国产吃瓜黑料

PRESALE IS ON!

Get 20% off Warren Miller tickets with 国产吃瓜黑料+

JOIN NOW

If you buy through our links, we may earn an affiliate commission. This supports our mission to get more people active and outside. Learn more

Don't let appearances deceive you, there's a big difference between these $50 and $700 ski jackets.
Don't let appearances deceive you, there's a big difference between these $50 and $700 ski jackets. (Photo: Sarah Jackson)
Gear Guy

Battle of the Ski Jackets: Budget vs. High End

How cheap can you go?

Published: 
Don't let appearances deceive you, there's a big difference between these $50 and $700 ski jackets.
(Photo: Sarah Jackson)

New perk: Easily find new routes and hidden gems, upcoming running events, and more near you. Your weekly Local Running Newsletter has everything you need to lace up! .

There鈥檚 no way around it: Skiing is expensive. Even if you eschew lift tickets and stick to the backcountry, you鈥檒l likely spend several thousand dollars for all your gear, and that鈥檚 before factoring in additions like avalanche safety classes. So it makes sense to cut back on costs wherever possible. For example, do you really need a super-pricey hard-shell jacket?

To answer this question, I called up my old friend Ryan Pyles to test the $600聽 head-to-head with the $50 he purchased at Walmart. Pyles, who is currently , got after it at resorts in three states over a period of several weeks for this review.

Here鈥檚 what we found.

The Jackets

Strafe Ozone Jacket ($600)

(Courtesy Strafe)

Strafe鈥檚 high-end ski jacket combines three different Polartec constructions鈥擜lpha, NeoShell, and Power Dry鈥攊n a waterproof, performance-oriented package.

Iceburg Outerwear Men鈥檚 Insulated Jacket ($50)

The Iceburg has many top-notch features, like waterproof fabric, pit zips, taped seams, and a powder skirt, but in a much more affordable package鈥攁lmost too affordable to have all that capability.

The Test

  • Pyles skied in conditions ranging from minus 10 degrees in Montana鈥檚 Bridger Bowl to a 40-degree day in Jackson, Wyoming.
  • He ran the sleeves of both jackets under a faucet for about a minute to test waterproofing. Then he filled his cupped hand with water and rubbed the liquid into the fabric to test absorption.
  • He hiked Casper Bowl in Jackson, Wyoming, in both jackets to test breathability.
  • He wore them while enjoying apr猫s PBRs and tequila shots in his van and at swanky Jackson bars to gauge looks. He also solicited opinions from friends and family.

The Results

Ski Performance and Fit

While Pyles had low standards for the Iceburg (that is, he expected to fear for his life while skiing in it during subzero temperatures), he was impressed by how well it performed. 鈥淔or $50, I expected to die of hypothermia almost immediately but was pleasantly surprised when I didn鈥檛,鈥 Pyles says. While that鈥檚 a low bar to meet, he was comfortable in the Iceburg in temps down to single digits.

Yet the Iceburg鈥檚 fit was not nearly as dialed as the Ozone鈥檚鈥攊t was much less roomy and comfortable鈥攁nd it has none of the smart detailing one gets with a high-end shell. 鈥淭he pockets weren鈥檛 big enough, there鈥檚 no internal goggle pocket, the hood is not helmet-compatible, there is no powder skirt, and the collar isn鈥檛 high enough to come up over your face,鈥 Pyles says. 鈥淏ut the absolute bare bones鈥攍ike being warm and having a hood鈥攚ere there.鈥

That said, the Ozone was the clear performance winner for how it moved with Pyles while he was skiing and its ample storage space, but also for how seamlessly the tech features are integrated into the jacket. 鈥淚 love this thing so much I am going to have to start buying $600 jackets,鈥 Pyles says. 鈥淭he jacket is also extremely well built, with care put into zipper and pocket locations to keep everything extremely functional. It鈥檚 worth the $600 you paid for it.鈥 While it was incredibly feature rich, the Ozone鈥檚 perks were built so subtly into the jacket that Pyles didn鈥檛 really think about them until they came in handy. 鈥淭he functionality is awesome鈥攖here鈥檚 a super-high collar, and the long cut means that the powder skirt actually stays below your waist and won鈥檛 ride up to your belly button,鈥 he says. 鈥淭he pockets are huge. I keep a water bottle, a couple Buffs, a couple Clif bars, and a sandwich in there and don鈥檛 have to ski with a backpack.鈥

Waterproofing

The Iceburg boasts a 5,000-millimeter waterproof/breathability rating, which sounds fancy but basically means that it has just the tiniest bit of moisture resistance. 鈥淭his was immediately obvious when I performed the faucet test, because it did not repel water at all,鈥 Pyles says. 鈥淭hat said, the coat is extremely warm and performs fine when snow is falling. Add rain, however, and you have a problem.鈥

The Ozone absolutely excelled in the faucet test and in the real world. 鈥淚t is money in terms of waterproofing,鈥 Pyles says. 鈥淚t beads up water really well, and the Polartec Neoshell doesn鈥檛 absorb water. I haven鈥檛 seen any signs of it soaking through.鈥

Breathability

鈥淲here the Iceburg really falls apart is with spikes in temperature or increased activity,鈥 Pyles says. He likened hiking Casper Bowl in this jacket to mountaineering in a plastic bag. 鈥淚t has the unpleasant tendency to not only trap moisture, but also keep it close and stick to your skin. This is compounded by the lack of any vents at all.鈥

The Ozone, on the other hand, regulated Pyles鈥 body heat incredibly well. 鈥淎bove zero degrees I wore a T-shirt, and below zero I wore the thinnest base layer I own,鈥 he says. 鈥淒espite the insulation, the jacket breathes extremely well, and I had no problem hiking Casper Bowl with the mercury around 35.鈥 And though he only had to use them once, the extra-long pit zips easily dumped excess heat. 鈥淭he fact that you aren鈥檛 wearing a ton of layers underneath means you cool down quickly,鈥 Pyles says.

Looks

Pyles was pleasantly surprised at the Walmart jacket鈥檚 steeze. It could pass for a much pricier layer. 鈥淭he Strafe jacket is slightly looser-fitting and longer, and the hidden zippers give the coat a sleeker look,鈥 he says, 鈥渂ut otherwise they both come across as nice jackets.鈥 This was confirmed during apr猫s in a Jackson Hole bar, when the Iceburg received zero ridicule. 鈥淚f style is all you are going for, apparently Walmart will pass muster for most Jackson Jerrys,鈥 Pyles says.

The Ozone held up on close inspection. Credit the long cut that lends it a little park flavor while being tailored tight enough to not fit like a XXXL basketball jersey. Also, all the details are hidden, keeping it from coming off as flashy. 鈥淚t is really clean-looking, with its solid color-blocking and simple lines,鈥 Pyles says.

The Bottom Line

As expected, there is a huge quality difference between $50 and $600 ski jackets. Does that disparity warrant the $550 price gap? Both Pyles and I think it does鈥攊f, of course, you have that kind of scratch to spend.

鈥淎ll said and done, the Iceburg is a perfectly viable cold-weather storm jacket,鈥 Pyles says. After all, if you get cold or sweat enough, you can always go warm up in a lodge鈥攁nd spend your savings on beer.

Lead Photo: Sarah Jackson

Popular on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online