国产吃瓜黑料

GET MORE WITH OUTSIDE+

Enjoy 35% off GOES, your essential outdoor guide

UPGRADE TODAY

Ours is not a real brand. It鈥檚 a browser-based art exhibit at the New Museum designed by Samuel Marion, an artist who focuses on digital spaces and contemporary culture.
Ours is not a real brand. It鈥檚 a browser-based art exhibit at the New Museum designed by Samuel Marion, an artist who focuses on digital spaces and contemporary culture. (Photo: Samuel Marion)

When Corporate Activism Has a Dark Side

In Ours, a digital exhibition for the New Museum, artist Samuel Marion imagines a not too distant future in which outdoor brands use slick advertising to mask more sinister aims

Published: 
Ours is not a real brand. It鈥檚 a browser-based art exhibit at the New Museum designed by Samuel Marion, an artist who focuses on digital spaces and contemporary culture.
(Photo: Samuel Marion)

New perk: Easily find new routes and hidden gems, upcoming running events, and more near you. Your weekly Local Running Newsletter has everything you need to lace up! .

The website for the brand Ours looks like any other ad you鈥檇 be served on Instagram. On ,听visitors are invited to discover what the company is all about, with minimal capitalization and chunky serif fonts laidover soothing photos of tents and mountain bikers in wide-open spaces. 鈥淎t Ours, we believe in protecting Americans and their environment,鈥 the site says, in a seemingly innocuous echo of pretty much every U.S.outdoor brand鈥檚 philanthropic mission statement. But it quickly becomes clear that something is very off: 鈥淲e鈥檙e asking you to take a stand to protect America against overpopulation, because right now, nature can鈥檛 protect itself.鈥 Another page elaborates: 鈥淥urs grew out of a small garage that made non-lethal military defense weapons鈥e take localism very seriously鈥攁nd we鈥檙e happy to share our 鈥楲ocals Only鈥 attitude of defense technology with outdoor lifestyles.鈥

Oursis not a real brand. It鈥檚 a browser-based designed by Samuel Marion, an artist who focuses on digital spaces and contemporary culture. Marion grew up in the outdoor hub of Salida, Colorado, but swears the site isn鈥檛 鈥渟ome deep-seated, psychoanalytic adolescent resentment coming out.鈥 When he started putting it together in听2019, he considered it more akin to a speculative, sci-fi view of the outdoor industry. But the exhibit ended up getting at dynamics that are already at play in outdoor brands, and as Marion wrote in an , Ours sometimes felt 鈥渟o close to reality that it seemed to hardly differentiate itself from it.鈥

(Samuel Marion)

Marion first started thinking about the project while being bombarded with ads online and all over the subway in New York City, where he lives. He specifically cites the men鈥檚 wellness brand听 as inspiration, with its signs featuring , and very little indication that the company is听selling hair-loss supplements and erectile dysfunction medication. It鈥檚 the height of brand-as-euphemism鈥攍ess about aspiration than sneaking unglamorous ideas into consumers鈥 heads with a friendly, accessible gloss. Marion wanted to take that idea to its extreme conclusion. 鈥淚 was really interested in how you could create this box around something that looks necessarily good and well-intentioned, and then stick something inside of it that was horrible and nasty听and see听how long does that hold up,鈥 he says. The outdoor industry, with its wholesome image and uncontroversial message听that everyone deserves to get out there, seemed like a natural fit for the experiment. What if a brand sold a mission of population control, anti-immigration policies, and white supremacy鈥攂ut painted it over in pastel tones and 鈥渢his land is our land鈥 messaging?

Ours leads visitors through a digital maze that鈥檚 disorienting by design. Users can click through multiple vague pages that advertise听how to 鈥溾澨齛nd eventually lead to reassurances that people don鈥檛 need to do anything but keep adventuring: 鈥淲hile we help you pursue your passion of exploring the American outdoors, you鈥檙e helping us find and deport unwanted persons鈥e think of it as a 鈥榙o good鈥 tax on all our products.鈥 The shop features unbuyable items with hidden meanings in their names, like the , named after anti-immigration figure . Marion made it obvious in certain spots that this is fiction: Ours听donates to organizations like 鈥減rivate border defense groups, organic farms, radical lobbyists, [and] recycling programs鈥 and partners with a fictional group听called the Malthusian Initiative. But once you鈥檝e caught on to what Ours is really selling, even its more harmless-sounding language takes on a different connotation. One page simply reads 鈥溾澨齛nd offers vague language about 鈥渒eeping the chaos out,鈥 but anyone who鈥檚 gotten to that point will understand the subtext.

