国产吃瓜黑料

GET MORE WITH OUTSIDE+

Enjoy 35% off GOES, your essential outdoor guide

UPGRADE TODAY

If you buy through our links, we may earn an affiliate commission. This supports our mission to get more people active and outside. Learn more

But for temporary visitors to the highest places on earth, Barcroft鈥檚 claim is self-evident: mountains make you weak and stupid.
But for temporary visitors to the highest places on earth, Barcroft鈥檚 claim is self-evident: mountains make you weak and stupid. (Photo: Nathan Hadley/Tandem)
Sweat Science

Why Mountains Make You Dumber

We know that cognitive function is impaired at high altitude, but it鈥檚 not entirely clear why

Published:  Updated: 
But for temporary visitors to the highest places on earth, Barcroft鈥檚 claim is self-evident: mountains make you weak and stupid.
(Photo: Nathan Hadley/Tandem)

New perk: Easily find new routes and hidden gems, upcoming running events, and more near you. Your weekly Local Running Newsletter has everything you need to lace up! .

In 1925, the eminent physiologist Joseph Barcroft, fresh from a pioneering high-altitude research expedition to heights of Cerro de Pasco in Peru, made a provocative claim. 鈥淎ll dwellers at high altitude,鈥 he wrote, 鈥渁re persons of impaired physical and mental power.鈥 The accuracy of that statement remains , to put it mildly, nearly a century later. Highlanders in the Andes and Himalayas, whose ancestors have lived above 10,000 feet for thousands of years, beg to differ. But for temporary visitors to the highest places on earth, Barcroft鈥檚 claim is self-evident: mountains make you weak and stupid.

It鈥檚 not obvious why, though. The obvious culprit for reduced cognitive function is the thin high-altitude air depriving your brain of oxygen. The resulting impairment of judgment and decision-making can have serious and sometimes fatal consequences when you鈥檙e choosing routes, scaling cliffs, and assessing weather and snow conditions. But there are lots of other factors beyond the oxygen levels during a typical alpine expedition that might dull your judgment, such as聽sleep deprivation, dehydration, and simple physical exhaustion from the prolonged effort it took to get there.

, from researchers at Ruhr-University Bochum and the German Sport University Cologne, tries to sort some of this confusion out with an ambitious experiment. They tested cognitive performance in 80 volunteers under one of four different conditions:

  • Altitude plus prolonged exercise (during an ascent of Mount Kilimanjaro)
  • No altitude plus prolonged exercise (during a seven-day 鈥渂ackcountry ski hiking tour in the high plateaus Setesdal and Sirdalheiane in the south of Norway鈥)
  • Altitude plus no exercise (in an altitude chamber set to 12,500 and 19,000 feet, roughly equivalent to the two elevations where testing was performed on Kilimanjaro)
  • No altitude plus no exercise (basically sitting on the couch in sweatpants)

Cognitive function was measured with the , a pattern recognition test that assesses 鈥渁lertness, focused attention, divided attention, and vigilance.鈥 The researchers chose to focus on 鈥渁ttentional dysfunction鈥 because it鈥檚 a form of cognitive impairment that can have particularly disastrous effects on mountain expeditions, where ropes and crevasses and weather demand constant focus. Interpreting the results isn鈥檛 entirely straightforward, since the test spits out separate measures of speed, accuracy, and continuity of attention. But there are some telling patterns in the data.

The most unambiguous鈥攁nd unsurprising鈥攆inding is that the Kilimanjaro group had seriously impaired attentional capacity at the summit, though not at the lower 12,500-foot testing point. The altitude chamber group also showed signs of impairment at the 19,000-foot elevation, but nowhere near as pronounced. And the backcountry skiers, who were skiing four to 10 hours a day carrying packs weighing up to 45 pounds then sleeping in huts, showed no decline at all in their cognitive test scores.

It鈥檚 important to note that there are many differences between climbing a mountain in Africa, skiing to a hut in Norway, and sitting in a sterile lab in northwestern Germany. It鈥檚 possible that the test results were skewed by the effects of travel, or the ambient temperature, or the characteristics of the subjects (since the groups were chosen voluntarily rather than assigned randomly).

But if the general patterns are correct, we can draw two conclusions. First, thin air alone doesn鈥檛 fully explain the cognitive deficits observed in mountain climbers, since the Kilimanjaro group fared worse than the altitude chamber group. And second, fatigue from prolonged exercise doesn鈥檛 explain the difference, since the ski touring group didn鈥檛 show any negative effects. It鈥檚 possible that there鈥檚 an interaction effect: prolonged exercise only takes a toll when it occurs at high altitude. Or it鈥檚 possible that some of the other factors like sleep deprivation and dehydration play a significant role.

That last option would be the best one, from a practical sense. If you鈥檙e heading out for a big adventure in the mountains, there鈥檚 not a whole lot you can do about either the thin air or the prolonged physical exertion. (Okay, you can take supplemental oxygen, but that鈥檚 a pretty niche solution. And you can hire someone to carry all your gear and give you a piggyback ride, but where鈥檚 the fun in that?) Sleep and dehydration, on the other hand, are much more modifiable. Neither is easy at high altitudes鈥攂ut if you make them a priority, there鈥檚 potential for improvement.


My new book,聽, with a foreword by Malcolm Gladwell, is now available. For more, join me on聽听补苍诲听, and sign up for the Sweat Science聽.

Popular on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online