国产吃瓜黑料

GET MORE WITH OUTSIDE+

Enjoy 35% off GOES, your essential outdoor guide

UPGRADE TODAY

If you buy through our links, we may earn an affiliate commission. This supports our mission to get more people active and outside. Learn more

Image
(illustration: Jason Holley)
Image
(illustration: Jason Holley)

Published: 

Whose Woods These Are

If you鈥檙e lucky, you encountered nature for the first time by running out the back door. During our writer's boyhood, a suburban forest was a gateway to learning, exploration, and natural splendors that shaped his life and career.

New perk: Easily find new routes and hidden gems, upcoming running events, and more near you. Your weekly Local Running Newsletter has everything you need to lace up! .

When you're a kid, the world seems big and ordained. Things are as they are because they are. Even your neighborhood seems big and ordained, until you outgrow it, depart, and consider it again from a distance. Then you might start to see its deeper dimensions鈥攊ts 颅layers of time, contingency, and meaning. You might notice聽how geography and history, as well as sheer chance, played a role in making the place what it was. You might discover the turbulent boundary between nostalgia and revelation. That鈥檚 the boundary I discovered, almost 60 years after the fact, when I looked at my childhood through .

There was a house on a street in suburban Cincinnati. The street, barely more than a mile long, was called Belmont Avenue. Belmont: beautiful mountain, though this mountain was tiny. The neighborhood, for reasons I never thought to examine, was known as College Hill. The house sat at 6071. It was a ranch house with two stories and dormers, built in 1950, on a remnant half acre of farmland, by a young couple named Will and Mary Quammen, my parents. 颅Before that they had lived in an old redbrick farmhouse, first erected in the 1830s, 颅later expanded, still later divided into apartments, just a few hundred yards down the hill. That farmhouse, which we knew as the Runck place鈥攁fter Reno Runck, the resident patriarch and landlord鈥攚as where I spent my first two years of life. An ancient well stood in front, beneath its little wooden well house, and a gazebo, and an old concrete swimming pool, full of green water, into which I could have toddled had my mother not harnessed me to a dog run wire. Moving up Belmont to our new house, this one owned and not rented, was our leap into the postwar middle class.聽

(Mike Reagan)

Behind the house, stretching to the south, lay a weedy zone of thistle scrub and tall grasses, and beyond that a forest. A trail led through the weeds to the trees, then deep into them, and that trail was kept open in large part by my feet. I had a best friend named Eddie who shared my fascination with insects, reptiles, nature in all forms, and what seemed at the time to be wild landscape. In this part of College Hill, Eddie and I were Lewis and Clark.

The forest had no name. We called it simply the Woods. Within it grew oaks and maples and sycamores and catalpas and black walnut trees, some of them draped with grapevines as thick as nautical rope, flaky with cinnamon-colored bark. If you chose the right vine and hacked through its base with your sheath knife, you could swing on it over a ravine, Tarzan style. You would do that with reckless persistence until it broke and you dropped. The black walnuts and maples, with their open limb structures,聽invited climbing. Sycamores, in my recollection, were as brittle as pretzels. A big limb could snap and you plummeted. But you were 11 years old, elastic, and immortal.


Downslope through the Woods flowed a small stream, also nameless, across ledges and plates of broken limestone. We called it the Creek. Under those flat rocks, some of them cobbled with shell fossils, Eddie and I found salamanders and crawdads. (My method of catching crawdads was artless but effective: stick a finger down the hole and wait for a pincer to clamp it, then pull the little monster out.) In the leaf litter, on a good day, we might encounter a box turtle or a garter snake or a shrew. Tiger swallowtails flitted on their yellow and black wings through the sunny gaps. Cecropia moths, velvety umber and huge, were subtler and more nocturnal. Eddie was a year older and a better lepidopterist than I; he possessed, expertly spread and mounted in frames, a zebra swallowtail (rarer than the tiger), a luna moth, and a polyphemus, named for聽the Homeric Cyclops because of its big glaring eyespot on each lower wing. Magnificent creatures, all of them, even when dead.