(Samuel Marion)

Though it鈥檚 generally clear that听Ours听is satire, it鈥檚 unsettling to see how easily the language of the outdoor industry can be twisted to take on a double meaning. shows an image of a skier boot-packing up a mountain, overlaid with 鈥淢ore of this,鈥 followed by a bird鈥檚-eye view of a gray, densely populated city, overlaid with 鈥淟ess of this.鈥 This statement could have appeared, word for word, on an actual outdoor brand鈥檚 website. Like Ours, gear brands sell a version of the outdoors that offers escapism and entertainment for recreationists with money to spend. But听as outdoor activists have been pointing out for years, not everyone gets to enjoy the blissful image of nature that these brands are selling.

There are socioeconomic, physical, and geographic barriers to access听and countless ways people are made to feel like they鈥檙e doing it wrong, getting in the way of more experienced outdoorspeople, or otherwise unwelcome. These structural barriers are upheld in part by us-versus-them attitudes that, consciously or not, frame access to pristine landscapes as a right only for some (often the wealthy and white). This mindset can manifest itself in grousing about overcrowding at national parks, militant , or neglecting urban areas in conversations about environmentalism and recreational opportunities. It can result in grave environmental injustices, one of the most obvious being that , , and are disproportionately built in places where they will affect poor people and people of color. It鈥檚 no coincidence that affluent communities can more easily fight these developments, just as they can more easily act on their disdain for crowds and get away from it all with their pricey, lightweight hiking gear.

At its most extreme, this sense of entitlement can look like the eco-fascist ideology of Ours, which blames the destruction of the environment on immigration and overpopulation. In researching Ours, Marion took a lot of inspiration from John Hultgren鈥檚 book听, which explores how anti-immigration values show up more subtly in many environmentalists鈥 efforts. When Marion started developing Ours, 鈥渢his overlap of wellness and fascism and exclusion seemed really distant,鈥 he says. 鈥淎nd now it doesn鈥檛.鈥

(Samuel Marion)

Companies that run the gamut from clothing brands to fossil fuel corporations are frequently accused of greenwashing, or putting on flimsy, aesthetically pleasing听shows of eco-friendliness while continuing with business as usual. Ours raises the possibility that the outdoor industry鈥檚 positive image can obscure legitimate concerns about unsavory practices and attitudes. This is especially true because it鈥檚 harder to find fault with, say,a climbing gear brand than with Shell or BP, and it鈥檚 easier for customers to feel that in purchasing from outdoor companies, they鈥檙e acting on admirable values. Where鈥檚 the queasiness in buying a reusable, chemical-free water bottle to help you stay hydrated while unobtrusively exploring your local trail system? Call it outdoors-washing. A company built on shiny nature-for-all values can more easily rest on its laurels and fend off concerns about access, privilege, and responsible business practices. But it鈥檚 clearly worth asking questions of these brands, too.听In 2018, companies like MEC and REI refused to sell products from brands under Vista Outdoor, including CamelBak, because the parent company owned a brand that made AR-15鈥檚. It was one of the only times a company in the outdoor industry has been held responsible for .

Ours is an overtly evil brand, but every brand has its own set of interests that probably don鈥檛 make it into ad copy. It鈥檚 not that outdoor听brandsare inherently awful鈥攊t鈥檚 that they often wriggle out of critical questioning by promoting the idea that outdoors-oriented values are inherently good. As Marion writes in his essay, 鈥淭he more the brand stresses the positive environmental impact of their philanthropy, the more the brand paddles (skins? boulders?) away from the criticality conventionally imposed on profit-seeking ventures.鈥 It鈥檚 a funny way of getting at the unsettling feeling Ours leaves viewers with. Ours makes a show of paddling away from criticism with slick aesthetics, but in the end it鈥檚 just a front for blatant white supremacy. If, on the other hand, you鈥檙e skeptical about a real gear company鈥檚 dedication to equality in the outdoors鈥攄id you not see the friendly ads proclaiming that you鈥檙e totally welcome to pitch your tent wherever you want?

Lead Photo: Samuel Marion

Popular on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online