the trypophobia-inducing Crocs, proving once and for all that this classic is king,鈥 writes podcast producer Maren Larsen. I incorrectly predicted that this would be a close contest. What happened to the Crocs鈥 fan base? 鈥淭hat which is misunderstood is often maligned, and there is no better proof than Crocs鈥 early loss,鈥 associate editor Daniella Byck writes. 鈥淐rocs were always going to be the underdog in the bracket, let alone this matchup. After all, Birkenstocks are textbook sandals: what you see is what you get. But Crocs dare us to imagine a world where a shoe can be so much more, thanks to adaptable straps, amphibious materials, and Jibbitz, the ultimate form of creative expression. Alas, in all their visionary boldness, Crocs were always simply too avant-garde to clinch the popular vote.鈥 Onward.

The Final Four: Voting

(1) Chaco Versus (3) Keen

(Illustrations: Mark Todd)

The Sandal Battle is probably the only time I鈥檒l be able to use this many basketball analogies without breaking some rule in 国产吃瓜黑料鈥檚 style guide,聽so I鈥檓 just going to lean into it. If we鈥檙e being consistent with my previous comparisons, Chaco versus Keen is indeed like Kentucky versus Gonzaga: two powerhouse teams, each with a long history of success and name recognition. This round has toss-up potential. You could bet the house on Chaco鈥檚 popularity alone, but how can you underestimate the sneaky, unassuming dad-sandals energy that Keen is riding from round one? Fun fact: Kentucky and Gonzaga have , way back in 2002. The Wildcats won.

(2) Teva Versus (5) Birkenstock

(Illustrations: Mark Todd)

I鈥檓 not normally known for hot takes, but I highly suspect that Birkenstock will pull off another upset this round against Teva. I think the proof is in the pudding, yes, but also in this line of podcast producer Maren Larsen鈥檚 ode to her Birks: 鈥淣ot only are they incredibly versatile, but they also have supreme staying power: the two-buckle style my mom wore in the nineties is nearly identical to the pair I wear today.鈥 According to a peer-reviewed study from the Sandal Bracketology Center for Applied Sciences, this stamina that Larsen references should translate to a deep, deep tournament run. Teva fans, prove me wrong. House Birk, vote your hearts out.

Lead Illustration: Mark Todd