Remaining Native begins with a warning: This is a film that doesn’t shy away from abuse, violence, or any of the other crimes that darken Native American history. But that’s also the film’s strength: The feature-length documentary captures what it means to be a , balancing joys and tragedies in a way that will resonate with any athlete鈥攁nd any human being.

Remaining Native, which will be screening alongside a curated lineup of other top adventure films at this year’s 国产吃瓜黑料 Festival, is a beautiful, powerful, and important documentary by filmmaker Paige Bethmann, a Houdenosaunee (Mohawk/Oneida) woman. Bethmann鈥檚 grandmother was stolen from her reservation as a girl and taken to an abusive Catholic boarding school. Tragically, Bethmann鈥檚 ancestral story is common to hundreds of thousands of Native Americans, including the subject of Remaining Native, Kutoven (鈥淜u鈥�) Stevens.

The film鈥檚 opening lines explain:

For over 100 years, the United States made violent efforts to strip Native American children of their languages, spiritual beliefs, and culture through federal and church-run boarding schools.

Many children resisted this assault on their Native identity by running away.

From this prelude, the viewer knows to take a deep breath and buckle up. But then, beauty: scenic shots of the desert landscape. A hawk high in a tree. The rhythmic sound of a runner鈥檚 footfall on an open dirt road. And we鈥檙e introduced to the boyish face and voice of the film鈥檚 hero, Ku Stevens.

Ku is a runner鈥攐ne of the best in the state of Nevada, having clocked the fastest time across all divisions in the high school state cross country championships. Through interviews, voiceovers, and scenes of Ku living with his parents on the Paiute Indian Reservation in the small town of Yerington, we get to know the teenager. We learn that he鈥檚 always wanted to run for the University of Oregon and pushes himself to be the best he can be.

Like most runners, he says that when he runs, he thinks about his breathing and his body. But, he adds, he also imagines running for his life.

Stevens’s great-grandfather ran away from the Stewart Indian Boarding School three times. His last attempt was a successful escape. That legacy is often on Stevens’s mind.

The film does a fantastic job of weaving together inspiring action scenes that any sports fan can appreciate with sepia-toned historical images set to haunting tribal music.

鈥淭his land I was raised on, it feels heavy,鈥� says Stevens. Through shots of barren landscape and close-up faces of those who live here, we feel it.

Parents of teens will appreciate the internal struggle of Stevens’s father, who loves and supports his son, but fears he鈥檒l lose his ancestral heritage by moving off the reservation. Still, he and his wife do everything they can to help the young runner reach his goals.

One of the most exhilarating scenes of Remaining Native takes place at a high school track meet, where Stevens attempts to run the 3200-meter under nine minutes鈥攁 benchmark that’s become the recruiting standard for distance athletes hoping to run for the University of Oregon. The racing drama is on-par with any Olympic final or Disney sports movie.

Among the most poignant moments of Remaining Native鈥攁nd there are many鈥攃omes with a slow pan of a black-and-white image from a Catholic boarding school. Native American children sit with pained faces, hair cut short, sadness in their eyes. A drumbeat plays, as if to hammer into our awareness that this bit of American history, when thousands of Native American children were stolen from their families and died or survived abuse, happened. It actually happened. And yet, people like Ku and his family keep fighting for their culture while trying to heal from their past.

At one point in the film, Stevens says, 鈥淚 really just want people to understand鈥攏ot just to know what happened, not just to learn from our history鈥攂ut to fully understand why we feel the way that we do.鈥�

At one point in the film, the teen explains that his name, 鈥淜utoven,鈥� refers to 鈥渢he eagle bringing the light from the darkness鈥� and that he doesn鈥檛 yet feel he lives up to its meaning. Viewers of Remaining Native will beg to differ.

See Remaining Native鈥攁nd other captivating documentaries from top adventure filmmakers鈥攁t the 国产吃瓜黑料 Festival, May 31-June 1 in Denver. This year’s festival will also host a group run and talks from top endurance athletes from across the country. .听 听

The post 鈥淩emaining Native” is for Runners鈥攁nd for all Human Beings appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

The sun is shining, the birds are chirping. Summer鈥檚 longer days and warmer temperatures make for fun and free running. There鈥檚 just one problem: The heat can sap your running performance and enjoyment. Choosing the right apparel in summer鈥攊n the same way you bundle up in winter鈥攃an make the conditions not only bearable, but fun.

In this season, we need running shirts that slip on effortlessly when we鈥檙e still half-asleep in the morning, and float on our skin when we鈥檙e cramming in a tempo workout on a sticky afternoon. We searched for, and found, the best women鈥檚 running tops鈥攖-shirts and tanks鈥攖hat can handle the challenges of summer while making us look good and feel cool.

Update May 2025: We selected new running tops in all but one category, carrying over the perennially popular Tracksmith Session Tee. We also added objective lab measurements on air permeability and dry time to help you select the best summer running shirt for you. Be sure to check out the 鈥淗ow We Test鈥� section below for more details on our methodologies and how to interpret the lab data.

At a Glance

• Best Tee for Hot Weather Running:
• Best Tank for Hot Weather Running:
• Best Raceday Tank:
• Most Versatile Tank:
• Most Versatile Tee:
• Best Value:
• Best Trail Running Tank:
• Best Trail Running Tee:
• Softest Tank:
• Softest Tee:
• What to Look For
• How We Tested Running Tops In the Field and the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab
• Meet Our Lead Testers

How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

Best T-Shirt for Hot Weather

Craft Pro Hypervent Running Tee 2.0

Sizes: XS-XL

Pros and Cons
鈯� Extremely lightweight
鈯� Seamless comfort
鈯� Shows sweat

Lab Dry Time: 3 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 3 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

In summer heat, a shirt that feels barely there and still provides shoulder coverage is a Godsend, and the Craft Hypervent Tee 2.0 delivers. It鈥檚 made of a super-lightweight recycled polyester/elastane blend that isn鈥檛 the fastest drying or airiest but is silky smooth against the skin with a mesh back that breathes well while still shielding us from the sun. 鈥淚t鈥檚 great for summer heat because it鈥檚 so lightweight鈥攊t flitters like an aspen leaf,鈥� raved a tester.

Taped seams at the neck and sleeves are comfortable (no chafing) and add to the shirt鈥檚 feminine silhouette. The sleeves are cut longer than regular tees and add coverage, while the raglan design allows unrestricted arm movement. 鈥淣o seams is a huge plus for me,鈥� said a tester who also loved the lack of a papery tag rubbing the back of her neck. 鈥淭his was a shirt I didn’t have to think about while running,鈥� said another.

Best Tank for Hot Weather

Patagonia Capilene Cool Daily Tank

Sizes: XS-XL

Pros and Cons
鈯� Extremely lightweight
鈯� Minimal branding allows versatility
鈯� Runs large

Lab Dry Time: 4 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 3 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

We loved the feel of this tank for everything from warm-weather runs in Colorado to high-humidity hikes in the Caribbean. Testers described the recycled polyester Capilene Cool fabric as 鈥渆xtremely lightweight鈥� and said it helped them 鈥渕aintain comfort while sweating.鈥� The thin fabric dries quickly, a bonus in summer heat, whether on the run, during water sports like stand-up paddleboarding, or when traveling.

Like most Patagonia apparel, the fit of this tank runs a little large, but we liked the relaxed shape. It鈥檚 one tester鈥檚 go-to shirt while wearing compression-style bootie shorts. 鈥淚 like the coverage of the longer cut,鈥� she said. We also loved the versatility of the tank鈥檚 styling鈥攖he only visible branding is a tiny Patagonia tag at the bottom seam, so it doesn鈥檛 look overly athletic and out of place off the trail.

Best Raceday Tank

Hoka Airolite Run Tank

Sizes: XS-XXL

Pros and Cons
鈯� Airy fabric and cut
鈯� Fabric is rated 40+ UPF
鈯� Higher neckline provides coverage
鈯� Can creep up under a pack

Lab Dry Time: 2 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 5 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

This tank is ready for race day with a highly breathable material and a slim fit that stays out of the way of an arm swing. We love the airy feel of the super lightweight pinhole mesh combined with an even-more-open mesh panel on the upper back鈥搕he whole tank breathes fantastically. It鈥檚 thin, super lightweight, and feels cool against the skin. 鈥淚 definitely noticed it helped keep me feeling cooler and dry even when sweating heavily in higher temps,鈥� said a tester. 鈥淚t feels very performance-oriented,鈥� said another. In the lab, it scored the highest mark for air permeability among all shirts tested. The fabric is so light that it crept up a bit while we tested it under a hydration vest, but it stays perfectly put on its own.

Most Versatile Tank

Brooks Luxe Tank

Sizes: XS-XXL

Pros and Cons
鈯� Super soft
鈯� Minimal branding
鈯� Underarm seams slightly rub (but not chafe)

Lab Dry Time: 3 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 2 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

This soft, breathable, minimally branded tank looks so good we鈥檝e worn it casually to run errands around town, but the stylishness doesn鈥檛 compromise how well it feels and moves on the run. The cut is slightly long and loose, which makes it comfortable, flattering, and adds to its versatile appeal鈥攊t can work both tucked in or left out. 鈥淪o soft and breathable,鈥� said a tester, while another marveled at how lightweight the material felt against her skin.

A couple testers noted the underarm cut was a tad high, making the non-flat seams rub their armpits, but it was more of an irritation than a run-ruining situation鈥攏o chafing. But that was easy to overlook given the tank鈥檚 versatility. 鈥淭his tank is great to layer under a long sleeve for a morning run when it starts cool and will warm up,鈥� said one tester. 鈥淚 also love it for a short run, when it can double as a casual tank to run errands in before or after.鈥�

Most Versatile Tee

Tracksmith Session Tee

Sizes: XS-XL

Pros and Cons
鈯� Versatile
鈯� Soft and Stretchy
鈯� Runs slightly large

Lab Dry Time: 1 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 2 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

We鈥檝e used this as a go-to running tee and an all-day tee鈥攚earing it casually throughout the day then on an evening run. One tester even slept in it. Made of 84 percent polyester and 16 percent spandex, the Session Tee is exceptionally stretchy. It鈥檚 also finished with an odor-resistant treatment that seems to work: We鈥檝e worn it for multiple runs without washing and swear that we鈥檙e not offending trail partners. (They concur.) The Session Tee dries slower and is less airy than other high-performance tops鈥攕o it isn鈥檛 the best choice for the hottest days鈥攂ut makes up for that in soft comfort and style.

鈥淚鈥檓 in love with everything about this shirt: the fit, the fabric, the performance,鈥� said a tester. 鈥淚t felt like a hang out shirt that I could run in!鈥� another raved, 鈥淚 forgot about this shirt during the run because it was so comfy and has the most perfect fit!鈥�

Best Value

2XU Aero Singlet

Sizes: XXS-XL

Pros and Cons
鈯� Lightweight and breathable
鈯� Reflective detailing
鈯� Can feel loose around the midsection (this can also be a positive)

Lab Dry Time: 5 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 3 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

It鈥檚 hard to find well-functioning running apparel under 40 bucks, but this tank delivers. Its lightweight, sweat-wicking front (a double-knit recycled polyester), combined with a super-breathable mesh back kept us cool for all our summer running. 鈥淭his tank wicked sweat away, didn鈥檛 chafe, and was very comfortable in warmer temps,鈥� said a tester.

The simple cut provides a bit more coverage on the backside than traditional racerback tanks, and has a looser fit around the middle. Some felt it to be too baggy at the waist and loose on the lower back while others liked the flowy feel. Reflective details add safety in dusk and dawn light.

鈥淭he lightweight fabric throughout seems inherently breathable,鈥� said one who also praised how quickly sweat dried. 鈥淭he fabric is slightly textured as opposed to just one single layer which seemed to encourage even more airflow, and it dried quickly,鈥� said another. The lab confirmed the testers observations: this tank had the best combined performance scores of all the tops we tested.

Best Trail Running Tank

Arc鈥檛eryx Norvan Tank

Sizes: XXS-XXL

Pros and Cons
鈯� Wide shoulder straps work well under a pack
鈯� Lightweight, airy, and quick-drying
鈯� 80 bucks is a lot for a tank

Lab Dry Time: 5 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 2.5 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

Some tank shoulder straps can start to rub underneath a hydration vest or traditional running pack straps, but not the straps on this one. A wider cut at the shoulders stayed flat and in place under a pack during hours of mountain running in Colorado鈥檚 Indian Peak Wilderness.

This is a looser-fitting tank, which we loved for its forgiving fit all around and slightly longer cut. The material鈥攁 softer polyester frontside with a meshy backside鈥攆eels great against the skin, breathes well, and dries quickly (the fastest-drying of all the tops here, according to the lab). All seams remained comfortable over hours of wear as well鈥攏o chafing here.

Best Trail Running Tee

Black Diamond Distance SS Tech Tee

Sizes: XS-XL

Pros and Cons
鈯� Extremely lightweight, breathable, and quick drying
鈯� Zero irritation over long wear
鈯� Not as cottony feeling as some others

Lab Dry Time: 4 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 3 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

We鈥檝e worn this tee under a pack over multi-day runs from hut to hut in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, as well as on multiple short runs around the Boulder Foothills and neighborhood suburbs. This shirt performs: It鈥檚 super-quick-drying, moisture-wicking, highly breathable polyester jersey material with a 鈥淨uick Dry鈥� finish that never feels bogged down with sweat. The Anti-Odor finish also proved effective鈥攄id we mention that multi-day, multi-wear hut trip? We got no complaints from our running mates. Flat lock seams, a flat hem, and lack of a tag add to overall comfort, as does this shirt鈥檚 ridiculously lightweight feel on the body.

鈥淟oved the material. It’s loose, super ventilated and fits well throughout,鈥� raved a tester. 鈥淓xcellent performance,鈥� said another.

Softest Tank

Rabbit EZ Tank

Sizes: XXS-XXL

Pros and Cons
鈯� Super soft and comfortable
鈯� Bonded seams
鈯� Runs small (size up!)

Lab Dry Time: 4 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 2 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

Talk about buttery soft. This tank is made from the brand鈥檚 recycled polyester/spandex blend that feels like your favorite old cotton t-shirt, softened in the wash after decades of use. But unlike cotton, this material dries quickly after being soaked in sweat. While the material might not be as breathable as some other techier-feeling tanks or tees in this roundup, it feels fantastic on the skin and still performs even when damp. 鈥淭he softness and overall comfort made up for the lack of breathability,鈥� said a tester. 鈥淚t’s become one of my favorites. It’s just very 鈥榚z鈥� to wear.鈥� We find ourselves reaching for this tank, and the Rabbit EZ Tee, for lounging; it鈥檚 that comfortable.

Bonded seams around the armholes and neckline remained soft and proved irritation-free for our team of testers.

Softest Tee

Oiselle Flyout Boxy Short Sleeve

Sizes: 2-14

Pros and Cons
鈯� Great combo of style and function
鈯� Great range of sizing
鈯� Takes longer to dry than some

Lab Dry Time: 3 (1=worst; 5=best)
Lab Air Permeability: 4 (1=worst; 5=best)
How We Tested Running Shirts In the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

This comfortable, functional tee converted more than one non-crop-top-wearing tester into big fans. The polyester/lyocell/spandex fabric felt fantastically soft next to the skin and kept us dry when we sweat鈥攖he fabric effectively moves moisture to the outer layer where it evaporates. (While the sweat doesn鈥檛 stay against the body, it does seem to remain on the shirt鈥檚 fabric for longer than some quick-dry materials.)

The boxy, crop-style cut adds airflow. We loved it when paired with high-rise thin tights on warm runs and appreciated the cut for gym workouts. 鈥淚 liked how I could see my toes in a plank!鈥� said one.

How To Choose a Running Top

When it comes to summer running clothes, look for comfort, breathability, moisture-wicking, and a chafe-free fit.

Comfort

Aside from chafe-free seams and a cut that allows full arm movement without restriction, consider how the tank or tee makes you feel. Are you comfortable wearing the top both on a run and stopping for coffee afterward? Are you looking for a tank that makes you feel fast on raceday? Do you want a tee that also makes you feel comfortable鈥攂oth in function and style鈥� in the gym?

Materials

Breathable, sweat-wicking materials are essential, as is how the material feels against your skin. While some fabric blends prioritize breathability and quick-drying, others provide a more cottony feel鈥攖he latter sometimes stay wet from sweat longer than the prior, but the tradeoff is sometimes worth it. All tops in this round up perform great on the run.

Fit

The fabric, cut, and seam placement should not restrict your arm movement or your breathing. The best-fitting tops let you forget that you鈥檙e wearing them. Some will fit looser or boxier around the middle, while some have a more streamlined fit. Consider what you鈥檙e after and shop from there. (Our guide describes the fit of each top.)

Tanks vs Tees

T-shirts provide more coverage and therefore more sun protection, and they can also deliver more of a cooling effect, depending on the fabric and fit. Tank tops are typically less restricting and more breathable, because of their lack of sleeves. That doesn鈥檛 mean all tank tops have freedom of movement. Some fit more streamlined around the midsection than others, while some are looser. The looser ones tend to allow airflow, while the more narrow silhouettes depend on their fabrication for breathability. In addition to fit, consider how much skin exposure and coverage you鈥檙e comfortable with, and how the tank interacts with your sports bra and running vest, if you鈥檒l be wearing one. And consider all the settings where you鈥檒l want to wear the top, both athletic and casual.

