Ten years ago, kiteboarding pioneer Don Montague hatched a plan to become the fastest person to circumnavigate the globe. His idea was to use a 65-foot catamaran, cabled to a large parafoil, that would fly some 250 feet in the air. Essentially, he would supersize the typical kiteboard rig. A few months into the project, he gave a preview to a couple of kitesurfing friends, Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page.
鈥淚 was showing them how much power was actually available at higher altitudes, and I said, 鈥楲ook, I can even generate electricity,鈥欌夆 says Montague, who had worked with a Dutch astronaut to build a kite-power prototype. 鈥淭hey said, 鈥楧on, don鈥檛 waste your time sailing around the world. Let鈥檚 save the world.鈥欌夆
So Montague and his partners set about designing a wind turbine that would be held aloft like a kite but use small propellers to generate electricity. Montague named the new endeavor . At the outset, Google in the effort. Last May, Makani was sold outright to Google X鈥攖he R&D lab that created Google Glass鈥攆or an undisclosed amount. And this summer, backed by the company鈥檚 enormous resources, Makani began building a second-generation, 600-kilowatt wind turbine, which could one day generate enough electricity to power 300 homes鈥攁s many as the largest modern land-based turbines.
Makani鈥檚 big idea rests on a simple concept: wind gets stronger鈥攁nd more dependable鈥攖he higher you go. Dozens of companies around the world are working on design formulas based on this principle, everything from a propeller system that stays aloft with helium, like a blimp, to a large drone-like quadcopter with spinning blades that produce energy.
One of the primary hurdles in technology races like this is capital, since most investors consider the odds of failure too great. But with Google鈥檚 deep pockets, Makani is by far the most likely outfit to usher in a new era of wind power. 鈥淲e are able to go faster, and we have a larger appetite for risk,鈥 says Damon Vander Lind, lead engineer at Makani. 鈥淧erhaps we will fail. But if we succeed, the value dwarfs all the potential failures.鈥
Some alternative-power advocates are ambivalent about Google leading the way to a renewable-energy future, but the wind sector needs all the help it can get. Proponents like to boast that the resource could supply the U.S. with 20 percent of its electricity needs, yet the industry has foundered in recent years, beset by political and logistical woes. A big part of the problem is that current land-based designs are expensive to build and clunky to transport. That鈥檚 where Montague鈥檚 high-flying concept comes in.
鈥淲hile classic turbines are facing physical and economic limits, airborne wind energy shows interesting potential,鈥 says Roland Schmehl, a professor at the Netherlands鈥 Delft University of Technology, who鈥檚 working on an electricity-generating inflatable wing called .
Makani is currently testing a 20-kilowatt airplane-inspired turbine, which circles in the air like a parafoil. Made with 27-foot-wide carbon-fiber wings, it can reach heights of up to 1,300 feet, compared with a maximum 500 feet for land-based turbines. When the wind isn鈥檛 strong enough to keep the wing aloft, a docking station reels it in. Like those on the ground, airborne models would likely be combined into groups of dozens or even hundreds. To maximize -potential power, Makani鈥檚 turbines would need to fly at a minimum of 500 feet鈥攚hich could require amending current FAA regulations.
As for Montague, after the Google X acquisition, he bowed out of the company and got back to building that kite-powered catamaran to sail around the world. He鈥檚 confident Makani will be the first to market with a commercially viable airborne wind turbine, which he says is still at least five years out.
鈥淚s it a race? It doesn鈥檛 really matter who鈥檚 first,鈥 Montague says. 鈥淚f anyone is in production in five years, then we all win.鈥