I envied Eddie鈥檚 trophies, fraternally and respectfully, like a deer hunter envies a man with a roan antelope head on his rec-room wall. I was advantaged, though, by parents who saw no reason why a boy shouldn鈥檛 keep snakes and salamanders and the 颅occasional bat caged as 鈥減ets鈥 in his room. My two sisters had their own interests, and I, the middle child, was indulged to run a menagerie. But the real point of going to the Woods was not bringing zoological hostages home. The point was to wander loose in a universe of birdsong and spiderwebs and greenery. This was the place to which, for a handful of years in the mid-1950s, I gave my time and my heart. Then the bulldozers came.

David (left) and Eddie.
David (left) and Eddie. (Courtesy of the Quammen Family)

Nameless or not, the Woods turned out to have owners, though we had never heard of them nor seen a NO TRESPASSING sign. And those owners, a partnership of home-颅building brothers, had decided to develop a large hunk of it. They started just beyond my family鈥檚 back fence. The thistle scrub went. Then the trees and vines and cool woodland shade disappeared, scraped away, all as I watched. The bare dirt may have smelled like progress or profit to the brothers, but not to me. A grid of streets was laid down, by trucks full of concrete and the men who finished it. One time two vandals鈥攗m, OK, a friend and I鈥攑ulled up survey stakes and moved them, a resentful prank that accomplished nothing except to insert a peculiar bend between one end of Blue Bell Drive and another. Then came house foundations, and houses atop them. In a blink a new suburb of neat, boring ranch homes sprouted鈥攈ouses that were not so unlike ours, except for being appallingly 颅regimented鈥攊ntruding between me and whatever remained of the Woods. It was a formative experience.聽

In the six decades following, given trends of urban growth in America, pressures of population worldwide, and the relentless human thirst to convert landscape for our own conveniences, I came to assume that the loss of that forest would be total. If it聽was half gone by 1959, what hope could there be for the rest?

My family left Cincinnati in 1966. Strangers bought our home on Belmont, and somehow, in the late 1990s or thereabouts, its owners managed to burn it down. If you want to experience a sense of severance from childhood鈥檚 golden glow, I recommend this: let someone torch your very house, shovel its ruins away, replace it with another. That鈥檒l chill your nostalgia.

The point of the Woods was to wander loose in a universe of birdsong and spiderwebs and greenery. This was the place to which, for a handful of years in the mid-1950s, I gave my time and my heart.

Then one day, several years ago, I happened to revisit the old neighborhood in virtual space. I typed our address into Google Maps and scanned the area as seen from a thousand feet up. The street contours were familiar, even that blip in Blue Bell Drive, and I recognized all the names, except one.聽

Inside an empty zone, south of Belmont,聽between the loathed suburb and the next road a mile farther below, I saw the words 鈥淔ox Preserve.鈥 Fox what? Never heard of it. Since when did Cincinnati care about foxes? But wait, no鈥擨 rechecked the location, south of Belmont and north of a road called Kirby Avenue, descending from College Hill to the lowlands, and realized: this must be what鈥檚 left of the Woods. That poignant surprise put me to wondering whether the whole story wasn鈥檛 so simple.


I've spent much of my adult life as a writer who walks through jeopardized forests. I鈥檝e slogged for weeks across the Congo Basin. I鈥檝e bashed through the Amazon on foot. I鈥檝e climbed the slippery green hillsides of Madagascar and pushed my way through the thickets of northwestern Tasmania. I鈥檝e walked the cliff lines and savanna forest of Komodo, an island in Indonesia, where if you鈥檙e not careful a 200-pound lizard will jump out of the brush and bite you on the ass. These have been privileged opportunities; I鈥檝e been lucky and blessed. It鈥檚 a job, it鈥檚 a vocation, it鈥檚 a literary beat鈥攆ollowing field biologists through forests. And none of it would have happened, probably, if not for the hikes through my first forest, the one in College Hill.