How We Test

• Number of testers: 8
• Number of products tested: 75
• Number of miles logged while testing: 2,500

We tested as many different shorts, tanks, tees, and other kinds of summer apparel (like sun shirts and crop tops) as we could get our hands on between June and October 2024, with an eye toward products that would be new to consumers in 2025. Our testers ranged in age from 20 to 40, each with more than a decade of running experience and at least one ultramarathon under their belt. We evaluated products by comfort first, followed by style, utility (ability to multitask as casual wear was a big plus), and durability. We also compared the new shirts to those test in the previous year and retained any that were still available and performed better than anything new in their categories.

How We Tested Running Shirts in the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab

Air Permeability

Air permeability is a measure of how much air (in volume) is able to move through a fabric. It is not the same as “breathability” which measures how moisture vapor (sweat) moves through a fabric. The more air permeable, the more the cooling breeze makes it through your shirt and reaches your skin directly. To test this in the 国产吃瓜黑料 Lab @ CU Denver, we use a James Heal AirPro, a machine that uses a vacuum pump to pull air through fabric clamped between plates with a specific diameter opening to measure the flow rate at a pre-set pressure. The greater the volume of air getting through, the more air permeable. This lab test only evaluates the material itself, and can’t account for how the cut and design of a garment aids its airiness.

Dry Time

The lab tested drying time by soaking each shirt and then recording how long each needed to dry. Each shirt was weighed while dry, then soaked in tap water until all of the material had absorbed water. After soaking, they were hand wrung until all excess water stopped releasing from the fabric, leaving a fully saturated, but not soaked, shirt. The saturated shirts were weighed again to get the “wet” starting point and then put on a mannequin to dry. Weight was recorded every hour to start and then every 15 minutes as they approached dryness, stopping when the sample was within 4 percent of the original dry value. Allowing for 4 percent of weight gain (a few grams) takes into account any dirt particles that could be introduced from the tap water or environment, and small hemmed areas of the shirt that may hold a little moisture, even though the overwhelming majority of the shirt is dry.

We compiled the raw data into groups of similar values for each measure to obtain scores of 1 to 5, worst to best, relative to all the t-shirts and singlets tested.

Meet Our Lead Tester

Lisa Jhung writes, runs, and generally adventures from her homebase in Boulder, Colorado. Raised as a California beach kid, she also makes it back to the coast鈥攁ny coast, but primarily the Pacific鈥攁s often as possible. She鈥檚 been testing gear for 国产吃瓜黑料 for a couple of decades and co-manages the road and trail running shoe tests, and maanages the women鈥檚 running apparel, sports bras, and running hydration vest tests.

The post The Best Running Shirts and Tank Tops for Women: Field and Lab Tested appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

It鈥檚 the season we celebrate dads and grads鈥攖wo groups who have plenty of fans. Two groups who can benefit from a gift that allows them to be self-sufficient, able to solve problems, and ready for adventures of all sorts. A high-quality, durable multi-tool will do that for years to come.

Tim Leatherman had the idea for the first-ever multi-tool鈥攅quipped with needle-nose pliers鈥攚hen he and his wife were traveling around Europe as young twentysomethings on a budget. They often found themselves needing to fix leaky plumbing and the fussy Fiat 600 they bought in the Netherlands.

For the past four decades, Leatherman has pioneered the design of ever better and more capable tools, enabling people to tackle everything from minor repairs to saving their own lives (). The storied brand continues to design and manufacture knives and multi-tools in Portland, Oregon, and every Leatherman comes with a 25-year limited warranty. What better gift to give the dads in your life and the grads heading off on their next adventures, whatever they may be?

For Father鈥檚 Day

Enable Dad to tackle DIY jobs and outdoor adventures by putting fix-it options in the palm of his hand

($250): The most premium tool on the market, the ARC puts 20 tools at your fingertips and is one-hand operable. From a knife blade made of MagnaCut steel, which maintains its sharp edge and resists corrosion, to a suite of features including a bit driver, awl, wire cutter, and needle-nose pliers, the ARC sets the standard as the top-of-the-line tool.

($120): The bestselling multi-tool of all time features 18 tools, many of which鈥攊ncluding scissors, screwdrivers, a bottle opener, and a wire stripper鈥攃an be accessed with the tool in its folded and closed position. Open it up, and the Wave+ equips Dad with tools like a saw, knife, and diamond-coated wood/metal file.

($90): Perfect for the DIY dad who wants a tool that鈥檚 full-featured but a little more compact, the Rebar packs 17 tools鈥攊ncluding two kinds of pliers, an electrical crimper, and wire stripper鈥攊nto a four-inch frame. All 17 tools lock into position and won鈥檛 fold under pressure. A range of color options allows for personalization.

($140): The Signal is ideal for dads who camp, fish, and backpack. Measuring 4.5 inches, this multi-tool features 19 tools, including a fire-starting ferro rod, safety whistle, and built-in hammer that comes in handy for anchoring tent stakes. Bonus: Find just the right look for every dad with a new-for-summer range of color options.

For Graduation

Nothing says 鈥渞eady for the next adventure鈥� like graduation鈥攅quip new grads for the journey with a high-performance multi-tool

($50): Since when did 50 bucks put so many functional items in the palm of your hand? The ten-tool Leatherman packs down to a mere 2.5 inches and can clip to a keychain. Tools like tweezers, a nail file, and spring-action scissors make this a no-brainer gift for any grad.

($70): At just 5.8 ounces and with a contoured, ergonomic design for comfort, the Bond is a great choice for grads who appreciate sleek style and easy carrying. But there鈥檚 no compromise on function: The Bond is packed with 14 tools and comes with a matching carrying sheath.

($90): This tool somehow manages to be both minimalist and totally capable, with a 2.6-inch knife blade, a large bit driver, and five other tools. A nice touch most grads (and probably dads) will appreciate: The carabiner loop doubles as a bottle opener. The Skeletool CX is available in an array of colors.

($70): The Wingman packs 14 tools into a 3.8-inch package and includes a combo straight-edge and serrated knife that enhances versatility. Designed with everything a grad may need for jobs around the house, apartment, condo, or campsite, it鈥檚 the perfect wingman.

Founded in 1983 by Tim Leatherman, Oregon-based Leatherman Tool Group is the world鈥檚 largest manufacturer of high-quality multipurpose products. Built upon three principles鈥攗nwavering perseverance, ingenious design, and the ability to save the day鈥擫eatherman has empowered people around the world to solve problems big and small. Leatherman is proudly based and manufactured in Portland, Oregon, where the brand鈥檚 factory is located in the same building as the company headquarters. Learn more at .

The post Tools for Dads and Grads appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

Do you know what the absolute perfect Mother鈥檚 Day gift is? A well-coordinated family activity in the great outdoors with mom鈥檚 loving children not complaining about any of it, the entire time.

But we know that a family hike, backpacking trip, camping overnight, bike ride, paddle, or climb can be hard to pull off, especially with everyone involved and happily participating. So, instead, here are ten tangible ideas you can gift the outdoorsy mom in your life.

For Water Women: Surfers, Paddleboarders, Kayakers, and Swimmers

Shop for durable bathing suits that allow them to be active and come with a promise of water adventures. (To know what size to buy, check her current bathing suit drawer.) Our picks: Outerknown’s ($128), Carve Designs’ ($52) and ($58), or Patagonia’s ($65 $49) and ($75).

听($35)

This completely waterproof bag holds a car or house key, key FOB, credit card, money, or other small necessities and is small enough to fit in the back pocket of her board shorts. It can also be attached to her surfboard, SUP, or kayak. It鈥檚 made out of discarded aviation life vests, helping keep urethane-coated nylon out of the landfills and the ocean.

($54)

These towels are lightweight, quick-drying, easily portable because they鈥檙e thin and pack down small, and look great. Since being gifted one of these by my son, I鈥檝e used it as my lap swimming towel, my travel towel, and what I grab to dry off after SUP sessions. Choosing a design that makes you think of your mom (or mother of your children) will make her heart melt. Trust me.

For Dirt Divas: Gravel/Mountain Bikers and Trail Runners

($85)

Don’t underestimate the power of comfortable bike shorts (especially pairs with a funky print) to make cycling extra fun, and/or reinvigorate a person鈥檚 riding. The from Wild Rye are lightweight, compressive, and stretchy for mobility on the mountain bike.

($169)

Every trail runner needs a hydration vest to carry fluids, especially leading into summer. The comfortably holds two 500 mL HydraPak soft flasks (included) in the shoulder straps, as well as other essentials like a cell phone (which moms rarely leave home without), lip balm, and trail snacks. On the backside, a small, zippered pouch can hold first aid items, and the pass-through pocket makes a shell or other layer easy to grab or stash mid-run. Go the extra mile and put together a small first aid kit for her, buy a nice lip balm, and load the pack before gifting.

($48)

The polyester/spandex blend of Rabbit鈥檚 EZ fabric is ridiculously soft and buttery, and we love that the classic ($48) now comes in a with elastic at the side seams and an extra-long cut. The material is a pleasure to wear but also performs by breathing, wicking sweat, and drying relatively quickly. The tank can be worn running or for any other activity.

For Rock Scramblers, Summit-Seekers, and Campers

($68)

For hikers or runners who don鈥檛 always want to carry a pack but always want to carry their phones, the comfortably carries phones of all sizes in a pocket mid-back. And for wearing a backpack to carry said phone and other items, the extra-wide shoulder straps of this bra lie flat and don鈥檛 dig in underneath the pack straps.

($30)

If she鈥檚 a climber, she likely already has a chalk bag. But a second, good-looking chalk bag, especially one that鈥檚 filled with her favorite candy, is always fun. And if she鈥檚 talked about wanting to start climbing, then this is a great new activity-enabling gift.

($65)

This foldable, compact chair is ideal for car camping, or it can be taken on a hike and used for journaling or reading a book outdoors. It also works fantastically as a comfortable alternative to either hard metal stadium seating or lugging a giant camp chair across multiple outdoor sporting fields. The chair is also multi-purpose for mom-time and sports-momming.

For Any Mom (Outdoorsy or Not)

A handwritten card or thoughtful note

This truly is the best gift, as it shows thoughtfulness and care. Whether purchasing one of the above items or not, deliver it with a note of some sort. Remember: It鈥檚 the thought that counts.

More Gear Reviews

The Best Sports Bras of 2025
The Best Running Shoes for Training and Racing
The Best Backpacks, Duffels, and Roller Bags for 国产吃瓜黑料 Travel

The post 10 Last-Minute Mother鈥檚 Day Gift Ideas for Active Moms appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

Every woman is built differently and has a different idea of what makes the perfect sports bra. But every woman wants (and deserves) a bra that is comfortable and supportive, and lets her do activities with zero distraction. In light of that, we had a team of testers鈥攁ll different sizes鈥攖ry more than 30 of the latest sports bras while hiking, climbing, practicing yoga, running, weightlifting, and more to find the models that delivered the best performance and comfort for a variety of different types of bodies, conditions, and activities.

Update April 2025: We鈥檝e replaced the sports bras in four categories, added three new categories (best for summer, best for wearing a pack, and best simple running bra) and changed the categories of two we carried over from the fall round-up.

At A Glance

• Best for Hot Weather:
• Best for Wearing on Its Own:
• Best for High Impact:
• Best for Low Impact:
• Best for Large Chests:
• Best Adjustable:
• Best for Wearing With a Pack:
• Best for Carrying a Phone on the Run:
• Best Value:
• Best Simple Running Bra:
• How to Choose Sports Bras
• How We Tested
• Meet Our Lead Testers

Be sure to also check out our picks for the best women’s running shirts and tank tops.

Best for Hot Weather

Patagonia Live Simply Bra

Sizes: 齿齿厂鈥揦尝

Pros and Cons
鈯� Minimal and comfortable
鈯� Dries extremely quickly
鈯� Can fit a little loose under the arms

We鈥檝e worn this bra hiking in 106-degree heat, sweaty weight-lifting sessions, running in all sorts of weather, and jumping in and out of lakes. This bra remained comfortable throughout all of those athletic activities and even while working at a desk for hours.

Its bonded seam construction lies flat and smooth with zero irritation, and the extremely lightweight, soft, 100-percent polyester tricot fabric dries ridiculously quickly. We appreciated that, along with the anti-microbial treatment (HeiQ Mint) that combated odors when we kept the bra on after workouts. Because it doesn鈥檛 contain Spandex, the bra isn鈥檛 as supportive as some others, but it also doesn鈥檛 stretch out as much. It鈥檚 best for low-impact, or any activity for A to C cups.

Best for Wearing on Its Own

Janji Pace Sports Bra

Sizes: 齿齿厂鈥揦齿齿尝

Pros and Cons
鈯� Best range of sizes among pull-over bras
鈯� Unique, flattering and supportive straps
鈯� Removable pads come out in wash

This seemingly simple sports bra has design details we fell in love with鈥攁 flattering neckline with double straps, positioned narrower than most, that weave between each other when they cross mid back. This bra proved supportive enough even for C- to D-cup testers doing high-impact activities like running and jumping. 鈥淣ice encapsulation and I love the cross back with support!鈥� said one. 鈥淵ou don’t usually get 鈥榗ute鈥� with 鈥榮upportive.鈥欌�� We wore this skate skiing, running, cycling, and, when a tester couldn鈥檛 find her bikini, at swim lessons with her son. This bra proved comfortable and up to the task for all activities.

Best for High Impact

Rabbit UtiliBRA-vo

Sizes: 齿厂鈥揦尝

Pros and Cons
鈯� 脺ber-secure phone pocket
鈯� Classic racerback fit
鈯� Not the most breathable

If you love classic racerback bras, add a few of these to your underwear drawer. Chances are good they鈥檒l fit and support you well, as one of our testers raved: 鈥淭he fabric hits a sweet spot of compression that I think will please 85 percent of runners鈥攏ot too much, not too little.鈥� This bra also has the most secure back phone pocket we鈥檝e ever used, without being over-designed. 鈥淢ost phone pocket bras try to be all fancy and featured and space-agey,鈥� another tester said. 鈥淭his is the first one I鈥檝e tried that鈥檚 basically just a regular old racerback, both in terms of fit and looks.鈥� The polyester-spandex fabric is slightly thicker than the other favorites, making it a great choice for high-impact activities year-round.

Best for Low Impact

Under Armour UA Infinity 2.0 Low 听

听

Sizes: 齿厂鈥揦尝, Cups A鈥揅 and D鈥揇DD

Pros and Cons
鈯� Built-in padding doesn鈥檛 come loose
鈯� Soft, comfortable, breathable
鈯� Can be hard to find a perfect fit

This good-looking, lightly padded sports bra is offered at a steal of a price. We loved how there aren鈥檛 any irritating seams and that the injection-molded padding鈥檚 strategic patterning gave the bra a lightweight, breathable feel. We found the bra dried quickly even after working up a big sweat, which we loved for keeping us from feeling gross underneath our clothes when running errands on the way home from a workout.

The pullover design and lack of a clasp on the backside makes this a great choice for workouts that include mat work, like belly-up core work, Pilates, and yoga moves. And the mesh panel on the back 鈥渁dds breathability without any distractions,鈥� said a tester.

Not only does the built-in padding eliminate the problems of losing a pad in the washing machine or having to uncrumple removable pads every time we put on the bra (truly, the worst), but we found the shape flattering and not excessive. Note that some testers found that the material buckled on the sides鈥攁lthough with so many size options, they thought they could likely find an ideal fit with a different size/cup combination.

Best for Large Chests

Brooks Crossback 2.0

Sizes: 30鈥�40 band, AB鈥揇DE cup

Pros and Cons
鈯� Extremely comfortable
鈯� Molded cups stay put
鈯� Only medium impact for the largest of chests

The Brooks Crossback 2.0 bra is not the absolute most supportive sports bra for large chests during the highest impact activities, but for virtually everything else, we loved its ability to support us comfortably. While most bras intended for bigger chests achieve support by either compressing tightly or encapsulating with stiff materials, zippers, and/or burly fasteners, the Crossback 2.0 utilizes strategic engineering鈥攔einforced materials in the shoulder straps and chest band鈥攁nd a wide range of size options for an almost custom fit. Testers loved how this bra鈥檚 smooth, flat crossback straps didn鈥檛 dig into shoulders and worked great under a backpack, as well as the lack of irritating seams and the soft but effective encapsulation.

鈥淭his works nicely for medium-impact activities without smashing you to death,鈥� said a tester. 鈥淟ove the snug fit of the material, but not snug as in too tight,鈥� said another. 鈥淚 can鈥檛 say enough,鈥� gushed yet another. 鈥淚鈥檓 obsessed with this bra and how this bra performs and that it never chafes me at all.鈥�

Our team wore this bra skiing, hiking, weightlifting, cycling, and running, and only one tester craved more support while running. The bra dries quickly from sweat or after washing and is comfortable during prolonged wear.

Best Adjustable Fit

Tracksmith Allston Adjustable Bra

Sizes: 齿厂鈥揕

Pros and Cons
鈯� Adjustable shoulder straps and chest strap
鈯� Convertible to racerback
鈯� Clip can be felt in racerback mode

This bra is adjustable three ways: the chest band has three clips for dialing size around the ribcage, the shoulder straps are length-adjustable, and the bra can convert to racerback via a clip in the middle of the back, which puts it in high-impact-support mode. The racerback clip can be switched back and forth during one workout. 鈥淚 love the adjustability and the smooth fabric,鈥� said a tester who wore the bra while hiking, biking, and running. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a great bra for someone who might end up wearing a sports bra all day because of logistics, but who wants to ease off the intensity for apr茅s workout.鈥� The Allston Adjustable is made of Tracksmith鈥檚 luxuriously smooth nylon-elastane blend, with interior cups lined with nylon-elastane blend powermesh, which enhances compressive support.

