Oregon鈥檚 Clackamas County听is a thickly timbered, 1,879-square-mile outdoor-recreation paradise. It鈥檚 home to 11,249-foot Mount听Hood, a sprawling river system, several wilderness areas, a national forest, and more than 61 miles of the Pacific Crest Trail. Around 10,000 people attempt to climb Mount听Hood every year, and millions more play in the woods and waterways听surrounding the peak.听
For years, the Clackamas County Sheriff鈥檚 Office (CCSO) has relied on three volunteer search and rescue teams to keep all those people safe: (PMR), (PNWSAR), and . These groups have 100 years of combined institutional history, plus nearly 400 highly trained volunteers who are on call听24/7. They are considered the best of the best by their fellow national and international search and rescue (SAR) communities, serve at no cost to taxpayers, and operate in conjunction with the sheriff鈥檚 office like听most other SAR teams around听the country. But recently, the CCSO听announced a plan to replace all of them with its own volunteer program听and informed current SAR volunteers from PMR, PNWSAR, and Mountain Wave that they would stop receiving mission callouts within 18 months. (A fourth听group, Northern Oregon Regional SAR, also operates in Clackamas County, but is considerably smaller than PMR, PNWSAR, and Mountain Wave.)
鈥淢ount Hood is the gateway to mountaineering in North America and the second most climbed mountain in the world,鈥 says local big-mountain skier Matthias Giraud. 鈥淲ith the crowds come both experts and the completely inexperienced and unprepared. It鈥檚 a fickle mountain, and without the experience and expertise of the existing teams, it would turn into a graveyard.鈥
So why the sudden change?
鈥淭he formation of a single, unified search-and-rescue program for Clackamas County comes in the wake of recent litigation, at the recommendation of Clackamas County counsel, and following a comprehensive study that鈥檚 now available for听,鈥 read a February 19 from the office of Sheriff Craig Roberts.听
The litigation referenced听is a lawsuit filed in 2018 by the family of听John Jenkins, who died after a 600-foot fall on Mount听Hood in 2017. A PMR ground team reached Jenkins within minutes of the accident, but he succumbed to his injuries as a rescue helicopter brought him on board.听
Jenkins鈥檚 family sought $10 million in damages听and faulted the CCSO听and Clackamas County 911 for communication errors that they said contributed to a more than four-hour delay in the deployment of the rescue helicopter. (The sheriff and the county have disputed the family鈥檚 version of events.)听The case was settled out of court for $25,000. The settlement also required that Clackamas County pay an additional $5,000 to PMR in honor of John Jenkins.听
鈥淭he lawsuit was never about the money,鈥 says Robert Jenkins, John鈥檚 father. 鈥淲e didn鈥檛 want this to happen to someone else. The fault was not in search and rescue.听The fault was in the sheriff鈥檚 office and their internal protocol for handling 911 calls.鈥 Robert Jenkins donated the money from the settlement to SAR groups in the Pacific Northwest.听The settlement also stipulated that the CCSO upgrade its training for internal emergency personnel, such as the staff who answer 911 calls.
Since the settlement rewarded PMR for its听efforts, Sheriff Roberts鈥檚 decision to disband the current SAR structure didn鈥檛 seem to add up. 鈥淵ou have to wonder if there鈥檚 vindication听at听play,鈥 says Allan Brettman, who covered for The听Oregonian.听
Further, the 鈥渃omprehensive study鈥 the sheriff鈥檚 office relied on to make its decision was in no way comprehensive. It focused on only two of the 36 counties in Oregon鈥擠eschutes and Multnomah鈥攁nd a program in Mono Lake, California, and, according to many search and rescue experts,听failed to analyze how SAR programs in those places actually work. There鈥檚 also no sign that the study鈥檚 author,听a retired Clackamas County undersheriff, consulted with local experts who know the county鈥檚 terrain, environment, and needs.听
鈥淧MR is one of the top technical rescue teams in the country,鈥 says Art Fortini, president of the . 鈥淟osing such a resource would be a major loss to the mountain rescue community. If you are going to replace them with a new team that is less experienced, I expect it to have a negative impact on patient outcomes. And how that is supposed to reduce lawsuits is a mystery to me.鈥
Public outcry against the CCSO鈥檚 decision to dismantle its traditional volunteer teams was swift and widespread. In SAR corners of the internet, #savePMR听started trending. The听Oregonian ran an 听arguing that 鈥渨hile Roberts has the power to make such a dramatic change, he has yet to articulate a rational argument for it,鈥 and that 鈥渉is proposal to replace the existing arrangement with his own search-and-rescue team 鈥 seems more about enforcing administrative directives than promoting safety.鈥
Then, on February 25, a Hood River man named Cory Johnston died after a fall on Mount听Hood. The volunteer team from PMR听had once again been able to reach the victim within minutes of the accident. A day after the tragedy, Sheriff Rogers met with members of PMR鈥攁 meeting that the search and rescue outfit听had been trying to schedule for months.听
A joint statement ensued from the sheriff鈥檚 office and PMR, relaying that 鈥渁fter a productive discussion this morning, we鈥檙e excited to announce a mutual agreement in principle on general terms for a closer relationship between Portland Mountain Rescue and the Clackamas County Sheriff鈥檚 Office. We all believe this arrangement will improve safety on the mountain.鈥澨
There is little doubt that public uproar over the issue, combined with the timing of Johnston鈥檚 death, caused Sheriff Roberts to rethink his position, at least with PMR. The other groups still hope that he will reconsider bringing all SAR operations in-house. Diana Worthen, president of PNWSAR, said that representatives from her organization met with the sheriff in early March. 鈥淭he discussion is far from over, and a resolution still feels very far off, despite the press release about the 鈥榤utual agreement in principle鈥櫶齱ith PMR,鈥 says Worthen. 鈥淭hey have no actual agreement, just a goodwill handshake so far, and they鈥檝e unfortunately excluded PNWSAR and the other teams from discussions. But I am very pleased to see CCSO鈥檚 leadership showing an interest in discussing solutions, and I am hopeful for a positive outcome for SAR in Clackamas County.鈥澨
A spokesperson for the sheriff鈥檚 office said that the public outrage had been a result of a 鈥渕isunderstanding鈥 by the media. The spokesperson declined to comment further,听but听Sheriff Roberts released a statement听in early April that听reads,听鈥淲e鈥檙e still working with our search volunteers听and will in the immediate future through this transition. We of course understand the concerns of the volunteer teams. Their invaluable contributions have saved countless lives on the mountain and in other SAR scenarios. We also want those existing volunteers to join the unified team. This change is not designed to push SAR volunteers away鈥攊t鈥檚 designed to bring them into a closer working relationship with us, with uniform standards.鈥
While the future of听the independent SAR programs remains uncertain, an election in November may hold the definitive answer. Recently retired CCSO Sergeant Lynn Schoenfeld听is running for Sheriff Roberts鈥檚 post and publicly spoke out against the initial plan to disband the SAR structure. 鈥淚ssues such as public safety, the safety of volunteer searchers, as well as any cost associated with these changes were not examined. If these changes continue, I believe lives will be placed at risk,鈥 says Schoenfeld. Sheriff Roberts has since announced that he will听not be running for reelection.听However, one of the architects of the new in-house SAR program, Lieutenant听Brian Jensen, is also running for the position.
鈥淲e are still not getting called out like we used to,鈥 says Russ Gubele, president of Mountain Wave. 鈥淲e are hoping that with a new sheriff, we will be able to keep the independent teams. A lot depends on who wins the election.鈥