My circuit from there to the others of my adulthood was roundabout and haphazard. By chance as well as by choice, I never became a herpetologist, as I once thought I might. My path was influenced by great teachers, three in particular, each of whom touched the ship鈥檚 wheel of my life, 颅delicately but astutely, lovingly, turning the rudder just a few degrees, and helped set my course into literary efforts, not science. The first two were Jesuit English teachers at a private high school in Cincinnati. The third was , novelist and poet and critic, one of America鈥檚 great men of letters, who became my mentor and friend while I was a student at Yale. Warren helped find a publisher for my first book, a novel. He also wrote me a ticket, by way of a Rhodes scholarship recommendation, for two years at Oxford. If these three men had been biologists, not literati, my life would be different.

The other person whose guiding touch mattered was my Norwegian American father. (But of course it wasn鈥檛 just males: my mother was Irish and caustic and funny, and I flatter myself that her genes nurture my sense of the absurd.) What my father did was keep open the path that led into forests, along rivers, up mountains, toward the cold white places and the deep green places distant from libraries. First he taught me to fish. He started me cross-country skiing at a time, around 1959, when the phrase cross-country skiing didn鈥檛 even compute, certainly not in Ohio. Then in 1962, the summer after I turned 14, he took me into Quetico Provincial Park, in western Ontario, where we traveled by canoe for a week and lived off smallmouth bass. Two months after that, as a clueless high school freshman, pubescent and confused in a new school among strangers, I met the first of the life-changing Jesuits.聽

A young David Quammen fishing in Yosemite.
A young David Quammen fishing in Yosemite. (Courtesy of the Quammen Family)

This dazzling young seminarian, Jerry Lackamp, forced us to write, every week鈥攚hich for me was like forcing Brer Rabbit into the briars. In biology class, I dissected a fetal pig. In English, I dis颅sected stories and sentences, and began seeing how they were put together. In terms of engaging my interest, there was no contest between these two disciplines. So my path for the next decade led through classrooms and literature鈥攎ost valuably, the novels of William Faulkner, which engrossed me for years鈥攁nd not through labs or forests. But that path would eventually bend back around, like an elliptical orbit shaped by gravity as well as momentum, to wild places and wild creatures.

Having got a bellyful of ivy at Yale and Oxford, I moved to Montana in 1973. I rediscovered my yen for fishing and cross-颅country skiing and biology. I paid dues, working 颅menial jobs. Bartender. Waiter. Fishing guide. I established by empirical test (several long manuscripts and many 颅rejections) that the world didn鈥檛 need me to be a novelist. And then, by luck and wide reading, I stumbled upon a glorious epiphany: nonfiction, too, could be artful. . . . . If you were stubborn and had some skill, it could earn you a living. I became a magazine writer and then an author of nonfiction books. Once you get this license in your wallet, you can take聽it almost anywhere, including back to your old neighborhood with new eyes.


My re-exploration of the place was, at first, distant and idle鈥攁 couple of books, a little online noodling. College Hill, I discovered belatedly, is a distinguished locale in the history of racial struggle in America. A bit of digging revealed that this modest green highland鈥攁bove the downtown business district of a complacent, conservative midwestern city鈥攈ad played a crucial role in the saga of the Underground Railroad.

In 1799, a circuit-riding Methodist preacher named Danforth Witherby bought 100 acres of farmland and dug a well in the area, along a path that would eventually become Belmont Avenue. (The Witherby homestead, more than a century later, was the Runck place.) Around the same time, U.S. forces under General 鈥淢ad 颅Anthony鈥 Wayne cut a dirt road up a ravine to the hilltop, opening their way to prosecute battles against a confederacy of Shawnee and 颅Miami Indians. The ravine road would become Hamilton Avenue, connecting hilltop to lowlands, as Cincinnati grew quickly into a busy, dirty entrep么t on the Ohio River. By 1820, a village had been platted on the hilltop and named Pleasant Hill, because the air was cool and the green rolling highland more agreeable than the hog-slaughter pens and riverboat docks downtown. The founding families of Pleasant Hill included some affluent Quakers and radical Presbyterians, abolitionist by conviction and serious enough to take action and assume risk. A modest number of free blacks also settled聽in the area, some of them inhabiting small cabins in 鈥渟equestered places鈥濃攁 phrase from the sketchy historical sources, which I take to mean woodlands away from the roads. These groups helped escaped slaves travel north to freedom and safety, even after the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 made that a severely punishable crime.