Best for Wearing With a Pack

Oiselle Flyout Bra

Sizes: 2鈥�14

Pros and Cons
鈯� Wide, flat seams remain comfortable under a vest or pack
鈯� Full coverage provides modesty
鈯� Thicker material can feel warm

The Oiselle Flyout Bra has been a favorite among testers for its ability to carry a phone comfortably and securely in the mesh pocket midback. But we also love this bra for its wide, flat shoulder straps that stay comfortable under fully loaded hydration vests and backpacks. We鈥檝e worn this bra for long days on the trail with a hydration vest and have never experienced chafing. The wide chest band and shoulder straps provide ample coverage and combine with compressive fabric for support, even for our large-chested testers. We love that this bra comes in a wide range of sizes, like women鈥檚 dress clothes, so you can find a perfect fit (use the size guide on the Oiselle website to help).

Best for Carrying a Phone on the Run

Rabbit Strappy Pocket Bra

Sizes: 齿厂鈥揦尝

Pros and Cons
鈯� Carries a phone midback
鈯� Cute enough to wear on its own
鈯� Thin shoulder straps can dig in under a pack

The Rabbit Strappy Pocket Bra has become our lead tester鈥檚 go-to for travel. It鈥檚 a simple, good-looking sports bra that carries a phone or hotel key card easily and comfortably, and it packs down small, especially with the pads removed. The bra also stays put while diving into bodies of water (ocean, lake) post-run and dries fairly quickly afterward, ready for the next outing. The thin shoulder straps and lower neckline give the bra a stylish, flattering appeal while still providing support and coverage. The next-to-skin liner, made from a material that uses recycled coffee grounds, feels cool, helps control odor (another travel bonus), and helps the bra dry quickly.

Best Value

Nike Swoosh Medium Support

听

Sizes: 齿齿厂鈥揦齿尝

Pros and Cons
鈯� Fixed cups mean no pads to lose
鈯� Durable, long-lasting comfort
鈯� Pads, if you鈥檙e not a fan of them

One tester has been wearing an earlier version of this sports bra for close to 20 years. 鈥淚t鈥檚 been all over the world while keeping me comfortable running, cycling, hiking, Nordic skiing, etc.,鈥� she says. The simple, pull-on style bra wicks sweat and remains comfortable for hours. The newest version of this do-anything, durable bra comes with light padding built in (no slipping, no losing the padding in the wash), and is made with sustainable, recycled polyester materials. Its $40 price point makes it among the least expensive sports bras out there, and while it鈥檚 classified as 鈥渕edium support,鈥� it can function as high support across a range of activities for smaller chest sizes. It also lasts for-e-ver.

Best Simple Running Bra

Janji Infinity Sports Bra

Sizes: 齿齿厂鈥揦齿齿尝

Pros and Cons
鈯� Reversible
鈯� No clasps on backside
鈯� Doesn鈥檛 dry as quickly as some others

There is something to be said for a simple, no frills sports bra鈥攏o pads, no clasps, just a traditional pullover racerback. The Janji Infiniti Bra is just that, and testers appreciated its 鈥渘o fuss鈥� functionality. The lack of clasps on the back make this a good bra for doing mat work: stretching and exercising on your back after a run, or for activities like yoga and Pilates. One tester said she鈥檚 looking forward to wearing this while on an SUP or even swimming, while another said the full-coverage cut (it effectively covers side-boob, for most) 鈥渋s appropriate for stripping down in front of strangers.鈥�

We love that this bra is reversible. The triple-layer construction of nylon/spandex with a polyester mesh sandwiched between the two color options provided enough compressive support for all but our largest-chested runners. Those three layers also make the bra take a bit longer than other bras to dry from sweat or while air-drying after washing. But for two bras in one, we鈥檒l take it.

How to Choose Sports Bras

When shopping for the best sports bras for you, you need to consider four factors: intended usage, comfort, support, and breathability.

Usage

Are you looking for a bra to wear on its own or under your clothes? Will you be wearing it with a running hydration pack or hiking backpack? Do you want to be able to do yoga, Pilates, or other exercises on your back (and so, don鈥檛 want clasps or hooks back there)? Do you need your bra to carry your phone (or do you always wear a pack or pockets elsewhere)?

Comfort

Comfort is personal. Nothing can replace trying on the bra to ensure it fits your body and the fabric feels good against your skin. Each brand sizes their bras differently, so be sure to try on a range of sizes.

Support

When it comes to support, different categories like 鈥渓ow impact鈥� and 鈥渕edium support鈥� can be confusing because different brands define them in different ways, and the amount of support needed for various activities completely varies by the individual. In general, bras marketed for low-impact activities like yoga, hiking, or cycling will offer less support and technical features than those for high-impact activities, like running or HIIT classes. On the flip side, bras designed to offer higher support may be less breathable and more constricting.

If you have a small cup size, you may find that low- and medium-support bras work perfectly well for high-impact activities, but women with larger cup sizes often need those 鈥渉igh support鈥� bras even for some low-impact activities. Whatever you choose, know that the bra鈥檚 underband鈥攖he most important part for support鈥攕hould fit securely but not so tightly that you can鈥檛 breathe. (Studies have shown that tight sports bras can restrict breathing and affect running performance.) The straps should not dig into your skin or leave red marks when you take the bra off.

Breathability

Too much sweat accumulation on a bra is not only uncomfortable but unhygienic, trapping bacteria on your skin and back. Sport-specific fabric blends鈥攐ften made with polyester, nylon, or merino wool鈥攕hould have strong moisture-wicking properties, and bras made of thinner fabric will allow more heat and perspiration to pass through.

How We Tested

• Number of testers: 11
• Number of bras tested: 22
• Hours working out in test bras: 500
• Toughest testing conditions: Two-plus hours whitewater paddling and then hiking from the bottom of the Grand Canyon to the South Rim while carrying a full backpack full of gear. Close second: Downhill skiing with a toddler.

We wore these bras for running, cycling, cross-country skiing, downhill skiing, yoga, hiking, dog walking, camping, and working at a desk. Every tester wears a different size, ranging from A to DDD cups. If at least two testers agreed that a bra was comfortable and functional, it made our short list. Then we narrowed down the contenders based on functionality for various sports, style, and price.

Meet Our Lead Testers

Lisa Jhung lives and works in Boulder, Colorado, where she writes, edits, and tests gear by doing a variety of outdoor winter sports: running (road, trail, and full-on mountain), Nordic skiing, snowboarding, dog-walking, etc. She also does yoga and lifts weights, sometimes by carrying flagstones around her yard and doing overhead squats and chest presses with a digging bar. She likes to get sh** done while strength training.

The post The Best Sports Bras for Summer 2025 appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

An increasing number of smart, eco-conscious entrepreneurs are putting Earth first by utilizing unwanted materials that would otherwise end up as trash. From trendy tote bags and fanny packs made out of billboard vinyl to casual and recovery footwear made from leftover running shoe midsole scraps, the following four companies are doing their best to keep our planet鈥檚 landfills and oceans from overflowing with trash. In the process, they鈥檙e creating awesome gear.

Rareform Bags

caught my attention by infiltrating my Instagram account. Intrigued, I reached out to the company to learn that while traveling in El Salvador, Alec Avedissian saw locals utilizing the water-resistant, durable material that covers billboards for roofing. Alec and his brother, Aric, launched Rareform in 2013 with a surfboard bag made from discarded billboard material. They鈥檝e since expanded to tote bags, hip packs, and other bags out of brightly colored vinyl that isn鈥檛 traditionally recyclable.

鈥淭he lifespan of a billboard typically is around four to six weeks,鈥� says Alec Avedissian, who also serves as CEO of the company. 鈥淲hen the billboards come down, we then work with our partners to get them shipped to our warehouses in Thousand Oaks, California, and Nashville, Tennessee.鈥�

The company has since kept 700,000 billboards, which amounts to over 30 million pounds of material, out of the landfills by repurposing them as bags.

I鈥檝e been testing the ($80) and love its large capacity, multiple pockets, zippered closure, and waterproof exterior in a one-of-a-kind design for traveling. I can also see myself using this bag for summer adventures as a 鈥渢hrow everything in and figure out what I need on the way to the trailhead鈥� type of bag.

听Trash Gear Co.

Pete Grunwald started collecting discarded plastic 鈥渁s a fun side project鈥� in 2021 while he was working full time as an industrial designer creating protective eyewear for military applications. He鈥檇 break down plastic waste in a blender and use a panini press to mold the pieces into something new: bicycle fenders. He now collects and molds plastic full time with his company听., which continues to make fenders and is soon releasing sunglasses with frames made from repurposed plastic.

鈥淎 big source of my plastic waste is Pak-Techs (plastic can carriers) and I work with beer distributors, breweries, and various stores to collect used ones that customers bring back,鈥� he explains. 鈥淚 have a whole host of smaller sources of plastic as well, much of it coming from friends and community members who are excited by what I’m doing and set aside waste plastic for me.鈥�

After working in the outdoor industry for years, a vendor trip to China opened his eyes to the environmental impacts of traditional manufacturing and, coupled with his knowledge of the massive amount of waste plastic being produced domestically, pushed him toward the Trash Gear concept. 鈥淭hat trip sparked the idea: What if a company could collect local waste and turn it into high quality outdoor gear?鈥� Grunwald says.

While Grunwald says he鈥檚 loved using kitchen tools and figuring things out on the fly, he adds: 鈥淥ne day I hope Trash Gear Co will have a proper manufacturing space and truly be an example of a better way to produce great products.鈥�

I鈥檝e been testing a sample of Trash Gear Co. sunglasses and love their unique frame coloration鈥攖he swirled pattern of the plastic reminds me that they kept something out of the landfills.

Think Blue Surf Bag

Designed to keep your key, key fob, credit card, cash, or anything small completely dry while you surf, SUP, kayak, or play in the water, the听 is made out of aviation life vests that would otherwise end up in a landfill.

Co-founders Marlene Smith and Cathy Chin used to fuel their surfing sessions with Ziploc bags full of cookies鈥攏ot very successfully. They tried making more functional waterproof bags out of various materials before finding a solution in aviation life vests. Smith, who is a private pilot, and her husband, who works in aircraft maintenance, knew that the life vests were discarded after some of their components expired, while the material of the vest itself, having been stored in an airtight bag in the dark, was still as good as new.

鈥淎pproximately 5,000 life vests have been diverted from the landfill into our inventory,鈥� says Smith. 鈥淥f those, so far 2,000 have been converted into The Surf Bag. Every time someone chooses to purchase The Surf Bag over a product made from new plastic, they are making a direct impact on the environment by participating in this diversion.

鈥淢y dream is to ultimately divert all the retired life vests from the landfill into a variety of high-quality waterproof products making it easy for consumers to choose a sustainable product over new plastic products and allowing them to directly contribute to sustainability.鈥�

The small bag lies flat in board shorts pockets and can be connected to a surfboard or SUP leash tie, or to kayak straps or a backpack with a carabiner.

Fleks Footwear

Fleks Footwear founder Leah Larson says the ocean has always been her happy place. 鈥淚 used to go jump in the ocean before high school if I was in a bad mood,鈥� she says. After years in the footwear industry, including a long stint as the VP of Product and Creative Director of Ugg, Larson wanted to find a way to reuse the discarded waste from footwear manufacturing while also solving the wastefulness of flip flops, which become toss-away rubber and plastic. Her love of the ocean inspired her to minimize footwear manufacturing leftovers and discarded beach shoes. She teamed up with a friend and past co-worker, Stuart Jenkins, founder of Blumaka insoles, to launch Fleks Footwear.

Fleks (and Blumaka) grind up footwear manufacturing waste鈥擡TPU scraps left over from the midsole manufacturing process鈥攁nd shape the conglomerate material into slides, clogs, and other casual and recovery footwear. Larson says there鈥檚 enough discarded manufacturing foam waste in the footwear industry to make two and a half billion pairs of midsoles for Fleks shoes. Plus, says Larson, 鈥淭his process uses no solvents and a lot less water than traditional manufacturing.鈥�

I鈥檝e been testing the听, and while they might not be as plush underfoot as my son鈥檚 Yeezy Slides that I occasionally steal, I love how my feet stay put on the footbed. Larson chalks that up to the tiny bits of repurposed foam that morph around the foot.

I also love the flecked rubber; it reminds me that my slides kept discarded waste out of the landfills and the ocean, which, like Larson, I鈥檇 like to keep healthy. (Larson and I graduated together from the same San Diego high school and used to jump into the same stretch of ocean before classes started.)

The post This Great Gear is Made Out of Trash appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

More and more athletes have been tapping into THC/CBD products to try to enhance their performance, feel less pain while training or competing, or aid their recovery from workouts, which includes improving their sleep.

The use of THC鈥攖he primary psychoactive compound from the cannabis plant鈥攆or recreational purposes is currently legal in 24 states (medical use is legal in 39 states), with some states only allowing hemp-derived forms of THC. A by the University of Colorado at Boulder found little evidence of performance-enhancing effects of THC for athletes, but significant evidence that participants had greater enjoyment during and after their workouts.

To find out for myself how THC affects workouts, for the past couple of months, I鈥檝e been testing a range of hemp-derived THC/CBD mints called AthleTHC that are meant to support athletes of all kinds.

AthleTHC hit the scene in December听 2024. Two Brazilian Jiu Jitsu athletes鈥攁 power lifter and an ex-Navy Seal鈥攚ho鈥檇 found success with their Kill Cliff CBD products, created three formulas of THC-based mints. Each one is blended with non-psychoactive CBD, CBG, CBC, and/or THCV, which are all derivatives from the cannabis plant with different effects.

Here鈥檚 how , Rebound, Flow, and Power, have worked for me over the past months.

Rebound: THC (2mg), CBD, CBC

I鈥檝e taken the Rebound formula mostly in the evenings after snowboarding or running, or on evenings when other people might have a beer after work or wine with dinner. It makes me feel relaxed, content, and less easily annoyed. I sleep better. I say amusing (to me, anyway) things while watching TV. If I have a nagging pain of any sort, it takes the edge off. I either feel my pain less, or think I feel my pain less. Or don鈥檛 care as much that I have pain. However, whenever I pop one, I鈥檓 maybe a little鈥攚hat was I going to say?鈥� inconsequentially forgetful.

WHY: Two milligrams of THC is considered a micro-dose, but since individual tolerances vary, it may be a regular or even mega-dose. THC is straight-up weed (hence, my feelings of amusement post-mint). is known to relax, reduce pain caused by inflammation, lower anxiety, and treat sleep and even seizure disorders. Studies suggest that the addition of CBD to this mint, and the other two (as well as to any other edible with THC), either of THC or . In my anecdotal studies, I鈥檝e found CBD to generally mellow out THC. Like CBD, is non-psychoactive. It鈥檚 been studied for its therapeutic potential as anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anticonvulsant, anti-depressant, and pain-blocker.

Flow: THC (2mg), CBD, CBG

I鈥檝e tested the Flow formula a few times while snowboarding. (It is called 鈥淔low,鈥� after all.) I鈥檝e also used it once while running (from home; I did not drive). I鈥檝e found it, indeed, makes my activity feel flowy鈥攕mooth snowboarding turns (in my head or in reality, tbd), and focused foot placement on rocky trails (I didn鈥檛 trip and felt in flow). It makes putting away laundry less tedious. It makes puttering around doing yardwork a happy and effective activity instead of a chore. It makes sitting down to work on things I find boring feel pleasant. This one also helps me sleep. The Flow mint might be my favorite of the three.

WHY: The formulation of the Rebound mint and the Flow mint are similar鈥攂oth have THC and CBD鈥攂ut the addition of CBG rather than CBC creates a different effect鈥hough it鈥檚 possible that this is in my head. Like CBD, is non-psychotic. Current studies reveal that CBG has therapeutic effects of reducing inflammation, protecting the central nervous system,听 managing pain, helping metabolic syndrome, and even aiding cancer treatment. It can also be used as an antibacterial. CBG has been shown to work like acetaminophen by inhibiting the same enzyme.

Power: THC (2mg), CBD, THCV

The Power formula has scared me. For one thing, the thought of 鈥淧ower鈥� edibles of any sort leads me to believe that听 I鈥檒l go into a weightlifting rage and pull a muscle. Or I鈥檒l run too intensely up my local hill and yell at the top of my lungs from the summit. Even the color is intimidating: while the Rebound mint is white with a cool mint flavor, and the Flow mint is green and spearmint, Power is cinnamon red. Red means rage.

But, in the pursuit of science and journalism, I did it. I popped one and headed out my door for an afternoon run. I may have thought a downed yard waste bag was a lion for a millisecond. I also may have seen faces carved into trees that weren鈥檛 there, and considered adding two miles to the end of my run for fun until my nagging calf brought me back to reality.

According the AthleTHC, the Power mint is 鈥渕eant to increase energy and support focus鈥� and provide a 鈥漨ore stimulating experience.鈥� Did the THC enhance my performance? I鈥檓 not sure; I ran pretty slowly. Did it hinder it? No. I found myself a little dizzy before I headed out the door. While on the run, I felt okay, albeit, a little crazy.

WHY: I am not sure why I felt slightly hallucinogenic on my run, as the third ingredient in this mix, , lacks the psychoactive properties of THC. Along with decreasing appetite, THCV is known to increase metabolism, which increases energy. Maybe that鈥檚 why I felt a touch crazy. It鈥檚 possible that it was the THC, I hadn鈥檛 eaten much, and I knew I had THC in my system and so my brain was open to things it wouldn鈥檛 be otherwise. THC has been known to elevate heart rates; that鈥檚 why it鈥檚 no longer a banned substance in . I have not gauged my heart rate after ingesting a POWER mint. Perhaps I need more research.

THC for Athletes: Promising, but More Testing Needed

I appreciated that AthleTHC mints come in little tins that make them inconspicuous and easy to carry, although the cover says 鈥淎thleTHC鈥�. But then again, do we need to hide the name of products like these, in the wellness category and aimed at athletes? People drink beer. People do all sorts of things鈥攃razier than microdosing marijuana鈥攖hat are socially and legally accepted.

With more and more THC/CBD products on the market, maybe micro-dosing for athletics (or, any reason) will become more normalized. But like drinking alcohol and other normalized habits of adults, THC usage comes with .

One downside I听 experienced: Twice after weekends of testing, I鈥檝e found Monday and Tuesday to be particularly annoying. Life stresses tend to get to me more than usual. According to , 鈥渨ithdrawal鈥� symptoms can include everything from irritability to changes in mood. I don鈥檛 think my experiment got me to the point of addiction, but I can easily imagine how taking something that makes you feel good can become addictive: You want to feel good again.

That said, I found that microdosing mints, used responsibly, appear to have the ability to help athletes recover with relaxation and improved sleep, find flow in activities, and improve mood. It might even enhance power lifting or high-intensity workouts (if hallucinations don鈥檛 get in the way). All things in moderation, and like any substance that鈥檚 only legal to those over 21, I鈥檓 keeping these things hidden from the developing brains of my children while sharing with my adult friends.

In conclusion, while significant data has been collected in this study, findings are somewhat inconclusive and could benefit from future testing.

The post I Tested THC Formulated for Athletes. Here鈥檚 What I Experienced. appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

Hydration vests have become the preferred method of carrying fluids for most runners, and you can find over 25 different options on the market this season. We tested them all. Vests carry liquids and supplies comfortably by distributing the weight evenly across your chest and upper back; the best ones become part of your body, fitting close to your torso and sloshing minimally. After months of testing, these picks stood out for their comfort and performance.

Update, April 2025: We replaced five vests with new highly-rated models from The North Face, Nathan Sports, Osprey, Patagonia, and REI Co-op.

At a Glance

• Best for Ultramarathons:
• Best for Hot Weather:
• Best of Hut Trips and Multi-day 国产吃瓜黑料s:
• Best for Short Runs:
• Best Pack with a Bladder: /
• Best for Mountain Runs:
• Best Value:
• How to Choose a Hydration Vest
• How We Test
• Meet Our Lead Tester

Best for Ultramarathons

Salomon ADV Skin 12

Weight: 11.3 oz (with two included 500 ml flasks)
Sizing: XS-XL
Capacity: 12L

Pros and Cons
鈯� Well-thought-out gear organizing pockets
鈯� Customizable fit
鈯� Lacks a dedicated outlet for a hydration hose to thread smoothly to the front side

This vest is a perennial favorite due to its adaptable fit, carrying capacity, organization, and comfort over the long run. This season, it received some welcome updates that optimize fit and minimize bounce, including new shoulder straps and a new Y-shaped construction made with a mix of stretchy and supportive materials. Plus, it comes with new conical-shaped hydration flasks that slide easily in and out of the sleeves on the front shoulder straps.

One tester wore the ADV Skin 12 for 42 hours during a 100-mile race in the Swiss Alps on what she says was 鈥渧ery technical鈥� terrain (we鈥檙e betting that鈥檚 an understatement), and reported that, 鈥淭he pack held up fantastically.鈥� She raved about the back storage that holds plenty of layers for the long haul and how well the front pockets carry water bottle flasks. 鈥淭his pack is so lightweight and doesn鈥檛 jostle at all,鈥� she said.

The other front pockets are plentiful enough to keep a phone, food, and miscellaneous items separate and organized. Paired with Salomon鈥檚 Custom Quiver Pole Sleeve ($30), which carries collapsible poles like Robin Hood鈥檚 arrows, this pack is ready for battle.

The ADV Skin 12 can fit everything you need for a triple-digit run, yet one tester also noted that the vest 鈥渨asn鈥檛 cumbersome for a six-mile run where I wasn鈥檛 carrying much.鈥�

Best for Hot Weather

The North Face Summit Series Run Vest 5

Weight: 8.6 oz (with two included 500 ml flasks)
Sizing: XS-XL
Capacity: 5L

Pros and Cons
鈯�Extremely lightweight
鈯�Very breathable
鈯� Flasks can be tricky to access while moving

When it鈥檚 so hot that the last thing you want to do is put on a pack, that鈥檚 when you know you really need one. But you can ease the discomfort by wearing one that is ultra-light, airy, and doesn鈥檛 hold sweat. The North Face Summit Series Run Vest 5 weighs just 8.6 ounces with the two included 500 ml (17-ounce) soft flasks it carries in the chest pockets. The pack is made out of nylon/elastane mesh that doesn鈥檛 retain moisture and vents air like a screen door. One tester called the back panel 鈥渆xceptionally breathable,鈥� despite shedding copious amounts of sweat.

We liked that this pack鈥檚 tension cords are simple and easy to adjust for a fit that is so dialed-in, one tester exclaimed, 鈥淚t’s easy to forget you’ve got this on at times.鈥� Until, of course, she needed to access her fluids or phone, and then remembered the vest and was grateful to have it.

The hydration flasks, which come with the pack, are easy to fill and clean thanks to their wide openings. We could drink from the flasks easily without taking them out of their pockets. We found, however, that getting them in and out of the pocket on the fly requires a little extra effort, especially while carrying a phone in the zippered pocket, as the flasks tend to sink low in the compartments despite the tension cords.

Overall, we liked the pocketing and feel of this lightweight pack that, one tester said, carries 鈥減retty much all you could need for most shorter trail adventures.鈥�

Best for Multi-day 国产吃瓜黑料s

Black Diamond Distance 15L Pack

Weight: 12.5 oz
Sizing: S-L (men鈥檚); S-L (women鈥檚)
Capacity: 15L

Pros and Cons
鈯� Carries a ton of gear comfortably
鈯� Comes in men鈥檚- and women鈥檚-specific fits
鈯� Doesn鈥檛 come with soft flasks or bladder

Thanks to its roomy capacity in the main compartment plus ample pocketing, the Black Diamond 15L carries a decent amount of gear comfortably and with minimal sloshing, making it a great pack for adventures of all sorts. Thoughtfully-designed storage鈥攁 cinch-pull main compartment, seven exterior pockets and one of them zippered, an interior zippered pocket, and dedicated loops for trekking poles and ice axes鈥攎akes this an extremely livable pack.

We love the cinch cords that trim the sides and reduce or expand the pack volume to secure whatever amount we鈥檙e carrying in the most compact bag possible. We also love the materials: soft, breathable mesh back paneling and shoulder straps, stretchy mesh pocketing, and durable ripstop nylon on the body of the bag.

Female testers also raved at how the pack fit their bodies, calling out the stretchy lower sternum strap, adjustable placement of both sternum straps, and shape and placement of the shoulder straps. 鈥淚t’s really easy to fit the pack to the contours of your body using its harness system,鈥� said one.

While it doesn鈥檛 come with a bladder or flasks, the bag can hold either鈥攐r both鈥攃omfortably, making it a great choice when your adventure calls for ample fluids.

Best for Short Runs

Nathan Sports Pinnacle Featherlite 1.5 Liter Hydration Vest

Weight: 5.5 oz (with included soft flask)
Sizing: XXS/XS-XXL
Capacity: 1.5L

Pros and Cons
鈯� Simple and comfortable for short runs
鈯� Extremely lightweight
鈯� Short zipper to back pocket makes using pocket difficult
鈯� Adjustment sliders on the front of the pack can cause some discomfort

Due to its simple, lightweight structure and ability to comfortably carry a flask or two, a phone, and other necessities without weighing you down, this is a good pack to leave in the car or by the front door, ready to grab whenever you just need a way to carry small items while running. We grabbed it often for short jaunts and liked its small, unobtrusive size.

The one 14-ounce flask that comes with the vest sits comfortably in one of four pockets on the shoulder straps (they can accommodate bottles and flasks up to 20 ounces). We used the other pockets for a phone, car key, dog poop bag, and dog leash. The back pocket, which offers 1.5L of storage, is large enough for a lightweight shell, or gloves and a hat, but the short (4 inches) zippered opening makes using the pocket a slight hassle.

Still, this is an efficient, breathable pack made of comfortable, stretchy mesh that secures to the body with two easy-to-use chest straps. 鈥淚 love the way it hugs your body and does not move,鈥� said a tester.

Best Pack With a Bladder

Osprey Dyna 1.5/Duro 1.5

Weight: 12.4鈥�14.8 oz depending on size and gender
Sizing: S-L (women鈥檚 Dyna); S-L (men鈥檚 Duro)
Capacity: 1.5L

Pros and Cons
鈯� Insulated hose
鈯� Made with 100 percent recycled materials
鈯� Materials feel somewhat scratchy

This pack comes with a quality 1.5L hydration bladder and an insulated hose that keeps water cool in hot weather and prevents water from freezing in the cold. It is smartly routed from the bladder pocket to the front, which testers appreciated enough to call it out as the best bladder system in the test group.

We were also impressed with the fit of these gender-specific packs. 鈥淚t’s easy to adjust and get fitted to the shape/contours of your body,鈥� said a female tester. 鈥淚t was lightweight and felt like part of my shirt,鈥� said another.

The breathability of the back paneling also stood out even when we were sweating heavily. We found, however, that the all-recycled materials felt a bit stiff and scratchy, but we will take the trade off in favor of Mother Earth.

One knock: The upper shoulder strap pockets are unusually high, making it somewhat tricky to access them on the run.

Best for Mountain Running

Patagonia Slope Runner Vest

Weight: 6.9 oz
Sizing: XS-L
Capacity: 4听L

Pros and Cons
鈯� Two flasks included
鈯� Great pass-through pocket
鈯� Lack of large main compartment can limit carrying capacity

The Slope Runner Vest was our go-to choice for mountain running, mostly because it is constructed out of breathable, lightweight materials with a Durable Water Repellent (DWR) finish that repels precipitation that comes with higher altitudes. We also love that it breathes Patagonia ethos: it鈥檚 Fair Trade-Certified and made without PFAS/man-made chemicals).

The pack also carries flasks and/or a hydration bladder鈥攕ecurely and conveniently. The two included 500 milliliter flasks sit comfortably in deep mesh chest pockets, and a simple clip effectively holds a hydration bladder, when added. Six stretchy mesh pockets on the chest and waist straps are easy to access mid-run. The pass-through pocket on the backside proved a great place for a layer to be shoved through and accessed via either side. And the small zippered pocket at the top of the backside fits essentials like First Aid items (but nothing that big or bulky, like larger winter traction devices).

With a tester-approved, lightweight, simple corded system that secures the pack to the body, this is an overall comfortable pack, ready for adventure.

Paid Advertisement by Backcountry.com

Ultimate Direction Xodus Hydration Vesta

For all-day mountain runs and race efforts where every detail matters, the Ultimate Direction Xodus Vesta delivers streamlined support, bounce-free storage, and dialed-in comfort. Its 6.5-liter capacity fits hydration, nutrition, and backup layers, while seven front pockets provide fast access to fuel and essentials. Customize your fit with a full-length zip closure and adjustable chest cinch system, plus stash away poles with the trekking pole loops and stay visible with reflective details.

Best Value

REI Co-op Swiftland 5 Hydration Vest

Weight: 9 oz
Sizing: XS-2X-3X
Capacity: 5L

Pros and Cons
鈯� 1.5L bladder included at bargain price
鈯� Good routing system for hydration hose
鈯� Fit isn鈥檛 as streamlined as some packs

A hundred-dollar hydration pack that comes with a reservoir is a great value. The REI Swiftland 5鈥檚 1.5-liter HydraPak Elite reservoir fits easily and seamlessly into the main compartment of the pack and stays put with a simple clip. The hose then routes, on either the right or left side, through a loop and two-clip system that keeps it secure, and your liquids easily accessible.

Chest pockets hold soft flasks (not included), should that be your hydration preference or if you need additional liquids. A zippered pocket securely holds a phone while a second mesh pocket on the front and a large one on the back add storage options.

The bulk of this pack sits in the center of the back, making the fit not as streamlined and close-to-body as some other packs. And the materials, while breathable, aren鈥檛 as soft as some (though we applaud the use of bluesign-approved recycled nylon). But as the least expensive option with easy adjustment straps and crossover capability to other activities like mountain biking and hiking, the REI Swiftland 5 Hydration Vest is a great choice.

How to Choose a Hydration Vest

Fit

The best way to shop for a pack is to read our reviews and then try on some options, making sure your final choice is comfortable and fits your specific body. If you can shop in person, assess how the chest straps sit on your body, and if there are any points of irritation. See if you can adjust all the straps to get the pack nice and snug to your body, and jog around to make sure the pack doesn鈥檛 move too much.

Size

Since sizes vary between brands, start by checking the brand鈥檚 measurement guide on their website, and then measure yourself. The vest should feel snug, but not restrictive. If it鈥檚 hard to take a full breath without battling the straps, it鈥檚 too small. If there are gaps in the fabric around the shoulders and the pack moves too much on your back when you run, it鈥檚 likely too big. If you are maxing out the straps in either direction鈥攃inched all the way in, or fully expanded鈥攃onsider shifting sizes.

After all of these steps, if you鈥檙e still having trouble finding packs that fit properly, try a different style. If men鈥檚 packs aren鈥檛 fitting right, try a unisex or women鈥檚-specific model and see if that helps. Women鈥檚 packs typically have more room around the bust, are narrower in the shoulders, and are shorter overall. For the final test, load up the pack (at the very least with a full flask) and see how it feels with a little bit of weight.

Preferences and Intended Use

The final consideration comes down to personal preferences and how you plan to use the vest. Some people, for example, demand a zippered front pocket, or pole storage, or large pockets capable of holding many easy-to-access snacks. Make sure the pack meets your specific needs: You鈥檒l likely need a different pack for short runs around the neighborhood than for full-day (or multi-day) adventures.

How We Test

• Number of testers: 6
• Number of products tested: 26
• Gnarliest test conditions: A 100-mile ultramarathon through the Swiss Alps
• Most common testing grounds: Trails along the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains

Most of our testing took place in Boulder, Colorado, and on trails deeper into the Rocky Mountains. Our test team included six women, each of whom tested mostly apples-to-apples packs: small volume, medium volume, or large volume, while one tester put every pack through the paces.

Meet Our Lead Tester

Lisa Jhung has been running in hydration packs for roughly 25 years, since she traipsed through the wilds of places like Morocco and Switzerland as part of multi-day adventure racing teams. In more tame periods of her life, like now, she regularly throws on a pack to hit the trails of Boulder, Colorado, and the high-alpine routes in the Indian Peaks of the Rocky Mountains with girlfriends or sometimes, her dog Lulu. Lisa is also the lead tester and writer of our women鈥檚 running apparel and sports bra categories, and co-leads our running shoe tests.

The post The Best Running Hydration Vests for Every Type of Run appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

Trail running shoes are like adventure partners: find a good one, and you feel safe, confident, and excited to explore all sorts of terrain. We put the season鈥檚 offerings to the test on every kind of topography, from Rocky Mountain singletrack to Santa Barbara bluffs, Nebraska gravel backroads, and the rocky, rooty maze of the Appalachian Trail. Our team scrutinized every model鈥檚 fit, traction, and ride, and selected the winners for their ability to confidently and comfortably take us where we want to go, time and again.

Update April 2025: We鈥檝e tested and selected new models in nine categories, including a new best all-around pick of the Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide. We are continually testing and will be updating this list of best trail running shoes throughout the year as new models impress our testers and editors.

At a Glance

• Best All-Around: Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide ($250)
• Runner-Up All-Around: La Sportiva Prodigio Pro ($195)
• Best Trail Super Shoe: Adidas Agravic Speed Ultra ($220)
• Best for Ultrarunning: Hoka Tecton X 3 ($275)
• Best Daily Workhorse: Scarpa Spin Ultra 2 ($179)
• Best Value: Saucony Peregrine 15 ($140)
• Best Zero Drop: Altra Lone Peak 9 ($140)
• Best for Speedy Scrambles: Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 Matryx ($112)
• Best for Soft Terrain: Scarpa Spin ST ($179)
• Best for Groomed Trails/Gravel: The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 ($160)
• Best Road-to-Trail: Nike Pegasus Trail 5 ($140)
• Best Max Cushioned: Brooks Caldera 8 ($150)
• Most Natural Ride: Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4 ($150)
• Best for Beginner Trail Runners: New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro v9 ($155)
• How to Choose a Trail Running Shoe
• How We Test
• Meet Our Lead Testers

Best All-Around

Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide

Weight: 10.2 oz (unisex)
Stack Height: 41鈥�35 mm
Drop: 6 mm
Sizing: 4.5-13, 14 (men鈥檚), 5.5-14, 15 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Unmatched combo of comfort and trail performance
鈯� Quick-feeling for such a cushioned shoe
鈯� Outstanding grip
鈯� Quicklace system is difficult to adjust

Thick soles typically feel unstable on rocky, rooty trails, sloped surfaces, or sharp descents. But the Salomon S/Lab Ultra Glide defies expectations, delivering a surprising blend of cushioning, stability, and responsiveness. 鈥淚’m always a little wary of big-stack trail shoes because some of them feel mushy and slow, or even worse, unstable,鈥� said one tester. 鈥淭hese were none of those. I felt like I nestled right into the soles and bounced right along.鈥�

Aesthetically, the S/Lab Ultra Glide looks like no other. The funky-looking wavy midsole with ankle-deep sidewalls combines a chassis of firmer EVA for stability with a softer, bouncier PEBA/EVA core underfoot. The outsole molds to the wavy midsole, creating circular indents across the bottom of the foot, designed to defuse impact. The combination works: the shoe delivered a soft, responsive, and adaptable ride that morphed over uneven terrain. On the open trail, the four-millimeter lugs proved reliable, biting into packed dirt and loose gravel with ease.