Eventually, the hilltop got a new name. One son of a wealthy farming family went off to Miami University, in a nearby Ohio town, and returned with a zeal for learning. He founded a boys鈥 academy in Pleasant Hill that developed into an institution called Farmers鈥 College. Its mission wasn鈥檛 just to teach farming but to educate the sons of farmers for leading positions 鈥渋n any of the industrial pursuits.鈥 Benjamin Harrison, later the 23rd president of the United States, studied there in the late 1840s, and the school attracted students from all over the region. Growing large and successful, Farmers鈥 College moved to a new building on what became Belmont Avenue. A separate school for women, the Ohio Female College, began operating not far away. Such educational opportunities were preciously rare at the time, west of the Alleghenies, in what was still considered the wild 鈥渘orthwest鈥 of America. So when the village of Pleasant Hill incorporated in 1866, its proud residents renamed it College Hill.聽

Meanwhile, from the 1830s into the 1850s, Cincinnati quietly emerged as a major 颅nexus for fugitive slaves crossing the river from Kentucky, from slave state to free. It鈥檚 important to remember that a Free State like Ohio didn鈥檛 represent safety and security for escapees from slavery. The Ohio River marked the northern boundary of legalized slavery, yes, as an extension westward of the Mason-Dixon Line, but the Fugitive Slave Act applied throughout the north, mandating the forcible return of any escapee captured there. So the movement of fugitives up through Ohio, to Lake Erie or 颅Detroit, then across to Canada, all had to happen 颅secretly鈥攁nd Cincinnati was a tunnel through which much of that traffic passed.

A man named Levi Coffin, a Quaker businessman and a leader in Underground Railroad activism, moved to the city in 1847, ostensibly to run a warehouse selling free-labor goods, such as cotton grown in Mississippi by paid freedmen workers, not slaves. Less overtly, Coffin continued his efforts to help runaway slaves escape north. He lived in a different part of town, harboring hundreds of fugitives at his own house as they moved north, and he colluded carefully with the abolitionists of College Hill.

鈥淲e breathe a little better here,鈥 she told us. 鈥淲e experience life differently because of the healing quality of these woods.鈥

Two factors gave College Hill its tactical importance: all those Quakers and radical Presbyterians, and the fact that it was on the safest route to Detroit. The route followed Hamilton Avenue, a well-traveled pike that had a deep wooded ravine on the east side, offering cover, and then one of its branches took the gentle diagonal of Belmont Avenue, angling toward byways beyond. One family along Hamilton, the abolitionist household of Zebulon Strong, provided stopover support. When a group of fugitives came up the gully, Strong鈥檚 children would play back there, leaving food; after dark, Strong would hide the escapees in his wagon, beneath a false bottom, and drive them along Belmont to another safe house. If you type 鈥淏elmont Avenue, Cincin颅nati鈥 into Google Maps today, then zoom out, you鈥檒l find this little street ambling northwest to connect with U.S. Route 27, which leads straight up to Fort Wayne, Indiana. Next stops from there: Toledo, Detroit, and Ontario. Canada meant true freedom.

In other words, though I had no inkling of it when my family lived on Belmont, nor did my parents or sisters, nor anyone I knew, the Underground Railroad had run right past our front door. Retroactively, it gave me, as you can imagine, a jolt of awe and entirely unearned pride.