鈥淭he shoe provided a smooth, supported run on a variety of terrains,鈥� noted one tester, who was surprised that even when the footing got rocky, the S/Lab Ultra Glide 鈥渄elivered a commanding performance, allowing for precise, responsive running.鈥�

The soft but strong engineered mesh upper molded and moved with the contours of the foot, while providing a slight stretch for added toe box room. The gusseted tongue snugged our insteps nicely, but Salomon鈥檚 signature Quicklace system takes some adjusting each time you lace up to get the proper amount of pressure鈥攏ot a dealbreaker, but not quite an effortless 鈥渟et it and forget it鈥� experience.

Once dialed in, however, the fit and ride topped every shoe in this year鈥檚 test selection, making them the shoes we always seemed to reach for.

Runner-Up All-Around

La Sportiva Prodigio Pro

Weight: 8.9 oz, 7.9 oz
Stack height: 34鈥�28 mm
Drop: 6 mm
Sizes: 7.5-15.5 (men鈥檚), 5.5-11 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Lively midsole that still allows ground feel
鈯� Great traction
鈯� Some pressure on the top of the foot

The Prodigio Pro runs unlike any other La Sportiva shoe we鈥檝e ever tested. We鈥檝e enjoyed many from the brand, known for its nimble, rugged trail models. But this one is the softest to date and delivers a remarkably lively, fun ride. The midsole鈥攁 core of bouncy, nitrogen-infused TPU surrounded by a more stable, nitrogen-infused EVA cage鈥攆eels snappy underfoot. 鈥淵our foot just pops off the ground with each step,鈥� said one tester.

The bootie construction鈥攁 sock-like, engineered mesh upper encircling the ankle鈥攕uccessfully kept trail debris from sneaking inside the shoe. The durable upper, made from a mix of polyester, TPU, and nylon threads that the brand is calling 鈥淧ower Wire鈥� mesh worked in conjunction with the secure midfoot wrap to hold our feet securely and comfortably. One knock on the upper: The tongue, with an interesting, tubular padding, caused a little irritation on the top of the foot beneath the laces for some testers. Most, however, found it a comfortable upper overall, one that was a pleasure to pull on.

Underfoot, a Frixion outsole with multidirectional, four-millimeter lugs did a fantastic job at gripping all surfaces. 鈥淭his shoe has great traction in mud, slush, dirt, rocks, and roots,鈥� said one tester, who noted that the shoe performs expertly on off-camber terrain. 鈥淭his shoe makes me feel more nimble and quick than most shoes do.鈥�

Best Trail Super Shoe

Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed Ultra

Weight: 9.5 oz (men鈥檚), 8.1 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 38鈥�30 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Sizing: 6-13, 14 (men鈥檚), 5-11 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Fast, smooth, and lively ride
鈯� Adaptive stability
鈯� Not great in really rocky terrain

Every Agravic Speed Ultra tester was in awe of how easily faster paces felt while wearing this shoe. 鈥淚 consistently ran about 30 seconds per mile faster while running in these shoes than what the effort felt like,鈥� said a masters tester. Adidas designers skillfully adapted the elements of a road super shoe to create a similar, effort-reducing, propulsive feel in a shoe that works on the uncertain terrain of the trail.

Underfoot, the main ingredients are a bouncy-but-not-too-soft gas-infused TPEE-based midsole working harmoniously with an embedded, trail-specific 鈥減late.鈥� Instead of a solid, rigid plate, Adidas uses semi-flexible rods that react independently to variations in the terrain. Made of PEBA in its hard plastic form as often found in track spike plates, the four prongs in the forefoot and two in the heel are splayed wider and closer to the edges than those in Adidas鈥檚 road shoes, to enhance stability. One tester said the resulting ride 鈥減rovided a lively pop without being tippy on variable surfaces or prescribing a set, rigid roll.鈥�

Deep sculpted side walls surround a beveled heel, delivering smooth, secure landings, and a narrow midfoot waist widens to a generous, flared forefoot, providing an agile and stable stance. The aggressively rockered geometry from heel to toe delivers what one tester described as 鈥渁 balanced ride that makes it easy to stay forward on my feet and drive backward with each stride, creating a quick, powerful push-off.鈥�

For the outsole, Adidas uses the same trustworthy, grippy Continental rubber found on most of the brand鈥檚 running shoes. This trail-specific version features variable 2.5- to 3-millimeter lugs for surefooted, no-stress traction. As one might expect in a high-level racing shoe, the upper is kept to a minimum for weight reduction. Made with a non-stretch, breathable, quick-drying, woven material, we found it offered a secure, snug lockdown while providing a touch of abrasion protection.

Given the tall stack height, testers had to cautiously check their foot placements through technical rocky terrain. But wherever the terrain smoothed out and allowed for full strides, the Agravic Speed Ultra came alive and delivered a ride that testers said felt like flying. If you鈥檝e been holding out for a plated trail racing shoe that gets almost everything right, the wait is over.

Read our full review of the Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed Ultra.

Best for Ultrarunning

Hoka Tecton X 3

Weight: 10 oz (men鈥檚), 7.9 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 40鈥�35mm (men鈥檚); 39鈥�34mm (women鈥檚)
Drop: 5 mm
Sizes: Men鈥檚 7-14, Women鈥檚 5-11

Pros and Cons
鈯� Gaiter keeps out trail debris
鈯� Excellent balance of comfort and responsiveness
鈯� Doesn鈥檛 feel tippy, despite carbon fiber plates
鈯� Pricey

This third iteration of Hoka’s Tecton X is the best yet (and we鈥檝e loved them all, awarding the debut model Gear of the Year in 2022). Like the first two, the Tecton X 3 features two carbon fiber plates within each shoe that sit parallel to each other, allowing them to move independently. This enables the shoe to morph over rocks and roots instead of tipping the foot, a sensation we鈥檝e felt in some trail running shoes that utilize one large plate. The two plates in the Tecton X 3 are slightly wider than those in version 2 and feature a winged shape under the heel that鈥檚 meant to add to the shoe鈥檚 stability on technical terrain.

Other updates include a softer layer of PEBA foam above the plate and directly beneath the foot which testers reported enhances the joint-comforting cushion over long, rugged runs. The bottom layer of foam remains firmly responsive for a tactile ground feel.

And then there鈥檚 the unique upper. While some testers were skeptical of having a gaiter built into the shoe, it proved not only comfortable but also highly effective. A tester who worried the material around the ankle would annoy her reported, 鈥淭he gaiter is stretchy and adds to the overall comfort and techy feel.鈥� Every tester appreciated how the built-in gaiter kept debris out of the shoes with zero irritation or awkward clips. The Matryx upper, made of high-strength synthetic yarns, was stretchy enough for easy on-and-offs and to move with the foot, while also doing a great job holding feet in place over wild terrain. Its also highly breathable: 鈥淚 ran straight through a river, and the shoe dried out very quickly,鈥� said a Boulder, Colorado-based tester.

The entire package鈥攖wo layers of foam, four-millimeter Vibram Magagrip lugs, carbon-fiber plating, and a gaiter鈥攃omes in at minimal weight for such a rugged and feature-rich ride. 鈥淭his thing is light, especially for a trail shoe,鈥� marveled a female tester, adding, 鈥淚t鈥檚 absolutely speed-inspiring.鈥� The Tecton X 3 is our pick for ultra-runners and regular folks looking for a great shoe that can tackle the most mountainous terrain in comfort.

Best Daily Workhorse

Scarpa Spin Ultra 2

Weight: 10.2 oz (men), 8.8 oz (women)
Stack Height: 28鈥�24 mm
Drop: 4 mm
Sizing: EU 40-47, 48 (men鈥檚), EU 36-43 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Durable outsole, midsole, and upper construction
鈯� Nimble and cushioned ride
鈯� Runs narrow

When the Scarpa Spin Ultra first came out in 2019, it impressed our crew so much that we named it the Gear of the Year. It embodied everything we looked for in a trail running shoe鈥攁 secure yet comfortable fit, a protective midsole with dependable cushioning, and an outsole with outstanding traction. Six years later, Scarpa has completely updated this award-winning model, retaining those award-winning characteristics while making it tougher than ever.

The most notable update is Scarpa鈥檚 debut use of Supercritical TPEE foam. This high-tech midsole material is created by injecting a gas into the foam and exposing it to extreme pressure and heat, creating bubbles that make the foam light and bouncy. While the Scarpa midsole is not as soft and trampoline-like as some of the supercritical foams we鈥檝e tested, its firmer nature provides impressive durability, stability, and quick underfoot responsiveness. One tester described the shoe as a 鈥渧ery stable, rugged trail runner, with minimal flex.鈥� Another said, 鈥淭he midsole cushions just enough to dampen impact without dulling the feel for and engagement with the trail, enhancing nimble footplants and springy toe-offs.鈥�

Like a lot of European-made shoes, testers found the Spin Ultra 2 to fit rather tight, especially in the toe box. Once laced up, the recycled mesh upper with bio-based TPU print overlays doesn鈥檛 have much give, locking your foot securely in place. While it enhances stability on technical terrain, it may feel restrictive for runners who prefer a bit more wiggle room.

If you鈥檙e after an easygoing, plush shoe, this isn鈥檛 it. But if you prefer a firmly-responsive stance and stable ride that can get beat to hell and keep going, these are for you.

Best Value

Saucony Peregrine 15

Weight: 9.7 oz (men鈥檚), 8.6 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack height: 28鈥�24 mm
Drop: 4 mm
SIZES: 7-13, 14, 15 (men鈥檚); 5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Performance features at a reasonable price
鈯� Light, flexible, and nimble ride
鈯� Deep outsole lugs
鈯� Forefoot cushioning can feel slight on long runs

In an era that鈥檚 serving up increasingly fat midsoles, we鈥檙e happy to see that Saucony鈥檚 longtime performer remains relatively low to the ground, making it flexible and connected to the trail. It doesn鈥檛, however, run too firm. The reformulated EVA-based midsole with a premium, bouncy TPU-based insole feels soft underfoot and is plentiful enough to cushion the impact even on hard rocks and packed dirt.

The Peregrine 15鈥檚 outsole features aggressive, widely spaced, five-millimeter-deep, chevron-shaped lugs made of Saucony鈥檚 proprietary rubber compound. The bite gives the Peregrine secure traction on soft terrain, like loamy soil and fresh snow. Due to its low profile, secure-fitting upper, and light weight, the shoe also feels nimble on rocky, technical terrain. That upper is a simple, flexible-but-rugged mesh with a gusseted tongue and midfoot straps that tie into the laces, keeping the foot snugly in place.

鈥淭hese kept me stable while running on both singletrack and wider fireroad trails, and I felt fast because they鈥檙e so lightweight,鈥� said a tester. Another raved, 鈥淲ith the light and flexible feel of a toothy racing flat, the Peregrine always inspires me to pick up the pace and fly, but I never feel beat up in them no matter how far I go.鈥�

For a shoe that can tackle all sorts of off-road adventures comfortably and capably, $140 is a steal.

Best Zero Drop

Altra Lone Peak 9

Weight: 11.1 oz (men), 9.3 oz (women)
Stack Height: 25鈥�25 mm
Drop: 0 mm
Sizing: 7 – 13, 14, 15, 16 (men鈥檚), 5.5 – 12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Retains the best qualities of Lone Peak 8
鈯� Outstanding traction and grip
鈯� New protective toe bumper reduces flexibility in the toe box

鈥淚f it ain鈥檛 broke, don鈥檛 fix it鈥� has been Altra’s motto regarding their flagship trail shoe for years. The Lone Peak 9 stays true to its roots, maintaining the zero-drop platform, wide toe box, and reliable grip, with a few minor updates, including a re-engineered upper, improved outsole, and lighter midsole.

The midsole is still made of Altra EGO foam, but the compound has been reformulated to weigh less and have more resilient compression, so it should last longer. Testers found the changes minimal, with the shoe maintaining its signature flexibility and excellent ground feel.

The upper, which received the lion’s share of updates, features 100 percent recycled ripstop mesh with no-sew overlays. A new protective toe bumper wraps up and extends over the top of the toe box in the front and along the sides. One tester with toe arthritis dinged the new bumper for reducing the flexibility in the toe box, but no other tester noted a problem. One small but clever addition is an additional set of eyelets, spaced farther apart, that allows the option of creating a tighter midfoot hold for those with low-volume feet.

Underfoot, Altra continues to use their proprietary MaxTrac outsole with 3.5-millimeter lugs but increased the rubber coverage for this version. One tester who slogged through the wet, snowy Wisconsin winter described the outsole as 鈥渢op-notch.鈥� The heel rudder that extends out the back has been split, improving stability by reducing lateral torque. (Note, a version 9+ was recently released that is identical except for a Vibram Megagrip outsole and a new ripstop mesh).

Bottom line: If you鈥檙e a Lone Peak fan there鈥檚 nothing new here that will jeopardize that. Slight improvements sharpen the ride without altering the shoe鈥檚 core identity. 鈥淭he Lone Peak鈥檚 strengths haven’t changed for me,鈥� said one longtime Lone Peak fan.

Best For Speedy Scrambles

Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 Matryx

Weight: 8.3 oz (men鈥檚), 6.9 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 23.5鈥�19.5 mm
Drop: 4 mm
Sizing: 7-15 (men鈥檚), 5-11 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Lightweight, low-profile
鈯� Secure foothold
鈯� Nimble over rough terrain
鈯� Cushioning can feel slight under toes

If you鈥檙e in need of an amazingly agile shoe to scale mountain trails like a bighorn sheep, the Long Sky 2 Matryx is here for it. The new upper, made out of Matryx鈥攁 thin, breathable, quick-drying synthetic fabric reinforced with super-durable Kevlar threads鈥攕ecures the foot, with a half-booty tongue adding extra hold. Cutouts in the Vibram Megagrip outsole save weight between the tacky, grippy-rubber, five-millimeter lugs. The flexible, compression-molded EVA midsole is on the slight end, enabling confidence-inspiring proprioception and secure footplants on tricky terrain, and firm-but-adequate cushioning on hard-surface trails.

The upper and sole combination locks each stride to the ground. 鈥淚t is such a lightweight shoe, with great traction and fit, that moving your feet over terrain is easier than in a more bulky, highly-cushioned shoe,鈥� said Lousiville, Colorado-based tester Terri Kazanjian.

This was our go-to shoe for any fast-effort trail runs, or days we craved a highly nimble shoe that felt like an extension of our body. Kanzanjian summed up: 鈥淭his shoe makes you feel nimble and peppy on technical terrain, like you can run up those hills and bomb those descents faster than normal.鈥�

Best for Soft Terrain

Scarpa Spin ST

听

Weight: 9.5 oz (men鈥檚), 7.9 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 22鈥�18 mm
Drop: 4 mm
Sizing: European sizing 40-48 (men鈥檚), 36-43 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Effective, toothy grip on soft surfaces
鈯� Low gaiter-link heel collar helps keep out debris
鈯� Harsh ride on hard-packed trails

The 鈥淪T鈥� in the name stands for 鈥淪oft Terrain,鈥� which is what this shoe is best suited for. Here鈥檚 the main reason why: 7 mm(!) lugs made out of Vibram Mega Grip rubber take hold in soft dirt, mud, and snow, offering secure footing on even the sloppiest surfaces. Complementing the toothiness is an impressively secure foothold from PU overlays that encase a stretchy mesh-paneled upper and pull securely around the foot when the laces are tightened. A tester with a bunion on one foot noted the shoe鈥檚 narrow and unstretchy toe box caused some irritation but raved about the shoe鈥檚 ability to grab hold in soft dirt.

We reached for this shoe often on snowy terrain鈥攅ither on trails or when snow turned neighborhood roads into trails. The high heel collar made out of a neoprene-like stretch woven textile, which keeps trail debris out of the shoe in summer, also does a good job keeping kicked-up snow from infiltrating socks. The upper isn鈥檛 Gore-Tex, however, and doesn鈥檛 try to keep water out. Instead, moisture flows both in and out, and we appreciated the breathability on all-season runs where high effort caused hot feet, and for wet conditions when we wanted drainage. A plus: a lace-locking device and hidden lace pocket both eliminates unwanted loosening and snagging on low branches and roots.

With slight EVA cushioning in the midsole (22 mm under the heel and 18 mm under the forefoot), this isn鈥檛 a shoe you鈥檇 want to wear running hard-packed trails or road sections. But for the soft terrain it was intended for, the underfoot feel was just right, making the Scarpa Spin ST excel at tearing up the trail.

Best For Groomed Trails/Gravel

The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4

Weight: 10.1 oz (men鈥檚), 9 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack height: 32鈥�26 mm
Drop: 6 mm
Sizes: 7-13, 14 (men鈥檚); 5-11 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Great balance of stable and cushy
鈯� Propulsive feel
鈯� Can feel tippy on technical terrain

The North Face Enduris 4 is a downright comfortable shoe with a performance ride. Upon step -in, our feet felt cradled, secure, and ready for anything. The shoe excelled on routes like the 5.25-mile dirt-road loop around the Boulder Reservoir that is mostly loose gravel with occasional rocks and ruts. On smoother terrain like that, the super-trainer combination of lively cushioning sandwiched around a full-length TPU plate with rockered geometry made us feel smooth and energetic. The shoe can also handle technical terrain, but the plate makes it feel a tad tippy.

The swallow-tail design鈥攖he sole flares out behind the heel with a notch in the middle鈥攕eemed to aid a heel-striking gait, cushioning landings and helping to roll feet forward rather than torquing them inward. Traction comes from four-millimeter multidirectional lugs which worked well on a variety of surfaces and didn鈥檛 feel too clunky on smooth terrain, although one tester noted, 鈥淢ud seemed to stick to the outsole and stay there.鈥� All testers found the seamless engineered mesh upper breathed great and kept feet in place.

Overall, we鈥檙e big fans of the updated Enduris 4 with more cush. 鈥淭he shoe actually felt lighter than expected and easy to run in for both road-to-trail routes and straight trail running,鈥� said one tester.

Best Road-To-Trail

Nike Pegasus Trail 5

Weight: 10.6 oz (men鈥檚), 8.6 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 37鈥�27.5 mm
Drop: 9.5 mm
Sizes: 6-15 (men鈥檚) 5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Transitions well from asphalt to dirt
鈯� Secure fit for off-road confidence
鈯� Good-looking enough for casual wear
鈯� Not as cushioned as some other road-to-trail shoes

The Nike Pegasus Trail 5 is for runners who value a shoe that can take them from home to the trail and back, running smoothly on pavement while offering traction and foothold on even the most technical off-road terrain. What puts this shoe above other road-to-trail options is its superior performance on uneven, rooty, and rocky terrain. Flywire technology (super-strong, thin, and lightweight thread) in the upper kept our feet from sloshing around inside the shoe and helped us maintain quick, secure foot plants. 鈥淚 felt confident in both the traction and how my feet remained in control on a burly trail with lots of rocks and ups and downs,鈥� said a Boulder, Colorado, tester.

The cushioning is updated in this version to Nike鈥檚 smoothly responsive ReactX foam, with a stack soft and thick enough to soften pavement impact, especially under the forefoot. The shoe runs smoothly on roads with its flexible forefoot and 3.5 mm lugs that are hardly noticeable. But when you reach dirt those lugs kick into action and deliver solid traction.

Tightly woven mesh around the toe box adds durability, while strategically placed holes around the midfoot allow breathability. The addition of a looped cord at the heel makes this shoe easy to pull on鈥攁 simple feature we appreciated every time we used it.

This shoe also looks fashionable enough to crossover to casual wear, adding to its versatility. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a great shoe for travel that might include hiking, running, walking, and general adventuring,鈥� said our lead tester, who put it through its paces in Colorado and Costa Rica.

Best Max Cushioned

Brooks Caldera 8

Weight: 10.6 oz (men鈥檚), 9.3 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack height: 38.5鈥�32.5 mm
Drop: 6 mm
Sizes: men鈥檚: 7-14, 15 (men鈥檚); 5-11, 12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Comfort on long and short runs
鈯� Wide, stable base
鈯� Protective upper
鈯� Minimal ground feel

We鈥檝e long loved the high-cush, wide-silhouette Caldera for its ability to let us just zone out on a run. It鈥檚 a forgiving shoe, like a truck with really good shocks that allows you to mindlessly roll over rocks and roots. The Caldera 8 is a good companion for anything from short after-work trail jaunts to ultra-distance epics.

The midsole cushioning鈥擝rooks鈥� nitrogen-infused, EVA-based DNA Loft 3鈥攊s ample, while still lightweight. The Caldera 8 can feel like a lot underfoot, especially for lighter-weight runners, but testers said it successfully softened the ground impact of every step without wallowing in cush. Despite the massive stack height, flex grooves on the outsole help enable a smooth flowing stride. Aiding the Caldera鈥檚 forgiving nature is its wide silhouette that keeps it from being tippy, a large surface area for secure ground contact, and solid traction.

This year鈥檚 model features higher raised sidewalls to provide extra stability, and a smooth upper intended to evade snags from branches, both of which seem to work in our testing.

Best Natural Ride

Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4

Weight: 10.4 oz (men鈥檚), 8.2 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack height: 35鈥�30 mm
Drop: 5 mm
Sizes: 7-13, 14, 15 (men鈥檚); 6.5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Instantly comfortable on a variety of feet
鈯� Highly cushioned while still allowing ground feel
鈯� Doesn鈥檛 grab loose dirt well

The Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4 fits like a classic Topo shoe鈥攁 secure heel hold gives way to a wide toe box allowing the foot to splay out naturally. Even narrow-footed testers noted the secure and comfortable hold of this shoe, and enjoyed the feeling of support under the arch, which seems to further promote a relaxed forefoot.

The Topo Ultraventure 4 has a relatively high stack height and an ample amount of lively cushioning, which testers particularly noticed and appreciated under the ball of the foot. But unlike its high-cush contemporaries, the slightly firm, responsive, flexible midsole allows great feel for the ground. We enjoyed the surefooted feeling of being connected to the trails instead of floating on top of them.

The upper鈥攁 recycled mesh with a polyurethane wrap around the front of the shoe for protection from toe stubs鈥攊s slightly stretchy and conforms around the foot. 鈥淭his felt like a slipper with traction,鈥� said one tester.

Underfoot, wide, flat, 3.5-millimeter-deep lugs made of Vibram rubber stuck to steep rock slabs on dry trail runs in Boulder, Colorado, and ran smoothly on packed dirt. We craved a little more toothiness on loose trails, but appreciated the versatility and overall natural feel of this shoe. 鈥淭he Ultraventure 4 felt better the longer I went and more tired I got, encouraging and supporting a soft midfoot landing and gentle roll that ate up the miles,鈥� said one tester.

Best For Beginner Trail Runners

New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro v9

Weight: 10.3 oz (men), 8.3 oz (women)
Stack Height: 42鈥�38 mm
Drop: 4 mm
Sizing: 7-13, 14, 15, 16, 17 (men鈥檚); 5-11, 12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Both well-cushioned and stable
鈯� Aggressive traction
鈯� Large lugs can feel rough on hard pack

If you鈥檙e just getting into trail running, you need a shoe that provides stability, grip, and comfort鈥攊n essence, one that makes you more confident on the trail. Testers all agreed the New Balance Hierro v9 fit that bill better than any other shoe we tested. In this version, New Balance used two layers of their EVA-based Fresh Foam X in the midsole鈥攁 softer layer closer to the foot for cushioned comfort sits on top of a firmer layer that enhances stability. One tester noted this midsole combo 鈥渁bsorbs shock well and returns energy efficiently.鈥� She also praised the shoe鈥檚 forefoot rocker profile, which 鈥渕akes for a smooth push-off and helps with your forward motion and efficiency.鈥�

Despite having four millimeters more cushioning under the heel (and eight more under the forefoot) than version 8, bringing the total stack to a whopping 42鈥�38 millimeters, we found the Hierro v9 shockingly stable as long as we steered clear of technical terrain鈥攚hich most beginners tend to do anyway. Grippy 4.5-millimeter lugs鈥攚hich one tester described as 鈥渧ery aggressive鈥濃�攊nstill confidence, particularly on loose dirt and gravelly trails. The downside is that those long lugs contributed to a rough ride on hard-packed dirt or road.

A tough-skinned mesh upper with a gusseted tongue felt supportive, yet provided enough comfort for all-day use. All in all, the combination of a thick stack of soft cushioning, grippy outsole, and comfortable and secure upper make this a standout choice for beginner trail runners eager to explore.

How to Choose a Trail Running Shoe

If you鈥檙e in the market for a trail running shoe, first consider the type of trails you run on regularly: do you tackle rugged, mountainous terrain, or stick to mellow dirt paths? Some trail shoes can handle both adequately, while others are specialized and excel in one or the other. Shoes with smaller lugs are generally better on smoother, firmer terrain, whereas shoes with deeper, more aggressive outsoles are optimized for steep, muddy, or rocky trails. If you like to feel the trail and dance around rocks and roots, you鈥檒l likely prefer a light, more minimal shoe, but if you鈥檇 rather let the shoe roll over trail variations, cushioning and protecting while you zone out, you should look for a shoe with a thicker midsole.

Once you鈥檝e narrowed the search to a certain type of trail shoe, you need to find a pair that complements your unique body and stride. Every runner鈥檚 body, gait, speed, experience, and ride preferences are different, so every runner will interact differently with each trail shoe. The shoe that your best friend or your sister-in-law loves may be uncomfortable for you and make running feel slow, sluggish, or even painful. Finding the perfect pair of trail running shoes is a seriously personal affair.

The process for choosing the best running shoes is a matter of finding the models that both fit your foot and also feel best when you鈥檙e running. To determine fit and feel, there鈥檚 no substitute for trying the shoes on and running in them.

Fit: Match Your Foot Shape

When assessing fit, first pay attention to length. You need room at the end of your toes as your feet lengthen during their dynamic movements on the run. A rule of thumb is to allow a thumb鈥檚 width between your longest toe and the end of the shoe. Runners often wear a running shoe a half or full size bigger than their street shoes.

Ensure that the shape of the sole and the upper matches your foot shape. The sole should be as wide or wider than your foot for the whole length, and match the curve of your arch comfortably. The shoe should hold your foot securely over the instep, while allowing the ball of the foot and the toes to splay and flex when you roll forward onto them. Your heel shouldn鈥檛 slip when you lift it, and the arch should be able to dome and lengthen naturally. Nothing should bind or rub as you roll through the stride.

Feel: Match Your Movement Path

If the shoe fits, it鈥檚 time to take them on a short run on a treadmill, around the store, or, ideally, down the block and back. Every running shoe has a unique ride created by the type and density of foam in the midsole and the geometry of that foam: its thickness, width, heel-to-toe drop, molded sidewalls or flares, and forefoot flexibility or rocker shape (plus, in an increasing number of models, the presence of and type of embedded plate). Each of these elements interact with each other and your stride to determine how the shoe reacts on landing, how much it cushions, how stably it supports, how smoothly it transitions from landing to toe off, and how quickly and powerfully it rebounds.

The best way to choose the shoes that complement your body and stride is to find the ones that feel right on the run. Benno Nigg, the world-leading biomechanics professor who , calls it the 鈥渃omfort filter,鈥� but makes clear it is far more than how plush the shoe feels when you step into it. What you want to assess is whether the shoe allows and supports the way your feet want to move, what Nigg calls your 鈥減referred movement path.鈥� In the right shoe, while running at your normal pace, you will touch down where you expect to land, roll smoothly and stably through the stride without noticing the shoe, feel both cushioned from and connected to the ground, and push off naturally, quickly, and powerfully. When this comes together you鈥檒l know that you鈥檝e found your pair.

It鈥檚 likely that several shoes will feel good on your feet. To find the most comfortable, it helps to compare them back to back, like an eye doctor will do with corrective lenses: flipping between 鈥淎鈥� or 鈥淏,鈥� 鈥�1鈥� or 鈥�2.鈥� You may also find that different shoes feel better at different paces or level of fatigue, and you may want more than one pair. In fact, research shows that wearing a variety of different shoes is one of the few to reduce injury risk as it appears to vary the stresses on your feet and joints.

What About Injury Prevention?

Running shoes have long been marketed and sold as prescriptive devices to help runners stay healthy, but there is correlating shoes, or any specific shoe properties鈥攍ike cushioning or pronation control鈥攚ith running injuries. Medical professionals say that it is highly difficult to determine whether a runner needs a certain type of shoe, and studies have shown that prescribing shoes using traditional methods like treadmill gait analyses or wet-foot arch height tests don鈥檛 consistently reduce injuries.

Don鈥檛 assume that you need more cushioning or more stability if you have sore joints, or if you鈥檙e a heavier runner, or if you鈥檙e a beginner鈥攅vidence doesn鈥檛 support many common beliefs. The best way prevent injury is find two or three different pairs that feel right on the run, ease into using them, and vary your shoes, your running surface and your pace regularly (plus avoid rapid increases in your training load and work on ).

How We Test

• Number of testers: 18
• Number of shoes tested: 84
• Number of miles: 22,000+ over a year
• Most Memorable Trail Run: Having a mild winter afternoon turn into a blizzard while three miles from home in the western Nebraska sandhills.

To test running shoes, we begin by researching every brand鈥檚 new offerings for the coming season. We wind up with dozens of samples of the models (84 throughout the year, 34 trail running shoes this season) that are most promising, and distribute them to 26 testers who range in age, ability, running form, geographical location, terrain, and preferred shoe types. We try to put each tester in shoes from within the same category (all rugged, backcountry trail shoes, or all road-to-trail crossovers) so everyone can test apples-to-apples.

After three to six months of running in each model on varied terrain and in all conditions, our crew members report back with their assessments of fit, comfort, traction, cushioning, flexibility, stiffness, pop, what type of running the model is best used for, how the shoe compares to other models, and more. We also run in every trail running shoe ourselves, and, combining all the tester feedback with years of personal experience, hone in on the best. We then weigh this season鈥檚 bests against the heroes from previous seasons that are still available and choose winners and honorable mentions for each category.

Meet Our Lead Testers

Lisa Jhung

Freelance journalist, editor, and author has researched, tested, and written about running shoes for the past decade and a half, much of that time for 国产吃瓜黑料. She coordinates a fleet of female shoe testers out of Boulder, Colorado, and says her home office is a perpetual obstacle course of cardboard boxes and piles of running shoes. Lisa鈥檚 written about gear of all kinds for numerous national magazines as both an editor and freelancer, including a stint as the shoes and gear blogger and trail running microsite editor for Runner鈥檚 World.

A high school jumper and occasional sprinter/hurdler, she started running鈥攔eally running鈥攁fter walking off the collegiate volleyball team, and moved on to road and trail races of any distance, triathlons, adventure races, and mountain running. She鈥檚 happiest testing rugged trail shoes on gnarly terrain, and also loves a good neighborhood jaunt鈥ut is almost always looking for ribbons of dirt. Lisa is the author of Running That Doesn鈥檛 Suck: How to Love Running (Even if You Think You Hate It) and Trailhead: The Dirt on All Things Trail Running.

Cory Smith

passion for running started over 30 years ago in high school when he became the number six ranked runner in the nation at 3000 meters his senior year. After high school, he competed at Villanova University, earning two NCAA Division I Championship showings. Today, he鈥檚 determined not to let age slow him down and competes on the national master鈥檚 circuit, running a 4:12 (4:30 mile pace)) 1500 meters and 9:04 (4:52 mile pace) 3000 meters in 2021 at age 43. He prefers a hard track workout or tempo run over an easy long run any day but also appreciates a challenging trail or mountain run.

His obsession with running shoes started in 2014 when he wrote his first shoe review for Gear Institute. Since then, he鈥檚 tested and reviewed hundreds of running shoes, clothing, and gear for 国产吃瓜黑料, Runner鈥檚 World, Footwear News, and other outlets. He has a soft spot for speedy shoes over heavy trainers but loves dissecting all shoes equally and thinking like a product engineer to explain the why behind every design detail. Cory is the Founder of , an online running coaching business, and since its inception in 2014, has coached runners鈥� to over 100 Boston Marathon Qualifying times.

One of Cory Smith鈥檚 go-to routes for testing trail running shoes:

Jonathan Beverly

Jonathan fell in love with running his freshman year of high school and quickly became fascinated with finding the perfect pair of running shoes. That quest got a boost when he became editor of Running Times in 2000 and started receiving every new model as they were released. The parade of shoes continued while he served as shoe editor for Runner鈥檚 World, then editor of PodiumRunner, and currently fitness gear editor at 国产吃瓜黑料. Having now worn nearly every running shoe created in this century鈥攁nd a fair amount of those dating back to the early models of the 鈥�70s鈥攈e鈥檚 given up on finding the one best and now relishes the wide variety of excellent options.

Once a 2:46 marathoner regularly doing 50+ mile weeks, recent injuries and his age have reduced his volume and slowed his pace鈥攂ut he still enjoys an uptempo workout or two each week. Beverly is the author of the book which explores how each individual鈥檚 gait鈥攁nd thus shoe preference鈥攊s unique. He enjoys getting scientists鈥� take on new shoe trends and trying to describe the nuances of each shoe鈥檚 ride.

One of Jonathan Beverly鈥檚 go-to routes for testing trail running shoes:

The post The Best Trail Running Shoes for Every Terrain appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.

Running shoe technology is constantly evolving to meet the needs of the wide range of people getting out, gaining fitness, and pushing their personal limits. Today, the range of styles available to runners is greater than ever before, with shoe developers constantly introducing new foams and novel shapes, stack heights ranging from close-to-the-ground minimal to impossibly high maximal, and a smorgasbord of unique rides to complement any stride and preference.