Curious about聽Fox Preserve, I flew back to Cincinnati recently for a little shoe-颅leather reconnaissance. First I met with a man named Larry Parker, west region manager for the . From him I got a good map and advice on how to read it. Parker also gave me documents showing that Fox Preserve consisted of just 14.3 acres of forest, donated to the city in 1980 by Edward and Patricia Fox, residents of 5807 McCray Ct. in College Hill, who were giving away their extended, unusable backyard. McCray Court, I saw from the map, was one of the deepest penetrations of that hated 1950s subdivision into the Woods. Fox Preserve was protected as green颅 space by the city but not developed to invite visitation鈥攏o sign, no trailhead, no 颅benches, though it was public. Yes, I could access it. To get in, Parker said, I should just drive to McCray Court and walk between two houses.

It seemed intrusive. This was not far from where my friend and I had moved the survey stakes almost 60 years earlier. So I felt a little vestigial guilt (though no regret) when I went in. As I emerged from my short walk, gaping around for landmarks, a sandy-haired woman appeared from one of the houses and called, 鈥淢ay I help you?鈥 Now I鈥檓 in trouble, I thought. But when I explained my mission, she responded brightly. Her name was Peggy St. Clair, a journalist herself, formerly gardening columnist for the Cincinnati Enquirer, and she had written an article about Fox Preserve. Her parents had lived here for decades, next door to Mr. and Mrs. Fox, in the house she now occupied with her husband. St. Clair had loved walking the preserve with her children. It was full of deer, she told me, and harbored coyotes, too. Neither animal was present when Eddie and I patrolled this forest鈥攖he deer population must have rebounded from earlier eras of unregulated hunting, and the coyotes were invaders, having expanded their range east of the Mississippi, filling niches left vacant by wolves. St. Clair was attuned to another invasive species: Asian bush honeysuckle,聽an ornamental plant that had gone 颅feral, choking the forest understory in some 颅places. She invited me to return, tramp through her side yard, and explore as I wished. I told her I might bring a friend.

The friend was Thane Maynard, director of the , and famous to NPR listeners as the . Before he became a zoo professional and a conservationist, Thane was a nature kid growing up in the woods of central Florida, and I guessed correctly that this mock-epic expedition might amuse him. Early the next morning, we turned up on Peggy St. Clair鈥檚 doorstep for a courtesy visit and a bit more information about the green highlands of College Hill. 鈥淲e breathe a little better here,鈥 she told us. 鈥淲e experience life differently because of the healing quality of these woods.鈥 Thane and I plunged off her backyard and into the forest, fighting our way downslope through a thicket of honeysuckle. After 15 minutes the stuff thinned, and beneath a cooling canopy of hardwoods, we came to a rocky streambed. 鈥淵ou found your creek,鈥 he said. 鈥淚t even has a trickle.鈥 Not much, but a start.

Part of Thane鈥檚 job on this mission was to identify birds by their songs, a skill I never mastered. (I was a reptiles and insects guy.) Red-shouldered hawk, he reported now, probably a young one, from the sound of that squeak. He listened more: Blue jays, of course. Carolina wrens. And there鈥檚 the train whistle of a nuthatch. We both聽noticed that, although the forest looked verdant and natural, most of the big trees were standing dead, and almost all the live trees were youngish, less than about 50 years old. (Sprouted from seeds since my last visit鈥攖ake a guess whether that didn鈥檛 make me feel like a codger.) In the mud of the creek bottom, there was a single deer track. Around it lay flat shards of limestone embedded with clam shells and other fossils. 鈥淥rdovician,鈥 Thane said. 鈥淲e鈥檙e the epicenter of trilobites.鈥 Good: at least the rocks were older than me.

We walked the creek bottom and, as it gathered more water, hopscotched our way on the dry stones. I turned over a few, looking for crawdads and salamanders. No luck. Just one small fish and a few worms. I didn鈥檛 bring a water-quality test kit and could only wonder how much unsavory effluent might flow down this ravine from the suburbs above. If the deer had returned and the trees were still growing, but the amphibians and crustaceans had been poisoned out, was this still the Woods of my youth? I knew of Heraclitus and his dictum about time and rivers, but was it true also that you can鈥檛 step in the same forest twice?