A multitude of choices, however, can sometimes lead to decision paralysis. To help you find the best running shoe for your specific needs, we鈥檝e tested more than 100 pairs of new and updated models with a diverse team of over 20 testers. Whether you鈥檙e seeking a speedy shoe to make you feel like you鈥檙e flying (and help you PR), or a daily workhorse that you look forward to lacing up, our guide is here to help.

Update March 2025: We鈥檝e tested and selected new models in 11 categories, including a new best all-around pick of the Asics Novablast 5.

At a Glance

Training Shoes

• Best All-Around: Asics Novablast 5 ($140)
• Best Cushioned Trainer: Nike Vomero 18 ($150)
• Best Distance Trainer: Brooks Glycerin Max ($165)
• Best Value: Brooks Launch 11 ($120)
• Best Lightweight Trainer: Mizuno Neo Zen ($150)
• Best Super Trainer: Nike Zoom Fly 6 ($170)
• Best for Recovery Runs: Diadora Nucleo 2 ($160)
• Best Natural Ride: Mount to Coast R1 ($160)

Stability Shoes

• Best All-Around: Asics GEL-Kayano 31 ($165)
• Best Plush Stability: Puma ForeverRun Nitro 2 ($150)
• Best Lightweight Stability: Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 ($140)

Racing Shoes

• Best Marathon Racer: Nike Alphafly 3 ($285)
• Runner-Up Marathon Racer: Saucony Endorphin Elite 2 ($275)
• Best For Shorter Road Races: Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 ($250)

Trail Running Shoes

Tips and How We Test

• How to Choose a Road Running Shoe
• How We Test
• Meet Our Lead Testers

Best Training Shoes

Best All-Around

Asics Novablast 5

Weight: 9 oz (men), 7.9 oz (women)
Stack Height: 41.5鈥�33.5 mm (men鈥檚); 40.5鈥�32.5 mm (women鈥檚)
Drop: 8 mm
Sizing: 6-13, 14, 15 (men鈥檚), 5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Great weight-to-cushioning ratio
鈯� Smooth ride
鈯� Poor outsole grip in slick conditions

Versatile, cushioned, and responsive, few shoes check as many boxes as the ASICS Novablast 5. Underfoot, ASICS upgraded the midsole to FF Blast Max, a polyolefin-based compound that鈥檚 a touch softer and bouncier than its predecessor. Testers praised it for its 鈥減lush experience鈥� and 鈥渓ively and energetic feel underfoot.鈥� The shoe delivers a buttery smooth ride with a noticeable poppy feeling most everyday trainers lack. Despite the thick stack of foam underfoot, the Novablast 5 remains surprisingly nimble for an everyday trainer. While it鈥檚 not our first choice for dedicated speedwork, it handles uptempo efforts better than any other daily trainer we tested. The ride is also surprisingly stable thanks to the wide base and the responsiveness of the foam, which saves it from feeling squishy.

The fit, which is true to size, remains largely unchanged from the Novablast 4. Testers appreciated the new stitch-free engineered jacquard mesh upper, noting it felt a touch softer, improving overall comfort. Straight out of the box, the Novablast 5 felt run-ready with no break-in required.

One area that could be improved is the outsole. In an effort to keep the weight down, ASICS skimped on the rubber. This didn鈥檛 affect traction on dry surfaces, but one tester noted that he lacked confidence in the shoe during cold and wet runs. 鈥淚t鈥檚 not slick, but it doesn鈥檛 grip,鈥� he said.

We rarely suggest one shoe that would work for every runner, but the ASICS Novablast 5 is a standout that just about anyone would appreciate for almost any type of run.

Best Cushioned Trainer

Nike Vomero 18

Weight: 11.5 oz (men), 9.3 oz (women)
Stack Height: 46鈥�36 mm
Drop: 10 mm
Sizing: 6-13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 (men鈥檚), 5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Outstanding stability for such a tall shoe
鈯� Extremely comfortable
鈯� Heavy, slow

When it comes to adding volume to running shoe midsoles, more isn鈥檛 always better. Sometimes more is just more. That鈥檚 not the case with the Vomero 18. With an added six millimeters of foam underfoot, everything about this shoe exudes comfort. Holding the title as Nike鈥檚 most thickly cushioned running shoe to date, the Vomero 18 features a dual-density midsole that pairs a new version of Nike React X鈥攚hich Nike claims has 13 percent more energy return鈥攚ith ZoomX foam. React X, the firmer, more durable layer, delivers structure and support on the bottom, while the softer, more responsive ZoomX鈥攆eatured in Nike鈥檚 Alphafly and Vaporfly鈥攕its on top for a bouncier ride. The pairing delivered a smooth, cushioned ride that testers found both plush and surprisingly stable for such a high-stack shoe.

Nike didn鈥檛 just add more cushioning underfoot鈥攖he revamped engineered mesh upper also receives a healthy dose of padding for all-day comfort. The downside to all this plushness is that the Vomero 18 tipped the scales at 11.5 ounces for men and 9.2 ounces for women, making it the heaviest shoe we tested. While they are well balanced and don鈥檛 feel like weights on your feet, testers did note the shoe is best suited for everyday, easy, comfortable runs.

Best Distance Trainer

Brooks Glycerin Max

Weight: 10.5 oz (men), 9.5 oz (women)
Stack Height: 45鈥�39 mm
Drop: 6 mm
Sizing: 7-13, 14, 15 (men鈥檚), 5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Tuned midsole is both soft and responsive
鈯� Wide platform keeps tall midsole stable
鈯� Feels somewhat bulky

The Brooks Glycerin has long been Brooks鈥� premium highly cushioned everyday trainer. However, with stack heights increasing across the industry, its 38mm/28mm profile no longer stands out as a true max-cushioned option for long-distance running. Enter the Glycerin Max, which is Brooks鈥� highest-stacked shoe to date but manages to not feel overly tall.

Brooks鈥� new DNA Tuned midsole starts with its familiar nitrogen-infused EVA-based compound, but instead of being a consistent density throughout, the foam has different-sized cell structures in different locations, making it softer on the outside of the heel and firmer and more responsive on the inside of the heel and throughout the forefoot. 鈥淭he result is a high-cushion shoe that I found doesn鈥檛 wallow and allows the foot to engage as it rolls through the stride, making it a shoe that I, usually a max-shoe hater, wanted to wear more,鈥� noted one tester.

Raised sidewalls and a noticeably wide base aid in creating a stable stance for such a tall shoe. To enhance a smooth roll from an otherwise inflexible sole, a rockered forefoot encourages a natural forward transition, helping maintain momentum with each stride. A rather simple engineered mesh upper, consistent with other Brooks models, provides a true-to-size fit that complements the shoe鈥檚 plush underfoot feel. All in all, the Glycerin Max coddled our feet while rolling smoothly through the miles, making us want to keep going no matter how far from home we wandered.

Best Value

Brooks Launch 11

Weight: 7.7 oz (men), 7.1 oz (women)
Stack height: 35.5鈥�27.5 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Sizing: 7-15 (men鈥檚), 5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� A lot of bang for the buck
鈯� Foot-following fit and ride
鈯� Versatile
鈯� Narrow for some

It is not easy to find a good running shoe for less than 125 bucks these days, but the Brooks Launch 11 is an exception. The Launch 11 may not offer massive cushion or a carbon or nylon plate, but we kind of love that about it. Instead of the trampoline-like ride of so many other shoes on the market right now, the Launch 11 provides a classic, almost old-school vibe by allowing groundfeel while still offering a little bouncy rebound. Paired with an upper that conforms around and moves with your feet, plus looks great, we think this shoe gives a range of runners great bang for their buck.

With this update to the Launch, Brooks added 1.5 millimeters more lightweight, responsive cushioning (Brooks nitrogen-infused DNA Flash foam) under the heel and 2.5 millimeters more under the forefoot, with an insert of even lighter and springier DNA Flash 2. This gives the Launch 11 a higher stack height but a lower heel-toe offset (eight millimeters instead of 10) than the Launch 10. We found this update super comfortable and more than capable for everything from daily miles at a cruisy pace to shorter, faster efforts, and even allowed us to dance nimbly over tame trails. One tester noted that this shoe feels 鈥渓ight and springy and propels you forward,鈥� while another called it 鈥渄ownright snappy.鈥� Another tester gave the $120 Launch 11 a score of 10 out of 10, raving that it has 鈥渙ne of the best sneaker fits so far鈥� for her narrow foot, with 鈥渁ll the bells and whistles needed.鈥� Some other testers, however, found the fit too narrow.

Best Lightweight Trainer

Mizuno Neo Zen

Weight: 8.4 oz (men), 7.1 oz (women)
Stack Height: 39.5鈥�33.5 mm
Drop: 6 mm
Sizing: 7-13, 14 (men鈥檚), 6-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Energetic midsole
鈯� Smooth, accommodating ride
鈯� Upper bunches for those with narrow feet

As the market has gravitated toward softer shoes, Mizuno鈥攍ong known for its firm underfoot feel鈥攈as lagged behind. That is, until now. Testers were blown away by the comfort and smooth ride of the Mizuno Neo Zen. The standout feature? Its nitrogen-infused supercritical TPU midsole. 鈥淚t feels completely different than anything out there. It is very soft but feels responsive when you get moving in it,鈥� said one tester, while another added, 鈥淚t鈥檚 soft enough to soak up impact on easy runs but has a propulsive energy return that makes picking up the pace feel effortless.鈥� There鈥檚 no shortage of cushioning either with just under 40 millimeters of foam under the heel. Yet, despite all that foam, it remains impressively lightweight.

Ironically, given Mizuno鈥檚 history of using wave plates, the Neo Zen doesn鈥檛 have a plate embedded in its midsole like most super trainers. This contributes to the shoe having less of the trampoline-like bounce we鈥檇 like for race day, but it does offer an energetic feel for uptempo running and delivers a flexible, forgiving ride.

The upper features a stretchy, one-piece knit design that adapts to a variety of foot shapes and sizes. Often, a one-piece knit upper can be hit or miss, lacking the ability to wrap differently shaped feet securely. However, outside of some rippling across the forefoot when tied tight, testers were impressed by its sock-like fit and out-of-the-box comfort.

Best Super Trainer

Nike Zoom Fly 6

Weight: 9.3 oz (men), 7.7 oz (women)
Stack height: 40鈥�32 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Sizing: 6-15 (men鈥檚), 5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Works for a variety of runners
鈯� Performs at a variety of paces
鈯� Can feel funky when heel striking

By definition, supertrainers combine racing technology with more durable elements. The Zoom Fly 6 borrows ZoomX, Nike鈥檚 premium Pebax midsole foam, from the lauded Vaporfly super shoe racer. But while the Vaporfly 3 (and Alphafly 3) are solely built with ZoomX cushioning, the Zoom Fly 6 adds a bottom layer of more stable and durable EVA foam, making it a daily trainer built to last day in and day out. The Zoom Fly 6 also has a wider profile to feel less tippy than the raceday rockets, and a lower stack height which allows greater connection to the ground.

While the previous version of the Zoom Fly could feel thick and chunky on the foot, the 6 is lean and streamlined. We found it felt light and fast on tempo runs or when doing speedwork, and stable and comfortable on longer, slower runs, although the heel-toe transition is less smooth when heel striking at an easy pace.

The carbon plate sandwiched between the two layers of foam, which feels slightly less rigid and aggressively rockered than that in the Zoom Fly鈥檚 racing siblings, seemed to stabilize the ride and save energy. The texturized rubber outsole does a great job gripping dry or wet roads, and even feels capable on smooth dirt. The woven mesh upper is comfortable and breathable, and the partially gusseted tongue cradles the foot. The Zoom Fly 6 feels capable and fun for daily miles, but is no slouch as a race-day choice either.

Runners who don鈥檛 want to fork more than $250 for a race-only super shoe may just fall in love with the Zoom Fly 6, as many of our testers did.

Best For Recovery Runs

Diadora Nucleo 2

Weight: 9.7 oz (men), 7.4 oz (women)
Stack height: 35鈥�30 mm
Drop: 5 mm
Sizing: Men鈥檚 7-15; Women鈥檚 6-11.5

Pros and Cons
鈯� Good combo of cush and control
鈯� Comfortable upper
鈯� Tight across the toe box for wide feet

Yes, a shoe with a massive amount of soft cushioning can feel good underfoot for a cruisy run at an easy pace, but we think a comfy shoe with some stabilizing features works great for recovery. The Diadora Nucleo 2 is billed as a neutral trainer but has an updated heel counter that extends further towards the midfoot than the original Nucleo and provides some guidance to a tired stride. 鈥淭he stiff heel counter makes me feel protected and stable,鈥� said a tester. 鈥淚t made me feel capable for a longer run.鈥� We like how the cushioning from Diadora鈥檚 proprietary 鈥淎nima鈥� foam absorbs impact without feeling squishy for runs where we just wanted to zone out, and we appreciated the outsole鈥檚 ability to keep us sure footed.

We also enjoyed how the outsole of this road shoe allows for a little exploring. It鈥檚 made out of the brand鈥檚 anti-abrasive rubber, and even offered grip on slippery roads with alternating snowmelt and ice. 鈥淚 like that it has a little more traction than some shoes,鈥� said a tester. 鈥淚t can be used on road/packed trail, or road with imperfect conditions.鈥� And the soft-yet-secure mesh upper with a nicely padded tongue and heel collar feels like a comforting hug鈥攚hich is just what the doctor ordered after a day of hard training.

Read more about the Diadora Nucleo 2 in our stability shoe guide

Best Natural Ride

Mount to Coast R1

Weight: 8.5 oz (men), 7.5 oz (women)
Stack Height: 35鈥�27 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Sizing: 7-13, 14 (men鈥檚), 6.5-11 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Smooth ride,
鈯� Stable,
鈯� Adjustable lacing system
鈯� Not very cushioned

Hong Kong-based Mount to Coast may be new to the shoe scene, but it鈥檚 already making waves with its innovative approach to road running shoes. Marketed for ultra distance running, their debut shoe, the R1, is a medium stack height, everyday trainer with a suburb ground feel. One tester described the ride as 鈥渁lmost minimalist in allowing natural foot motion and sensitivity while dampening harsh landings.鈥� The magic lies in the combination of a proprietary nitrogen-infused supercritical PEBA-blend midsole with an embedded S-shaped PU-based insert that extends from the lateral midfoot to beneath the big toe. Testers reported that the firmer insert provided a slightly more stable platform during the transition from landing to toe-off without any hint of control.

What鈥檚 really unique is the dual lacing system that features a traditional shoelace over the midfoot and a separate, quick-pull tie for the forefoot. This design lets you customize tension independently, ensuring a tailored fit for both areas. We loved how it allowed for a roomy fit through the toes with a secure midfoot lockdown.

Although Mount to Coast markets these as an ultra-distance shoe, we’d confidently recommend them as a daily trainer for runners seeking a touch of cushioning while maintaining a natural feel.

Best Stability Shoes

Best All-Around

Asics GEL-Kayano 31

Weight: 10.7 oz (men鈥檚), 9.2 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 40鈥�30 mm (men鈥檚); 39鈥�29 mm (women鈥檚)
Drop: 10 mm
Sizing: Men鈥檚 6-16; Women鈥檚 5-13

Pros and Cons
鈯� Well-cushioned sole and upper
鈯� Smooth rolling ride
鈯� Stable without being firm or stiff
鈯� Somewhat heavy

Our testers were big fans of the Asics GEL-Kayano 30, which was a big departure from previous versions of the franchise shoe and a great example of how shoe companies have been rethinking traditional strategies to provide stability. The Kayano 31 built on the success of the 30, and we love it even more. 鈥淪ince the Kayano is a stability shoe,鈥� said a tester, 鈥淚 expected it to feel harder. But I was very pleasantly surprised at the high level of cushioning.鈥�

Like the 30, the 31 has a wide midsole and significant heel bevel, a flared sole under the forefoot, and soft, high-energy foam under the arch where we鈥檙e used to finding a firm medial post. Rather than attempting to block rotational movement, Asics says the bouncy insert, in combination with the shoes鈥� geometry, is designed to reduce the time at peak pronation and gently guide an over-rotating foot back into a more neutral position as it transitions from heel to toe-off.

The 31 boasts a new, engineered mesh upper that provides a great fit, regardless of foot shape. Testers loved how the upper 鈥渕orphs鈥� and 鈥渉ugs鈥� their feet, and raved about the plush comfort of the padded tongue and heel collar, as well as the cushioning underfoot. Also improved is the rubber outsole, which we found grippy on wet roads. This is a great update to an already reliable stability shoe that runs smoothly, responsively, and comfortably.

See our full round-up of stability shoes

Best Plush Stability

Puma ForeverRun Nitro 2

Weight: 10.4 oz (men), 8.1 oz (women)
Stack height: 38鈥�28 mm
Drop: 10 mm
Sizing: 7-13, 14 (men鈥檚), 6-11 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Soft and smooth
鈯� Stable without feeling controlling
鈯� Toe box uncomfortable for some

The Puma ForeverRun Nitro 2鈥檚 significant stack of nitrogen-infused TPE foam underfoot and a wide forefoot silhouette make this feel like a lot of shoe. This thing is plush. But for that much cush this shoe comes in at a reasonable weight and offers a forgiving, comfortable ride.