After 45 minutes, Thane and I came to a stonework culvert, where the creek poured under a road. This was Kirby Avenue, traversing down from College Hill to the lowlands. It marked the end of the first leg of a walk through the Woods but not the final end, because you could climb over it and drop back into the creek. What I hadn鈥檛 known in the 1950s was the role Kirby Avenue had played in the annals of American heroism.聽


In April 1853, some 28 fugitive slaves came out of Kentucky together, crossed the 颅river by night in skiffs that nearly sank from overloading, and made their way after dawn into Cincinnati. From a few tireless local 颅researchers, whom I reached through the College Hill Historical Society, and an 1876 book titled , I learned about this signal episode, known as the Escape of the 28.聽

The escapees were helped by a friendly white man, who accompanied them from Kentucky, and a black deacon at Cincin颅nati鈥檚 Zion Baptist Church. From the deacon鈥檚 house, they sent a message to Levi Coffin, that daring Quaker, who came and plotted the next moves. Hamilton Avenue was considered too dangerous at this point, notwithstanding the Zebulon Strong stopover, because of a southern sympathizer who also lived along the road. Coffin thought of a subterfuge and an alternate route. 鈥淚 suggested that someone should go immediately to a聽certain German livery stable in the city and hire two coaches,鈥 he 颅recounted later. Riding聽in the coaches, and a few buggies driven by free black men, with 颅other folks walking alongside, the group should 鈥渇orm a procession as if going to a funeral鈥 and march solemnly out a road leading toward the Methodist Episcopal cemetery, which had one section set apart for 鈥渃olored people.鈥 Instead of turning in for a burial, the cortege would go past, proceeding gently uphill to a fork in the road, where the right branch climbed steeply to College Hill by the back way. The right fork was Kirby Avenue.

Coffin鈥檚 trusted contact and collaborator was Reverend Jonathan Cable, an abo-li颅tionist Presbyterian minister who lived on the far end of Belmont, in a house just north of the Witherby farmstead. Cable made 颅arrangements to have shoes and traveling clothes ready for the fugitives when they arrived. Along the way, a sick child died and was buried quickly and quietly in College Hill; another escapee joined the group there, though, so they were again 28. During the stopover in College Hill, Reverend Cable hid some of the fugitives in his house, while others stayed with black families along Belmont or in the Woods. Reading this fact about Cable鈥檚 role, and realizing his home was only steps from the one where I lived until age two, the Witherby farmstead, a.k.a. the Runck place, I felt another of those edifying jolts: as a toddler, all unaware, I had toddled on historic ground.

From a few tireless local researchers, whom I reached through the College Hill Historical Society, and an 1876 book titled “Reminiscences of Levi Coffin,” I learned about this signal episode, known as the Escape of the 28.

鈥淲e never know what we have lost, or what we have found,鈥 Robert Penn Warren wrote in his poem cycle about John James Audubon, published in 1969 as Audubon: A Vision. 鈥淲e are only ourselves, and that promise.鈥 Audubon, an errant Frenchman, an explorer of American wilderness, and a brilliant depicter of nature as he saw it in the sublimity of birds, had always 颅fascinated Warren, who鈥檇 been a boy naturalist himself in early 20th-century Kentucky, with a passion for taxidermy and red-tailed hawks. But to Warren, the overriding fascination was story, not science, and he turned to literature. He helped turn me to literature, too, without denying the tug of the forest. The benign tension between those two realms exemplifies Warren鈥檚 conundrum: never knowing 鈥渨hat we have lost, or what we have found.鈥

It鈥檚 hard to tally the prices of choice and happenstance. Yet part of a reflective life is to try, as Warren well knew. Myself, I lost half a forest. I lost a boyhood home, site of my richest memories, to fire. I surrendered one possible life for the chance to seize another. I lost touch with a place. Then I looked again and found Fox Preserve, and the noble his颅tory of Belmont Avenue.