Testers found the foam鈥攁 combination of a softer core surrounded by a firmer perimeter 鈥攖o feel great underfoot, noting that the shoe ran 鈥渟mooth and easy.鈥� That鈥檚 not a description that comes easy for a stability shoe, and makes the ForeverRun Nitro 2 stand out. Complementing the underfoot cush is a premium engineered mesh upper that eliminates interior seams (aside from the partially gusseted tongue, which adds midfoot hold) to provide a welcoming step-in feel.听 The secure heel hold with a stabilizing external heel clip gives way to a narrow/secure-fitting midfoot, then splays out to a wide forefoot geometry that seems to add inherent stability throughout the gait cycle.

Despite the wide forefoot shape at the base, some testers craved more room on the interior, noting a feeling of crammed toes. But overall, the ForeverRun Nitro 2 is a great option for those seeking a combination of stability and cushioning in a good-looking shoe.

See our full round-up of stability shoes

Paid Advertisement by Backcountry.com

HOKA Clifton 9 Running Shoe

Need a light, plush shoe for your everyday miles? Meet the HOKA Clifton 9. HOKA added more foam underfoot yet somehow dropped ounces to give increased shock absorption at a lower weight, making the ride smoother and your stride freer. The strategically placed rubber zones ensure this pair holds strong against the rigors of a daily trainer, while the articulated heel collar keeps you locked in mile after mile.

Best Lightweight Stability

Brooks Hyperion GTS 2

Weight: 7.6 oz (men鈥檚), 6.9 oz (women鈥檚)
Stack Height: 31.5鈥�23.5 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Sizing: Men鈥檚 7鈥�15; Women鈥檚 5鈥�12

Pros and Cons
鈯� Lightweight
鈯� Low-profile, agile-feeling, and supportive ride
鈯� Highly breathable upper
鈯� Can feel too squishy in the heel for some

We loved the first-iteration Hyperion GTS for its lightweight comfort and springy, nitrogen-infused cushioning that one tester described as 鈥渇un and fast.鈥� The second version is updated with a new midsole compound鈥攏itrogen-infused DNA Flash v2鈥攚hich Brooks says is lighter weight and more responsive than its predecessor. We concur鈥攐ne tester described it as 鈥渟nappy,鈥� while another remarked on how it seems to push back while compressing and offers impressive rebound.

The GTS 2 still features stabilizing guide rails along the sides of the heel鈥攁 raised extension of the midsole foam on the outside, a firmer TPU piece on the inside鈥攖o help reduce heel shift and rotation for runners whose stride strays excessively inward or outward, especially towards the end of their run as a result of fatigue.

We appreciated the feeling of support while still being able to run smoothly and speedily when we wanted to up the effort. 鈥淚鈥檇 definitely speed train in these,鈥� said a tester. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e responsive, nimble, and light.鈥� These shoes are ideal for any runner looking for a daily trainer or racer that gives them a connected ground feel without being minimal. The cushioning is noticeable and lively, while the stability features are discreet. 鈥淚 found these easy to run in at any speed,鈥� said one. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e very responsive to whatever I feel like doing in them.鈥�

See our full round-up of stability shoes

Best Racing Shoes

Best Marathon Racer

Nike Alphafly 3

Weight: 7.8 oz (men), 6.2 oz (women)
Stack Height: 40鈥�32 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Sizing: 6-15 (men鈥檚), 5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Bouncy, trampoline-like ride
鈯� Works for a wide range of runners
鈯� Lighter weight than previous versions of the AlphaFly
鈯� Heel can feel unstable
鈯� Can be hard to find in specific sizes

We鈥檝e run in all three versions of the AlphaFly to date and think this third iteration is a great update. Subtle adjustments to the shoe鈥檚 geometry, including a wider footprint and carbon fiber plate, paired with repositioned Air Zoom units and strategically sculpted midsole, give the Alphafly 3 a distinctly different feel from its predecessor, which many found heavy and clunky compared to the original. This shoe again feels bouncy, fun, and fast.

Complementing the cush and rebound of ZoomX (Pebax) foam and Air Zoom units (pockets of compressed air and tensile threads) is a full-length carbon fiber plate that gives the shoe extra snap and adds a touch of appreciated stability that even the most efficient runners can benefit from when fatigued (marathon, anyone?). One of our more competitive testers praised the Alphafly 3 for its bouncy, energy-saving ride and says she鈥檒l wear no other shoe for races longer than 10 miles. Another speedy tester noted, 鈥淓ven running as fast as 5k pace, I found the Alphafly responded quickly, encouraging a fast turnover.鈥� Some slower runners noted, however, that landing on the Alphafly鈥檚 sculpted heel can create a feeling of instability until the plate is engaged at the midfoot roll.

The upper of the Alphafly 3 is a lightweight, super-breathable mesh with an integrated tongue and thin, notched laces that pull tight and stay tied. Our feet were comfortable and secure without any pressure points on top of the ready-to-fly platform. We love that this shoe got lighter than its previous versions, which adds to its race-readiness.

Read our full review of the Alphafly 3. .

Runner-Up Marathon Racer

Saucony Endorphin Elite 2

Weight: 7.0 oz (men)
Stack height: 39.5鈥�31.5 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Sizing: 3.5-14 (men鈥檚/unisex)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Fast and springy
鈯� Secure foothold
鈯� Slightly unstable

Talk about an overhaul. This second iteration of the Saucony Elite could not be more different than the first. The primary reason is the underfoot feel of Saucony鈥檚 new, proprietary midsole material made out of TPEE that they鈥檙e calling 鈥淚ncrediRUN鈥� foam. While the original Elite鈥檚 midsole felt until compressed powerfully, the Elite 2鈥檚 midsole feels wildly squishy and unstable when walking or slow jogging in the shoe. But, as one tester noted, 鈥淥nce I started to pick up the pace, the foam firmed up and became insanely responsive.鈥� With a stack height that falls just within legal limits for a marathon-racing shoe, that massive amount of rebounding foam鈥攃ombined with a carbon fiber plate that鈥檚 slotted in the forefoot for flexibility (the same plate as in the original Saucony Elite) and an aggressive toe spring鈥攎akes this shoe beg for speed.

The upper has also been drastically updated, and we dig it. A combination of knit and mesh plus an airy knit tongue makes the shoe highly breathable. Testers found the heel collar and areas underneath the TPU overlays a bit warmer, but loved the secure heel fit paired with a roomier toe box. This is a fast, fun, lively shoe for race day.

Fit notes: We found this shoe to run a bit short. Also, the heel collar comes up high enough that a longer-than-no-show sock is needed.

Best For Shorter Road Races

Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4

Weight: 7.1 oz (men), 6.1 oz (women)
Stack Height: 39鈥�33 mm
Drop: 6 mm
Sizing: 6-13.5, 14.5 (men鈥檚), 5-12 (women鈥檚)

Pros and Cons
鈯� Soft, bouncier midsole than previous versions
鈯� Great fitting, comfortable upper
鈯� Less stability and ground feel than previous versions

For short road races like the 5k and 10k you need a shoe that鈥檚 lively, explosive, and ready to roll. The new Adios Pro is all that. 鈥淯nlike the Pro 3, which felt more like a cruising shoe, the Pro 4 actively pushed you forward,鈥� one tester remarked, adding that 鈥渋t makes fast paces feel easier.鈥� To achieve this, Adidas overhauled the Adios Pro 4 from top to bottom. Previously recognized as one of the firmer and more stable super shoes, it now joins the ranks of softer, bouncier super racers built for maximum cushioning and energy return. The newly formulated midsole is noticeably softer and bouncier.

Adidas鈥� signature energy rods are still embedded in the midsole, adding a bit of rigidity to the squish and roll. The start of the rocker, however, has been shifted backward, from 70 to 60 percent of the distance from heel to toe. When building their ultralight, high-performing race model, the , Adidas鈥� designers learned that the longer rocker engages the foot earlier in the stride and benefits forefoot and midfoot runners, enabling a smoother transition from midfoot to toe-off. Testers noted the change, with one saying, 鈥淭his shoe allows you to push off of your toe a lot easier than other shoes, which gives that fast feel.鈥�

Substantial improvements were also made to the upper, which is now crafted of a one-way stretch-woven upper material that鈥檚 incredibly soft and form-fitting. Testers loved how it adapted to their foot鈥檚 shape, providing a secure, locked-in feel for total control. 鈥淭he upper disappears on my foot in the best way possible,鈥� remarked one.

鈥淭he Pro 4 is lighter, bouncier, and responsive than the Pro 3鈥攁 huge step up.鈥� Unfortunately, those who liked the firmer, more stable and grounded feel of the Pro 3 may feel differently.

How to Choose a Running Shoe

When choosing a road running shoe, the first step is to determine the type of running you鈥檒l primarily be doing in them. Do you need a speedy racer, a shoe that offers comfort during long, slow jogs, or a versatile trainer that can handle various distances and paces?

Next, consider your preference for the feel of the shoe鈥檚 cushioning: do you like a soft, forgiving ride, a more energetic, bouncy sensation underfoot, or a firmer platform that provides better ground feel? With advancements in foams and technologies, many shoes today offer cushioning without compromising responsiveness or stability. However, each shoe balances these characteristics differently, providing a spectrum of options to choose from. The key to finding the perfect running shoe is choosing the one you鈥檙e most comfortable with.

Once you鈥檝e narrowed the search to a certain type of road shoe, you need to find a pair that complements your unique body and stride. Every runner鈥檚 body, gait, speed, experience, and ride preferences are different, so every runner will interact differently with each running shoe. The shoe that your best friend or your sister-in-law loves may be uncomfortable for you and make running feel slow, sluggish, or even painful. Finding the perfect pair of road running shoes is a seriously personal affair.

The process for choosing the best running shoes is a matter of finding the models that both fit your foot and also feel best when you鈥檙e running. To determine fit and feel, there鈥檚 no substitute for trying the shoes on and running in them.

Fit: Match Your Foot Shape

When assessing fit, first pay attention to length. You need room at the end of your toes as your feet lengthen during their dynamic movements on the run. A rule of thumb is to allow a thumb鈥檚 width between your longest toe and the end of the shoe. Runners often wear a running shoe a half or full size bigger than their street shoes.

Ensure that the shape of the sole and the upper matches your foot shape. The sole should be as wide or wider than your foot for the whole length, and match the curve of your arch comfortably. The shoe should hold your foot securely over the instep, while allowing the ball of the foot and the toes to splay and flex when you roll forward onto them. Your heel shouldn鈥檛 slip when you lift it, and the arch should be able to dome and lengthen naturally. Nothing should bind or rub as you roll through the stride.

Feel: Match Your Movement Path

If the shoe fits, it鈥檚 time to take them on a short run on a treadmill, around the store, or, ideally, down the block and back. Every running shoe has a unique ride created by the type and density of foam in the midsole and the geometry of that foam: its thickness, width, heel-to-toe drop, molded sidewalls or flares, and forefoot flexibility or rocker shape (plus, in an increasing number of models, the presence of and type of embedded plate). Each of these elements interact with each other and your stride to determine how the shoe reacts on landing, how much it cushions, how stably it supports, how smoothly it transitions from landing to toe off, and how quickly and powerfully it rebounds.

The best way to choose the shoes that complement your body and stride is to find the ones that feel right on the run. Benno Nigg, the world-leading biomechanics professor who , calls it the 鈥渃omfort filter,鈥� but makes clear it is far more than how plush the shoe feels when you step into it. What you want to assess is whether the shoe allows and supports the way your feet want to move, what Nigg calls your 鈥減referred movement path.鈥� In the right shoe, while running at your normal pace, you will touch down where you expect to land, roll smoothly and stably through the stride without noticing the shoe, feel both cushioned from and connected to the ground, and push off naturally, quickly, and powerfully. When this comes together you鈥檒l know that you鈥檝e found your pair.

It鈥檚 likely that several shoes will feel good on your feet. To find the most comfortable, it helps to compare them back to back, like an eye doctor will do with corrective lenses: flipping between 鈥淎鈥� or 鈥淏,鈥� 鈥�1鈥� or 鈥�2.鈥� You may also find that different shoes feel better at different paces or level of fatigue, and you may want more than one pair. In fact, research shows that wearing a variety of different shoes is one of the few to reduce injury risk as it appears to vary the stresses on your feet and joints.

What About Injury Prevention?

Running shoes have long been marketed and sold as prescriptive devices to help runners stay healthy, but there is correlating shoes, or any specific shoe properties鈥攍ike cushioning or pronation control鈥攚ith running injuries. Medical professionals say that it is highly difficult to determine whether a runner needs a certain type of shoe, and studies have shown that prescribing shoes using traditional methods like treadmill gait analyses or wet-foot arch height tests don鈥檛 consistently reduce injuries.

Don鈥檛 assume that you need more cushioning or more stability if you have sore joints, or if you鈥檙e a heavier runner, or if you鈥檙e a beginner鈥攅vidence doesn鈥檛 support many common beliefs. The best way prevent injury is find two or three different pairs that feel right on the run, ease into using them, and vary your shoes, your running surface and your pace regularly (plus avoid rapid increases in your training load and work on ).

How We Test

• Number of testers: 27
• Number of shoes tested: 102
• Number of miles: 21,000+ over a year

To test running shoes, we begin by researching every brand鈥檚 upcoming offerings for the coming season. We wind up with dozens of samples of the models (40 road shoes this season, 102 over the year) that are most promising鈥攏ot just for us, but for 27 testers that range in age, ability, running form, geographical location, and preferred shoe types. We try to put each tester in models from within the same category (e.g., neutral, stability, carbon fiber, zero drop or uptempo) so everyone can compare apples-to-apples.

After three to six months of running in each model on paved roads, concrete multi-use paths, treadmills, sandy beach paths, dirt roads, and tracks at a variety of distances, paces, and weather conditions, our crew members report back with their assessments of fit, comfort, traction, cushioning, flexibility, stiffness, pop, what type of running the model is best used for, how the shoe compares to other models, and more. We also run in every shoe ourselves, and, combining all the tester feedback with years of personal experience, hone in on the best. This guide combines the best recent shoes with outstanding shoes still available from the past two test periods.

Meet Our Lead Testers

Lisa Jhung

Freelance journalist, editor, and author has researched, tested, and written about running shoes for the past decade and a half, much of that time for 国产吃瓜黑料 and 国产吃瓜黑料 Buyer鈥檚 Guides. She coordinates a fleet of female shoe testers out of Boulder, Colorado, and says her home office is a perpetual obstacle course of cardboard boxes and piles of running shoes. Lisa鈥檚 written about gear of all kinds for numerous national magazines as both an editor and freelancer, including a stint as the Shoes & Gear blogger and trail running microsite editor for Runner鈥檚 World.

A high school jumper and occasional sprinter/hurdler, she started running鈥攔eally running鈥攁fter walking off the collegiate volleyball team, and moved on to road and trail races of any distance, triathlons, adventure races, and mountain running. She鈥檚 happiest testing rugged trail shoes on gnarly terrain, and also loves a good neighborhood jaunt鈥ut is almost always looking for ribbons of dirt. Lisa is the author of Running That Doesn鈥檛 Suck: How to Love Running (Even If You Think You Hate It) and Trailhead: The Dirt on All Things Trail Running.

Cory Smith

passion for running started over 30 years ago in high school when he became the number six ranked runner in the nation at 3000 meters his senior year. After high school, he competed at Villanova University, earning two NCAA Division I Championship showings. Today, he鈥檚 determined not to let age slow him down and competes on the national master鈥檚 circuit, running a 4:12 (4:30 mile pace)) 1500 meters and 9:04 (4:52 mile pace) 3000 meters in 2021 at age 43. He prefers a hard track workout or tempo run over an easy long run any day but also appreciates a challenging trail or mountain run.

His obsession with running shoes started in 2014 when he wrote his first shoe review for Gear Institute. Since then, he鈥檚 tested and reviewed hundreds of running shoes, clothing, and gear for 国产吃瓜黑料, Runner鈥檚 World, Footwear News, and other outlets. He has a soft spot for speedy shoes over heavy trainers but loves dissecting all shoes equally and thinking like a product engineer to explain the why behind every design detail. Cory is the Founder of , an online running coaching business, and since its inception in 2014, has coached runners鈥� to over 100 Boston Marathon Qualifying times.

Here鈥檚 one of 颁辞谤测鈥檚 shoe-testing routes on MapMyRun:

Jonathan Beverly

Jonathan fell in love with running his freshman year of high school and quickly became fascinated with finding the perfect pair of running shoes. That quest got a boost when he became editor of Running Times in 2000 and started receiving every new model as they were released. The parade of shoes continued while he served as shoe editor for Runner鈥檚 World, then editor of PodiumRunner, and currently fitness gear editor at 国产吃瓜黑料. Having now worn nearly every running shoe created in this century鈥攁nd a fair amount of those dating back to the early models of the 鈥�70s鈥攈e鈥檚 given up on finding the one best and now relishes the wide variety of excellent options.

Once a 2:46 marathoner regularly doing 50+ mile weeks, recent injuries and his age have reduced his volume by about half and slowed his easy training pace to around nine-minute miles鈥攂ut he says he still enjoys an uptempo workout or two each week. Beverly is the author of the book which explores how each individual鈥檚 gait鈥攁nd thus shoe preference鈥攊s unique. He enjoys getting scientists鈥� take on new shoe trends and trying to describe the nuances of each shoe鈥檚 ride.

The post The Best Running Shoes for Training and Racing appeared first on 国产吃瓜黑料 Online.