A few hundred yards down the creek, Thane and I came into a maple glade, fully canopied, a lovely area with almost no honey颅suckle clogging the understory. The ravine was still steep, and still wooded, though paralleled now by Kirby Avenue, not far away. 鈥淪aved by the hills,鈥 said Thane. 鈥淵ou know, if this was flat, people would have developed it.鈥 He was right. All the hillsides were slippery and unstable, with layers of clay and brittle Ordovician limestone beneath shallow soil. That explained why several other parcels of steep wooded property hereabouts had also been donated to Cincinnati by generous but realistic owners over the decades, and pieced together by the Parks Department into a sizable urban forest.聽Kirby Valley, some people called it.

Now we saw a house, just upslope on the road. We saw a white pit bull running down to investigate us. Uh-oh, we thought. But the dog turned out to be a tail-wagging sweetheart who only wanted to sniff and have her ears scratched. A man shouted down to her, and then shouted to us: Are you the guys from the city? Are you from Sewer? Thane and I were in green shirts, remotely official looking, and I had a notebook. No, I called back, we鈥檙e not from Sewer. We鈥檙e just a couple of nature nerds on a hike.

The man鈥檚 name was Chris Leonard, and he had concerns about stream-bank erosion. Two years ago, a hundred-year flood on this creek carved the bejesus out of his back lot. This spring he lost another three feet behind his driveway. Couldn鈥檛 anything be done? Just as I was starting to take Mr. Leonard for one of those control-of-nature guys, he climbed down into the creek with us and started talking about tree frogs.

He rescued them when he could. He had a little backyard swimming pool, covered seasonally so it wouldn鈥檛 fill with leaves. Last year the frogs laid eggs in the standing water on the pool cover, and as they grew鈥攁s the water evaporated and the tadpoles were in jeopardy鈥攈e transferred them into his canoe, still holding rainwater. Why? 鈥淚 wanna hear the damn tree frog noise.鈥 He had a complaint: 鈥淭his year there鈥檚 not been one damn tree frog.鈥 But, on the bright side, plenty of snakes. When he walked elsewhere in the Woods, if he saw a snake, he would catch it and release it on his own property. Kept the mice down鈥攑lus he liked them. He had an albino corn snake, a pet, in the house.

His children lived just a ways down Kirby, with his ex-wife, an amicable arrangement, and Leonard hosted occasional nature outings for them and their friends. His property went deep into the forest off Kirby Avenue, including the section of creek in which we stood and a swath beyond, where he had a campfire area. He held cookouts for the kids, taught them a little natural history, and sometimes they鈥檇 see a barred owl or a flock of wild turkeys. Once in a while, they found trilobites. Salamanders? I asked. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e here. Salamanders galore.鈥 I was relieved. Deer and coyotes? 鈥淎 shit ton,鈥 said Leonard. Also pileated woodpeckers, box turtles, scarlet tanagers.

You鈥檙e taking a lot of notes for a nature nerd on a hike, he told me. OK, full truth, I said, I鈥檓 a nature nerd on a magazine assignment. That sufficed. We introduced ourselves and shook hands, and he lit up with recognition of Thane鈥檚 name.

I asked Chris Leonard his line of work. Building communications networks, he said. Whatever that might mean, I was impressed by the communications he was building with the next generation. Seemed to me he was helping give the Woods a future as well as a past.

Thane and I climbed back up the ravine. He had a zoo to run, and I had an appointment at the archives. Following my nose, my memory, and my compass, we missed Peggy St. Clair鈥檚 backyard by only about five degrees. We emerged from the Woods through someone else鈥檚 side yard, on a different little dead-end circle just adjacent to hers. A man saw us and came to his back door. Now we鈥檙e in trouble, I thought. But when I asked forgiveness, he hollered back cheerily, saying, Sure, it鈥檚 fine to cut through. These woods belong to everybody.

Editor at Large David Quammen聽() was 国产吃瓜黑料's Natural Acts Columnist from 1981 to 1996.聽 is an 国产吃瓜黑料 contributing artist.